By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Nintendo Wii U supports 1080p, CPU and GPU confirmed - UPDATE: Spec sheet! 1.5 GB RAM, 3 core PowerPC CPU etc. Thread now includes FREE Icelandic lessons!

it's clear that WiiU is more powerful than 360, and it's normal, 360 stands up really, really good for a 6 year old console

Trine 2 and Pikmin 3 look amazing

the thing now is that Sony/Microsoft have to make beast consoles to repeat what happened with Wii and 3rd parties

WiiU is going to sell anyway, Mario and his games are way too popular now, if GTA V and CoD could just be shared with Us : P



don't mind my username, that was more than 10 years ago, I'm a different person now, amazing how people change ^_^

Around the Network
dark_gh0st_b0y said:
it's clear that WiiU is more powerful than 360, and it's normal, 360 stands up really, really good for a 6 year old console

Trine 2 and Pikmin 3 look amazing

the thing now is that Sony/Microsoft have to make beast consoles to repeat what happened with Wii and 3rd parties

WiiU is going to sell anyway, Mario and his games are way too popular now, if GTA V and CoD could just be shared with Us : P


Actually, I remember Sony announcing some time ago that their console "won't" be that much more powerful than Nintendo's. I do believe they learned their lesson about relying on nothing but specs.



fillet said:
NintendoPie said:
pezus said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
Reads "CPU and GPU confirmed"

Then reads "The CPU is an IBM Power-based multi-core processor. The GPU is an AMD Radeon-based High Definition GPU"

Fuck you!

Hey, don't kill the messenger!

It's almost confirmed that it is indeed more powerful than PS3/360. Even the launch games and 3rd party ports look better than the PS3/360 games.

LOL! You seriously think that, Pezus? They showed almost nothing...


If it's based in 7xxx series ATI cards, which means this gen's cards. It's almost certain to be more powerful than the PS3 and Xbox 360. Even the mainstream 7xxx cards piss all over an nVidia 7800GT which is tech inside PS3 (although gimped further in PS3) and about SIX GENERATIONS AHEAD

Geforce 7xxx

Geforce 8xxx

Gefore 1xx (debatable if genuine generation as tech was a frankenstein of 8 series technology)

Geforce 2xx

Geforce 4xx

Geforce 5xx

Geforce 6xx = AMD or ATI 7xxx series.

 

Six generations.

 

Almost impossible to be slower than PS3 or 360. GPU makes up the majority of how good a game looks CPU doesn't count for much where we are these days.

uh, no man, it's rumored to be r7xx, which is radeon 4xxx series.... yes, it still pisses all over the GPUs in 360 or PS3 even if that's the rumor, but it's not a 7xxx series.



en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenon_(processor)

PowerPC but PPE's based on the Cell, Sony was "sloppy" with their terms, IBM took advantage.



pezus said:
lilbroex said:
dark_gh0st_b0y said:
it's clear that WiiU is more powerful than 360, and it's normal, 360 stands up really, really good for a 6 year old console

Trine 2 and Pikmin 3 look amazing

the thing now is that Sony/Microsoft have to make beast consoles to repeat what happened with Wii and 3rd parties

WiiU is going to sell anyway, Mario and his games are way too popular now, if GTA V and CoD could just be shared with Us : P


Actually, I remember Sony announcing some time ago that their console "won't" be that much more powerful than Nintendo's. I do believe they learned their lesson about relying on nothing but specs.

It will be easier for them this time to have high specs and keep the price down. No expensive blu-ray drive. 

Plus, they are releasing at least a year after Nintendo's console. I expect a significant jump.


Then you are expecting Sony to have a told a lie about thier on own intentions. They are not aiming for a powerhouse any more from all that I have a gathered.


It would be wise as well looking at the state of not only the PS3, but also Vita.

Millenium said:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenon_(processor)

PowerPC but PPE's based on the Cell, Sony was "sloppy" with their terms, IBM took advantage.

So it is a power5 with some of the cells PPE's added to it. Interesting.



Around the Network

Specs are good but nothing amazing.



pezus said:
lilbroex said:
pezus said:
lilbroex said:
dark_gh0st_b0y said:
it's clear that WiiU is more powerful than 360, and it's normal, 360 stands up really, really good for a 6 year old console

Trine 2 and Pikmin 3 look amazing

the thing now is that Sony/Microsoft have to make beast consoles to repeat what happened with Wii and 3rd parties

WiiU is going to sell anyway, Mario and his games are way too popular now, if GTA V and CoD could just be shared with Us : P


Actually, I remember Sony announcing some time ago that their console "won't" be that much more powerful than Nintendo's. I do believe they learned their lesson about relying on nothing but specs.

It will be easier for them this time to have high specs and keep the price down. No expensive blu-ray drive. 

Plus, they are releasing at least a year after Nintendo's console. I expect a significant jump.


Then you are expecting Sony to have a told a lie about thier on own intentions. They are not aiming for a powerhouse any more from all that I have a gathered.


It would be wise as well looking at the state of not only the PS3, but also Vita.

Who said that by the way? Sony should definitely go for power, because it doesn't matter what Sony would do, it would just be a Nintendo ripoff.


The PS3 was the first console from Sony that wasn't the weakest. The PS3 was an oddball move for Sony. I doubt that will conintue that route seeing as it cost them so much already.

I will have to find the reports but it was from Sony itself.

http://www.businessinsider.com/2009/1/rumor-sony-ps4-plans-leaked-and-it-targets-casual-gamers-sne

This is the best I coud locate about it, but it seems that it will pretty much be an enhanced PS3 specwise.

 

The statement in quesiton

"The PS4 will also continue to utilize the existing CELL architecture, rather than launch something brand new. Bravo, says me, because forcing developers to effectively pick up and move from their established country to Timbuktu every half a decade is a surefire way to cripple launch cycles and leave "un-anointed" third-party developers out in the cold. What’s more, a twice-powerful PS3 would almost certainly offer enough "oomph" to keep the plaudits coming from the hardcore faithful, while allowing Sony to more vigorously reach out to the Nintendo "casual" market with a steady stream of cheap-to-develop titles.


So no, the PS4 will not have a 6 core processor with twice as much ram as the dude was trying to insist earlier.





fillet said:
NintendoPie said:
pezus said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
Reads "CPU and GPU confirmed"

Then reads "The CPU is an IBM Power-based multi-core processor. The GPU is an AMD Radeon-based High Definition GPU"

Fuck you!

Hey, don't kill the messenger!

It's almost confirmed that it is indeed more powerful than PS3/360. Even the launch games and 3rd party ports look better than the PS3/360 games.

LOL! You seriously think that, Pezus? They showed almost nothing...


If it's based in 7xxx series ATI cards, which means this gen's cards. It's almost certain to be more powerful than the PS3 and Xbox 360. Even the mainstream 7xxx cards piss all over an nVidia 7800GT which is tech inside PS3 (although gimped further in PS3) and about SIX GENERATIONS AHEAD

Geforce 7xxx

Geforce 8xxx

Gefore 1xx (debatable if genuine generation as tech was a frankenstein of 8 series technology)

Geforce 2xx

Geforce 4xx

Geforce 5xx

Geforce 6xx = AMD or ATI 7xxx series.

 

Six generations.

 

Almost impossible to be slower than PS3 or 360. GPU makes up the majority of how good a game looks CPU doesn't count for much where we are these days.

It says it's based on AMD R7xx not the 7000 series. R7xx gpu's are AMD 4000 series.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radeon_R700




starcraft: "I and every PS3 fanboy alive are waiting for Versus more than FFXIII.
Me since the games were revealed, the fanboys since E3."

Skeeuk: "playstation 3 is the ultimate in gaming acceleration"

lilbroex said:


The PS3 was the first console from Sony that wasn't the weakest. The PS3 was an oddball move for Sony. I doubt that will conintue that route seeing as it cost them so much already.

I will have to find the reports but it was from Sony itself.

http://www.businessinsider.com/2009/1/rumor-sony-ps4-plans-leaked-and-it-targets-casual-gamers-sne

This is the best I coud locate about it, but it seems that it will pretty much be an enhanced PS3 specwise.

 

The statement in quesiton

"The PS4 will also continue to utilize the existing CELL architecture, rather than launch something brand new. Bravo, says me, because forcing developers to effectively pick up and move from their established country to Timbuktu every half a decade is a surefire way to cripple launch cycles and leave "un-anointed" third-party developers out in the cold. What’s more, a twice-powerful PS3 would almost certainly offer enough "oomph" to keep the plaudits coming from the hardcore faithful, while allowing Sony to more vigorously reach out to the Nintendo "casual" market with a steady stream of cheap-to-develop titles.


So no, the PS4 will not have a 6 core processor with twice as much ram as the dude was trying to insist earlier.



That statement is very old and seemingly very out dated. As all rumours point to ditching the CELL architecture, not to mention that the CELL was basically abandoned at the end of 2009. 

Having said that though, you are right. Sony would be crazy to try and go for the most powerful console again. Reasonable is the way to go. 



Turkish says and I'm allowed to quote that: Uncharted 3 and God Of War 3 look better than Unreal Engine 4 games will or the tech demo does. Also the Naughty Dog PS3 ENGINE PLAYS better than the UE4 ENGINE.

smbu2000 said:
fillet said:
NintendoPie said:
pezus said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
Reads "CPU and GPU confirmed"

Then reads "The CPU is an IBM Power-based multi-core processor. The GPU is an AMD Radeon-based High Definition GPU"

Fuck you!

Hey, don't kill the messenger!

It's almost confirmed that it is indeed more powerful than PS3/360. Even the launch games and 3rd party ports look better than the PS3/360 games.

LOL! You seriously think that, Pezus? They showed almost nothing...


If it's based in 7xxx series ATI cards, which means this gen's cards. It's almost certain to be more powerful than the PS3 and Xbox 360. Even the mainstream 7xxx cards piss all over an nVidia 7800GT which is tech inside PS3 (although gimped further in PS3) and about SIX GENERATIONS AHEAD

Geforce 7xxx

Geforce 8xxx

Gefore 1xx (debatable if genuine generation as tech was a frankenstein of 8 series technology)

Geforce 2xx

Geforce 4xx

Geforce 5xx

Geforce 6xx = AMD or ATI 7xxx series.

 

Six generations.

 

Almost impossible to be slower than PS3 or 360. GPU makes up the majority of how good a game looks CPU doesn't count for much where we are these days.

It says it's based on AMD R7xx not the 7000 series. R7xx gpu's are AMD 4000 series.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radeon_R700

So that mean that its likely still a smaller version of the 4950 like what was said in the early days after last years e3. They also said it had an independent tessellator then, so I am inclined to believe its true.