morenoingrato said:
I am unnamed.
Prof has to be named, why else would he question a 4th human character?
|
Put it this way:
You are unnamed or you are lying.
You jumped to the conlcusion that all humans must be unnamed.
If prof is telling the truth, then his role PM has him as a named human. Looking at the wiki there are 4 named humans, so he assumes the other human claims are also named characters. This says nothing of anyone's alignment really, just the type of character each person should have.
You claim a 5th human, and prof thinks being last you are most likely to be lying. If you had denied it and said you were one of the four, he may have moved on to one of the others, but then you say you are unnamed. You jump to the conclusion that he must be scum because he is not claiming to be like what you are claiming. You also don't consider that maybe other humans are named.
Now that every other human claim says they have a name, what say you?