So when I lie it's good ::shrug:: so be it

Glad you got Baal posting again, though. I'm not believing his "mistake" about the vigilante role, given he put a non-compulsive two-shot vig in his own game. The fear feels forced as well.

1) You do not get to be all arrogant like you were day one last game and then play the pity card here.

2) You've used a vig in your own game, thus you already know how the role generally operates. Nobody would instinctively jump to the conclusion of a compulsive vig.

3) Nobody else is a vig, or Spurge would be dead.(certainly true now that everyone else has posted) This does not confirm him of being a vig though. Even a second kill at night won't confirm him completely as town given prof's belief that an SK shouldn't be forced to kill every night; however, prof also preaches balances so he'd have a counter if that were the case.(Spurge would scan guilty or we'd have a town bulletproof for example)

You talk about fear of recklessness after Spurge said "Well I just don't want to make a mistake like last game and do anything beyond stupid again." meaning if he's telling the truth he's going to be very cautious.

Lastly, it's very telling when you point out that scum would be afraid of it and then insist on your honesty.

Yes, because lying albeit generally wrong and frowned upon when exposed, is a necessity to survive sometimes.

You're taking my advice, and you're surviving. I'm not going to crucify you for something I encouraged.

Oh believe that which you must, my whole analysis was done on the thought process he needed to target every night.  I know perfectly well how a vigilante operates, and as was stated, had one in my own game.  But the plain and simple truth is that I have not written a single thing from this game down, and it has led to faulty conclusions on my behalf.

I'm not saying my bullshit conclusions shouldn't be looked at, because what I posted is what I posted, and that cannot be changed.  I'm just telling you now, there is a reason why the conclusions are full of shit.

Also, he didn't say he was going to be very cautious.  He said he wasn't going to do anything beyond stupid.  A very cautious vigilante would just not kill anybody throughout the entire game, and therefore not make any mistakes with their kills.  To target those who are legitimate concerns towards the town, however, would not be beyond stupid even if they wind up as town power roles (I'm not saying it would be a good thing for him to wind up killing a town power role, I'm saying risks need to be taken as a vigilante, and I wouldn't consider his decision beyond stupid if his target was legitimately scummy).

Also, I never insisted on my honesty.  I repeated what you mentioned, and said whether or not scum would be more inclined to have that feeling about a vigilante, the plain and simple truth is that I too have that feeling.  More or less, I am telling you I don't care whether the feeling I have is scummy, but it is how I feel.  I'm just having a hard time grasping how this is insisting honesty, when it is doing nothing of the sort.

Finally, I know you dislike the way I play day 1 in this game, but I have given my reasoning for this on multiple occasions, and there is no way in hell it doesn't make at least a little sense to you why I think in that way.

Still don't believe you would jump to the conclusion that he HAD to kill, regardless of time restraints or lack of notes.

Bolded is insisting on your honesty.

I dislike how most play day one. Even those that are active content wise are generally too cautious about lynching for my tastes. I can deal with that. It was the arrogant tone and putting everyone down for actually trying to play Mafia that bothered me. People are going to make mistakes/be wrong with so little to go on, but that's the game. Now you're all "woe is me. I made a mistake, but don't be cruel to me okay"

I'd be okay with your lynch as well today, but I do think my case on Wonk is stronger and there's already support there to help keep it from being derailed.
Vote: Wonktonodi

Do we have anything on Wonk other than the fact of the 3rd investigative role claim?

1. So should I not use the example of what just happend to help explain since the example is now there. If you are trying to go back to my point with MDJ yesterday. When you ask why MDJ I gave you reasons why you should vote him that were current that you are trying to twist into a contradiction.

2. That is also a good reason to not want the cop to be lurking.

3. In this game with such short days and low participation the cop is probably more important than players reads on people. We as a town are doing terrible and so many have said so little it's hard to get readds.

4. I voted for MDJ yesterday, I am not one to really try and tell the Vig what to do although at this point I'm thinking he should shoot you.

5. 2 of the last 3 games I have been MVP so I should be a target to scum as it is :P. Not only that though, as you pointed out I would have been the best choice for the cop to investigate last night so they could have taken out someone who would be cleared. If instead they were trying for the cop if the cop wre to have done his job and cleared me, then the cop would likely get the docs protection and I would likely get the night kill. Or there was also the possibibilty people would get all meta and thinking the role shouldn't be in the game and lynch me. Glad you had a laugh though :)

6. If you are cop and so sure I am scum that you didn't bother to investigate and just plan on letting me die. Good job boss you'll have killed your deputy.

Why me though?  but I really don't mind you voting for me and your read is completely off. LOLOLOL . That's all.

Anyway, Linkz my logic is a failure? I think I really hit the spot. If he is in the state of urgency if he is really a town that is, why he is not pushing for a lynch or making a move on whoever he thinks is/are the mafia? He even pointed out how important to lynch someone. Quite frankly He is acting the way he is acting when he was a mafia. He is making himself look like a townie, I mean too much. He is scared that any post he makes will make him look like a scum. BTW  Linkz why are you so protective of Radish?? I really don't like you or other person answering for him. I also don't like you pointing out that he made a bad post. It's like you are trying to coach him or something and every time Radish names comes out and someone accused him of being scum you quickly defend him. Makes me think two are scum.

HoS Linkz

@ Radish

I am still waiting for an answer. I don't like Linkz answering for you.

VOTE: RADISH

I am not done yet.

@ Spurge

Are you really a Vig? I think we might needed it now because there are 9 players here left. If the mafia are 3 or 4 then we might lose after this day or the next day. Unless there are other factions in here. Who do you thinks are the scums BTW?

Now thinking this through I should Role claim now if Wonk is telling the truth and also if a mafia will be lynch or killed. I will be following him as well.
I am cop with a mafia sibling.
Night 1 I investigated Hat is townie
Linkz and baalz are not so with Linkz trying to defend Rad maybe a mafia aswell.

so who is your sibling?