By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - WWII Thread (How come the West never gives the Soviets the credit they deserve)

I've seen many WWII threads on here so i decided to make my own. How come Americans and British always ignore Soviet's role in ww2?

after all they fought 80% of the whole German army, they also lost more men than any other nation.  Majority of the German troops died in the East. I am fully aware about Stalin and his crimes against his own people, but you have to realize that most of the Russians weren't fighting the Nazis for Stalin! they fought the enemy to defend their homeland. The war in the East was much different than the West, Hitler viewed Russians as "Sub-Humans" he did not see any value in them. In fact he ordered all his generals to treat them harshly. That's a big mistake in my opinion, if Hitler was smart he would have treated the civilians really well so that way all the Russians would fight the Communist government.

I've notcied that many people from the West have little knowledge about the East, every time i ask them about the Soviets their response is always the same "They raped million of german women in berlin" or "they defeated the germans because of the weather".   I find them very ignorant. They have no idea how the Nazis treated the Soviet population. For every 1 dead german killed by the russian partisans, 100 russian civilians would be shot, and for every 1 wounded german  50 russians would be shot.  im talking about the occupied parts were the Partisans fought the Nazis. the death toll in soviet union by the end of ww2 was 28million there were hardly any russian family who did not lose a relative. And all i hear is how the soviets comitted crimes in Berlin.



I trust no one, not even myself.

Around the Network

In the U.S., we kind of fought a Cold War with Russia for 40 years, so we grew up to a history where the turning point of the War was D-Day rather than Stalingrad. You have to go out of your way to learn about how the Soviets could have won the war by themselves if necessary.



Love and tolerate.

Salnax said:
In the U.S., we kind of fought a Cold War with Russia for 40 years, so we grew up to a history where the turning point of the War was D-Day rather than Stalingrad.


That's true, and it's laughable because D-day was a piece of cake compared to the battles in the east. there were 10k german troops in normandy against 175k Allied troops.  I have a lot of respect for those who died in Normandy but i hate it when nobody pays any respect for those who died in Stalingrad. Stalingrad was the deadliest battle in history over 1 million russians died and close to 800k Axis powers - Romanians, Hungarians, Italians and Germans



I trust no one, not even myself.

FattyDingDong said:
Salnax said:
In the U.S., we kind of fought a Cold War with Russia for 40 years, so we grew up to a history where the turning point of the War was D-Day rather than Stalingrad.


That's true, and it's laughable because D-day was a piece of cake compared to the battles in the east. there were 10k german troops in normandy against 175k Allied troops.  I have a lot of respect for those who died in Normandy but i hate it when nobody pays any respect for those who died in Stalingrad. Stalingrad was the deadliest battle in history over 1 million russians died and close to 800k Axis powers - Romanians, Hungarians, Italians and Germans


Yeah, when you start mentioning numbers like those, people in America are honestly surprised. Most of the misconceptions are a negative side effect of politics, not willful ignorance.



Love and tolerate.

Read this book:
http://www.amazon.com/Icebreaker-Who-Started-Second-World/dp/0241126223/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1323558908&sr=8-3

It's written by a russian man.

There is absolutly no reason to give credit to the Soviets (like it's practiced by most german parities...sad:( ).

Yes, german and soviet soldiers fought a disgusting fight - on both sides. No card games or shared christmas in the trenchs during lull in the fighting like in WWI.

Without the support by USA with material, Stalin would have had lost the fight. Because Hitler attackt Soviets before Soviets were ready to attack not only Germany but whole Europ.

Its upside down: If ther is anybody how has to say thank you, then Soviets have to thank UK and USA!


UK wanted to destroy Germany, because of its rising economical power since 1900.
Thats the reason Churchill let become a limited conflict between Germany and Poland to becoming a WW.
Hilter never wanted to attack France or Britain or USA.
There were two rising powers and Churchill (only the balance of power and destruction of Germany in his mind) knew that he has to support the weaker of both ones - the Soviet Union. No matter what does it mean in the long run.

Churchill is most over - and misrated person in western history.
What is UK today?
Nearly no industrie and full of people from former colonies and on a good way to become the 51th state of the US - Congratulation!



 

 

"In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. There is no safe store of value..."

 

Alan Greenspan, 1967

Around the Network

Er... Maybe because some of these argument are right? The red army was the greatest blight to walk over the Earth since Gengis Khan. They raped and displaced millions, annexed whole countries into the hell they called a communist nation and no, no fucking nazi plan about exterminating the whole slav people or some crap along these lines give any justification for what they done.

Frankly, the USA and the west could have beaten the reich in their own should the URSS have lost, like they later did in the pacific. Just imagine if America had waited to attack Japan alongside the soviets. At best we would have a east-west german split in the region, at worst a twin Korea at the seas. Such is the legacy of the authoritarian rule who claimed to have something from the ideas of Marx when it did not remotely came close to what socialism ans communism stood for.



 

 

 

 

 

Phobos said:

Read this book:
http://www.amazon.com/Icebreaker-Who-Started-Second-World/dp/0241126223/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1323558908&sr=8-3

It's written by a russian man.

There is absolutly no reason to give credit to the Soviets (like it's practiced by most german parities...sad:( ).

Yes, german and soviet soldiers fought a disgusting fight - on both sides. No card games or shared christmas in the trenchs during lull in the fighting like in WWI.

Without the support by USA with material, Stalin would have had lost the fight. Because Hitler attackt Soviets before Soviets were ready to attack not only Germany but whole Europ.

Its upside down: If ther is anybody how has to say thank you, then Soviets have to thank UK and USA!


UK wanted to destroy Germany, because of its rising economical power since 1900.
Thats the reason Churchill let become a limited conflict between Germany and Poland to becoming a WW.
Hilter never wanted to attack France or Britain or USA.
There were two rising powers and Churchill (only the balance of power and destruction of Germany in his mind) knew that he has to support the weaker of both ones - the Soviet Union. No matter what does it mean in the long run.

Churchill is most over - and misrated person in western history.
What is UK today?
Nearly no industrie and full of people from former colonies and on a good way to become the 51th state of the US - Congratulation!

You're the most disrespectful ignorant idiotic person.  I'm not gonna click that link i dont care what some russian man said you go and believe him. Soviets don't deserve any respect? do you have any idea that if it wasn't for the Soviets the Nazis would have won the war.  Do you even know why Hitler chose to attack Soviet Union? it was part of the "Lebenstraum" plan to conquer the East and enslave all the Slavic people(Russians,Poles,Ukranians).  That's the reason why many russian civilians fought the German occupiers even though their own government was evil.  Yes the allies did send supplies to the Russians but it wasn;t enough it did help a little but it wasn;t that much. In fact the allies promised Stalin that they would open a second front in 1942 but they never did, then they promised that  they will open a second fron in 1943 yet again they lied.  They wanted the Soviets to completly destroy the Wehrmacht so by 1944 they would come and easily take over the western europe.  If teh Russians surrendered in 1941 then AMERICANS AND BRITISH WOULD OF BEEN IN A BIG TROUBLE!  so you should be thanking the Russian people for fighting and not surrendering. YOU  IGNORANT FOOL.



I trust no one, not even myself.

haxxiy said:
Er... Maybe because some of these argument are right? The red army was the greatest blight to walk over the Earth since Gengis Khan. They raped and displaced millions, annexed whole countries into the hell they called a communist nation and no, no fucking nazi plan about exterminating the whole slav people or some crap along these lines give any justification for what they done.

Frankly, the USA and the west could have beaten the reich in their own should the URSS have lost, like they later did in the pacific. Just imagine if America had waited to attack Japan alongside the soviets. At best we would have a east-west german split in the region, at worst a twin Korea at the seas. Such is the legacy of the authoritarian rule who claimed to have something from the ideas of Marx when it did not remotely came close to what socialism ans communism stood for.

So you're denying that Nazis planned "Lebenstraum"?
Listen you ignorant devil,  In Belarussia 1/3 of the population was slaughtered by the Nazi SS Einzatsgruppen. I am not defending the Soviet's actions against innocent people. I simply asking the west to give credit to the Russian people who fought the Nazi invaders.  Do you have any idea how strong the Wehrmacht was in 1941 - 1943?   the americans should thank the Russians for defeating the Nazis not the other way around. You are a ignorant fool.



I trust no one, not even myself.

FattyDingDong said:
haxxiy said:
Er... Maybe because some of these argument are right? The red army was the greatest blight to walk over the Earth since Gengis Khan. They raped and displaced millions, annexed whole countries into the hell they called a communist nation and no, no fucking nazi plan about exterminating the whole slav people or some crap along these lines give any justification for what they done.

Frankly, the USA and the west could have beaten the reich in their own should the URSS have lost, like they later did in the pacific. Just imagine if America had waited to attack Japan alongside the soviets. At best we would have a east-west german split in the region, at worst a twin Korea at the seas. Such is the legacy of the authoritarian rule who claimed to have something from the ideas of Marx when it did not remotely came close to what socialism ans communism stood for.

So you're denying that Nazis planned "Lebenstraum"?
Listen you ignorant devil,  In Belarussia 1/3 of the population was slaughtered by the Nazi SS Einzatsgruppen. I am not defending the Soviet's actions against innocent people. I simply asking the west to give credit to the Russian people who fought the Nazi invaders.  Do you have any idea how strong the Wehrmacht was in 1941 - 1943?   the americans should thank the Russians for defeating the Nazis not the other way around. You are a ignorant fool.

Irony is too strong in that phrase.

Plus, it's easier to always blame the Germans for everything. They are the devil, the culprits of everything. Well, until the Soviets appeared, and then it was the Muslims. Hope you see the trend.



Proud poster of the 10000th reply at the Official Smash Bros Update Thread.

tag - "I wouldn't trust gamespot, even if it was a live comparison."

Bets with Conegamer:

Pandora's Tower will have an opening week of less than 37k in Japan. (Won!)
Pandora's Tower will sell less than 100k lifetime in Japan.
Stakes: 1 week of avatar control for each one.

Fullfilled Prophecies

@ fatty ding dong

This book is one source - there are lot more, but you will not find neutral arguments in your schoolbook.

The written history is always written by the ruler...

It was a clash of two inhuman ideologys - Facism vs Communism. I have absolutly no respect for both of them.



 

 

"In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. There is no safe store of value..."

 

Alan Greenspan, 1967