By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Saints Row: The Third PS3 exclusive mode missing, Broken E3 promises continue

KylieDog said:
This is Microsoft being assholes again.

Microsoft dictating what SON¥ can or cannot provide their customers with? Oh, the humanity!



Around the Network
enditall727 said:
Ajescent said:
tooto123 said:
the biggest promise broken is AGENT

I knew that was never going to materialised when they only had a logo to show...

O_o wait hold on!!

Agent is still in development right?

 

OT: hmm i wonder what will be the next multiplat game ps3-exclusive-content confirmed this happens to next?

*looks over at Bioshock Infinite and SSX*


Apart from the logo, what else have we seen of it?



PS One/2/p/3slim/Vita owner. I survived the Apocalyps3/Collaps3 and all I got was this lousy signature.


Xbox One: What are you doing Dave?

RolStoppable said:
Persistantthug said:
RolStoppable said:

Going off your previous post, I then say Sony can't afford to charge lower royalty fees anymore. Doesn't change my point, but probably sounds better to you.

Right...Because Sony is broke.

 

I saw Kaz at the welfare office getting his welfare stamp card.  I would have taken pictures, but I don't take pictures with the common folk.

 

/sarcasm

Alright, explain to me why a third party publisher would forego giving the PS3 version of a multiplatform game a more or less worthless bonus that would net them a benefit when it comes to royalty fees.

It's more reasonable to assume that Sony says that they won't be offering benefits and that's why third parties (in this case THQ) make the 360 and PS3 version equal.

If Sony  (A ) can't or won't offer benefits , Who then came up with the extra content idea  and why was it announced in the first place ,it seems to me that  MS policy in regards to on disc content in the case of Battlefield 1943 saw that derailed , and in Saint Rows reversal , more along the lines of we are your biggest market, in both cases what was being offered wasn't a big enough deal or had any real gains to offset  damaging relations with MS , The problem seems to stem from  the companys involved thinking that this was small potatos and they didn't expect a backlash.



Research shows Video games  help make you smarter, so why am I an idiot

d21lewis said:
I'm cool with that. I'm getting the 360 version tomorrow. SR1 was one of the best reasons to own a 360, back in the day. 360 fans made it a huge hit. Why hurt the loyal users who've bought the series since day 1 or cut content for the biggest userbase in their biggest market?

I'm glad they broke their promise but it would have been better if they didn't make promises they couldn't keep.

I'd figure the Metal Gear Solid HD Collection would keep you busy enough.



Ajescent said:
enditall727 said:
Ajescent said:
tooto123 said:
the biggest promise broken is AGENT

I knew that was never going to materialised when they only had a logo to show...

O_o wait hold on!!

Agent is still in development right?

 

OT: hmm i wonder what will be the next multiplat game ps3-exclusive-content confirmed this happens to next?

*looks over at Bioshock Infinite and SSX*


Apart from the logo, what else have we seen of it?

--> http://www.vg247.com/2011/08/15/environment-artists-profile-reveals-first-agent-screenshots/

and idk why they stated that they are not sure if Agent is stil PS3 exclusive.

if im not mistaken, Agent is owned by Sony



Around the Network

This is only two games, AC Revelations still comes with AC1



reviniente said:
d21lewis said:
I'm cool with that. I'm getting the 360 version tomorrow. SR1 was one of the best reasons to own a 360, back in the day. 360 fans made it a huge hit. Why hurt the loyal users who've bought the series since day 1 or cut content for the biggest userbase in their biggest market?

I'm glad they broke their promise but it would have been better if they didn't make promises they couldn't keep.

I'd figure the Metal Gear Solid HD Collection would keep you busy enough.


Yeah, you'd think that......but like Galactus, my hunger is nigh insatiable.  I've already got Smackdown lined up for next Tuesday and Zelda on the 20th....and Mario Kart in December.  Then, and only then, will I be satisfied.

 

Until Mass Effect, Tomb Rader, Devil May Cry, Kid Icarus, blah, blah, blah, blah.........



RolStoppable said:
Persistantthug said:
RolStoppable said:

Going off your previous post, I then say Sony can't afford to charge lower royalty fees anymore. Doesn't change my point, but probably sounds better to you.

Right...Because Sony is broke.

 

I saw Kaz at the welfare office getting his welfare stamp card.  I would have taken pictures, but I don't take pictures with the common folk.

 

/sarcasm

Alright, explain to me why a third party publisher would forego giving the PS3 version of a multiplatform game a more or less worthless bonus that would net them a benefit when it comes to royalty fees.

It's more reasonable to assume that Sony says that they won't be offering benefits and that's why third parties (in this case THQ) make the 360 and PS3 version equal.

 

 

It could be a simple measure of "We don't want to alienate either side of our fanbase".

 

Business wise, that makes great sense....does it not?   For THQ, Why potentially piss off and antagonize people whom you depend on to pay your bills and keep you in business?



PearlJam said:
If Sony hadn't spent so many millions and millions of dollars in the 90's moneyhatting Nintendo and Sega into the ground, they wouldn't be broke and could buy their way to the top again. This is karma for all the shit they used to get away with when they had $40 Billion+ and Nintendo had about $1 Billion, Sega had even less money. Sony brought all this dirty shit into the console business and now there's a bigger asshole in town with deeper pockets.

Serves them right.


Yup, I knew Karma would strike back sooner or later. All the shit they did in the 90s and it's all coming back to them: They lost all exclusive DLC of some weak, low-selling, GTA rip-off. Haha! Karma's a BITCH!

Persistantthug said:
MrBubbles said:
some of you people are stupid. microsoft just cant magically change other peoples contracts and agreements.


You're not following, MrBubbles.

 

 

What Microsoft can do, is threaten to not allow said title on their console.

That threat in and of itself can, and likely will, inspire removal of exclusive content.

did you guys forget assassin's creed revelations