By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - What Will Happen With PlayStation 4 Next Generation?

enditall727 said:

Okay, Gran Turismo 6's confirmation has driven me to make this thread

1st and foremost PLEASE GOD LET GT6 BE FOR PS4!!!

Now it is quite obvious that Sony is known for releasing their Playstation platforms IN competition. What do i mean by this you ask? well the 5th generation was already being lead by the Sega Saturn before the PlayStation was brought to the market. The 6th Generation was already being lead by the Sega Dreamcast before the PlayStation 2 was brought to the market and the 7th Generation(present) was already being lead by the Xbox 360 before the PlayStation 3 was brought to the market. PlayStation Portable and PlayStation Vita included.

Now being that the successor to Nintendo's Nintendo Wii(Wii U) is well on it's way and is undoubtedly going to begin the 8th Generation of gaming next year in 2012, i am almost 100% positive that Sony is going to bring PlayStation 4 to the market right behind the Wii U in 2013 like we have seen in previous Generations. I also see Microsoft releasing the next Xbox in 2013. Yea that's right, i said it! I think the PlayStation 4 will release in the same year as the next Xbox NOT after it like some people think. I dont see Sony releasing the PlayStation 4 2 whole years after the Generation starts. *lifts shoulders*

 

I'm really starting to doubt whether spending my time reading these forums is worthwhile.

One of the worst openings to an OP I've seen.

...Just calling a spade a spade.



Around the Network

I already said this on another thread:

PS4 needs to have EXTERNAL GPU support!!

Make a good system with a very good CPU and a average GPU. After 2-4 years, Sony should release a external GPU that would massacrate X720 in graphics.
See how nowadays a cheap GPU is superior than PS3/X360 ones...

That way, PS4 can have a similar price than its competitors, but enthusiast gamers also have the option to pay more and get more power. That extra power would be determined by the deveoper and should be easy to implement. For example, better resolution, better fps, better 3D should be easy to implement. For 1st party developers, they could expand more in the idea and maybe offer better textures, better physics and better lightning.

Unless making an external port to the PS4 mainboard is THAT expensive, I don't see why this should not be made.
I would probably not buy this immediately, but maybe some years after getting PS4. However everyone should be sattisfied.



Dr.Grass said:
enditall727 said:

Okay, Gran Turismo 6's confirmation has driven me to make this thread

1st and foremost PLEASE GOD LET GT6 BE FOR PS4!!!

Now it is quite obvious that Sony is known for releasing their Playstation platforms IN competition. What do i mean by this you ask? well the 5th generation was already being lead by the Sega Saturn before the PlayStation was brought to the market. The 6th Generation was already being lead by the Sega Dreamcast before the PlayStation 2 was brought to the market and the 7th Generation(present) was already being lead by the Xbox 360 before the PlayStation 3 was brought to the market. PlayStation Portable and PlayStation Vita included.

Now being that the successor to Nintendo's Nintendo Wii(Wii U) is well on it's way and is undoubtedly going to begin the 8th Generation of gaming next year in 2012, i am almost 100% positive that Sony is going to bring PlayStation 4 to the market right behind the Wii U in 2013 like we have seen in previous Generations. I also see Microsoft releasing the next Xbox in 2013. Yea that's right, i said it! I think the PlayStation 4 will release in the same year as the next Xbox NOT after it like some people think. I dont see Sony releasing the PlayStation 4 2 whole years after the Generation starts. *lifts shoulders*

 

I'm really starting to doubt whether spending my time reading these forums is worthwhile.

One of the worst openings to an OP I've seen.

...Just calling a spade a spade.

woah woah WOAH!

lol

im not a master at making threads so relax

but hey you can criticise me all you want about it though because i still consider myself a rookie :)

and believe it or not there are some people who actually thought that Sony launched 1st the 5th and 6th generation.

but feel free to let me know about any other mistakes i've made if you would like :)



NotStan said:

I don't see it.

Sony has reported losses 4 consecutive years in a row as a company - although PS may turn profit, it's not big enough to nullify the losses in other departments, which are most likely affecting financials of the company as a whole, and with the Vita launch around the corner and most likely loss per unit, I don't see Sony making enough money to BUILD the console or being afford another launch till at least 2014 - Maybe when Vita becomes more profitable and the profits are squeezed out of PS3.

 

GT6 is likely as a launch title, but it'll definitely be there within a year of launch.


yes the PSVita will launch at a loss

it will cost Sony $310 to make the Vita but they will sell it at $250.

The $310 cost to make Vita will drop down to $280 by 2013

they make up for those losses with the software profits

but Sony's having the PSP around will also cancel out some of that loss at PSVita's launch



sales2099 said:
enditall727 said:
sales2099 said:
enditall727 said:

 

and LOL dont give in to that PolyphonyDigital "perfectionist" crap. Polyphony shot GT5 Prologue out quick and it showed that they knew what they were doing with the ps3. i believe they were just riding out the whole Turn10's Forza 2 and 3. They looked at what Turn10 was doing and just simply out-did what they knew Turn10 could achieve on 360(1000 cars,weather,nascar,night/day cycle etc). Forza 4 proves what PolyphonyDigital was aiming for(seeing as how Turn10 was not able to outdo gt5 in those areas even though it came out later)

as far as sony making 2 dumb moves with PSVita.. okay tell me this, name 1 time that Sony released 1 of it's platforms before it's competitor? *crickets* exactly NEVER! They ALWAYS release IN competition!! I said it right there in the OP! On them missing the Na/Eu Holiday season i guess they dont want to "rush" anything like the way we seen Nintendo rush the 3DS

So your saying PD waits for Forza to make a move before acting? Thats not the behaviour of the supposed king of simulation......usually its they who should set the example. Thats why I don't buy it. Simply put, PS3 was a bitch to program for and they lost track of time, occasionally tweaking the game based on Forza 2 and Forza 3 features. But cmon there was little outdoing in the end. 3 Forzas, all 90+ on metacritic compared to one full GT game with a 84. They nailed some parts like the night and day cycles, but they still lacked a lot of features that Forza has. And cmon, 1000 cars. Its common sense 800 of them arent worth driving, even with the spec 2 update. 

I think Sony should rethink their launch strategies. Launching after Sega and still winning just ain't gonna cut it anymore. Today, launching later = loose. I see no reason to not rush the Vita.....trading lack of launch games for a holiday launch. Like the 3d......launching rushed leads to a head start, and room to grow and improve. Nintendo ironed out most of the 3DS kinks..........before the Vita even released. Thats the magic of a head start, rushed or not 

this has to be like the 5th time i've seen you make this claim but you never seem to be able to name them...

for gt5 i can think of dynamic weather - rain, snow etc, more race types like rally, F1, go karting etc, day-night transitions, course maker etc

for forza for the most part all i can think of is the livery editor, autovista and kinect integration



Around the Network
Jazz2K said:
I also wonder what Sony will do next gen because I think things will be a lot more different next gen than what we're used to. It's not like we'll be getting 3 consoles that are almost the same like every generations had. This time, the 3 consoles might take different directions. The only one we don't know much about is the PS4.

We know MS will release the next Xbox with a better version of Kinect and because it "should" come out with every consoles every games will build around the new Kinect, just like they did with XBox Live. We also know about Windows 8 that's supposed to bring more life to PC gaming, the new Windows for tablets and phones we'll see how they implement everything together. I don't think we need to worry much for MS, unless we still care for Japan.

On Sony's side... I don't know. No new medium technology needs to be adopted except for onlive gaming but we all know that's not what they want right away.

Motion gaming is already out and full body tracking is already adopted through Kinect.

Making it super powerful? Why? So it is too difficult to develop for again? And costs a lot too? Next gen we'll see even more game engines being reused that what happened this gen with UE3. Graphics are not what sells games, next gen will see not only impressive graphics but we'll come to a point where it'll start to be beautiful enough so people will not care anymore (it has already started)... I'm not talking about fanboys on forums.

I really have no Idea.


Sony made the ps3 difficult to grasp/develop for because they didn't want any developers taking advantage of it too early in it's cycle

even the ps3 dev kits were the most expensive

i remember at Sony's E3 2008(if im not mistaken) they announced that they would cut the ps3 dev kit price's by 80%



enditall727 said:
NotStan said:

I don't see it.

Sony has reported losses 4 consecutive years in a row as a company - although PS may turn profit, it's not big enough to nullify the losses in other departments, which are most likely affecting financials of the company as a whole, and with the Vita launch around the corner and most likely loss per unit, I don't see Sony making enough money to BUILD the console or being afford another launch till at least 2014 - Maybe when Vita becomes more profitable and the profits are squeezed out of PS3.

 

GT6 is likely as a launch title, but it'll definitely be there within a year of launch.


yes the PSVita will launch at a loss

it will cost Sony $310 to make the Vita but they will sell it at $250.

The $310 cost to make Vita will drop down to $280 by 2013

they make up for those losses with the software profits

but Sony's having the PSP around will also cancel out some of that loss at PSVita's launch

That still doesn't negate the fact that the other divisions - such as TV etc are far from profitable, not even breaking even. Where do you think they'd get the capital to launch a console when they've been losing money the last 4 years?

Hence my point, until financial situation improves with Sony, they'll likely delay launch as long as possible - the only people that actually want the next generation to come are the fanboys, so they can have bragging power, I highly doubt that the corporations such as Microsoft and Sony are in a rush to bring new console out, although MS is in a better position to launch a new console than Sony is at the moment.

You know corporations don't have access to unlimited amount of money, and I am genuinely surprised Sony can carry on spending money such as on the Ericsson deal when they're making a loss.



Disconnect and self destruct, one bullet a time.

sales2099 said:
enditall727 said:
sales2099 said:
enditall727 said:

 

and LOL dont give in to that PolyphonyDigital "perfectionist" crap. Polyphony shot GT5 Prologue out quick and it showed that they knew what they were doing with the ps3. i believe they were just riding out the whole Turn10's Forza 2 and 3. They looked at what Turn10 was doing and just simply out-did what they knew Turn10 could achieve on 360(1000 cars,weather,nascar,night/day cycle etc). Forza 4 proves what PolyphonyDigital was aiming for(seeing as how Turn10 was not able to outdo gt5 in those areas even though it came out later)

as far as sony making 2 dumb moves with PSVita.. okay tell me this, name 1 time that Sony released 1 of it's platforms before it's competitor? *crickets* exactly NEVER! They ALWAYS release IN competition!! I said it right there in the OP! On them missing the Na/Eu Holiday season i guess they dont want to "rush" anything like the way we seen Nintendo rush the 3DS

So your saying PD waits for Forza to make a move before acting? Thats not the behaviour of the supposed king of simulation......usually its they who should set the example. Thats why I don't buy it. Simply put, PS3 was a bitch to program for and they lost track of time, occasionally tweaking the game based on Forza 2 and Forza 3 features. But cmon there was little outdoing in the end. 3 Forzas, all 90+ on metacritic compared to one full GT game with a 84. They nailed some parts like the night and day cycles, but they still lacked a lot of features that Forza has. And cmon, 1000 cars. Its common sense 800 of them arent worth driving, even with the spec 2 update. 

I think Sony should rethink their launch strategies. Launching after Sega and still winning just ain't gonna cut it anymore. Today, launching later = loose. I see no reason to not rush the Vita.....trading lack of launch games for a holiday launch. Like the 3d......launching rushed leads to a head start, and room to grow and improve. Nintendo ironed out most of the 3DS kinks..........before the Vita even released. Thats the magic of a head start, rushed or not 


yea Forza got those 90+'s on metacritic easily early on because Turn10 had no competition earlier this gen

the best driving simulator that released before Forza 2 was *drumrolls* Gran Turismo 4(which was on a last gen console)!

 and we all know that Gran Turismo 5 didn't release until after Forza 3 came out

look the only people who ever complained about ps3 being hard to develop for were people who had worked on 360(3rd party developers)

i remember 1 3rd party developer was explaining some things about ps3 and why it is more complex to develop for than other platforms

he was saying something about the ps3's divided ram and since it is divided into 2 parts that when you are using 1 section of the ram the other section will bite you in the a** if you do something specific but i cant really remember though

it kinda made sense because 360 has 1 whole 512 mb of ram and PS3 has 256 mb of system ram and another 256 mb of video ram

now if somebody like a Sony 1st party dev ONLY works on ps3 tell me how exactly would they find it to be hard to develop for if the ps3 is all they know?  how would they know that ps3 is difficult to develop for if they never even worked on something like the 360?

you should think about things before you say them man

and also lets say a regular person who owns ps3 and 360 goes to the store and is browsing for a racing game. Lets say that they just so happened to pick up Forza and Gran Turismo,reads the back and goes off of that information(which most people do for all games). Which game do you think they would pick? would they pick the 1 that has Nascar, night/day cycle, track editor, dynamic weather or would they pick the other one that doesn't have that stuff? clearly they would pick the game with the most content

it is what it is, you can say what you want about GT and Forza but Polyphony outdid Turn10's Forza games this gen with GT5 *lifts shoulders*



sales2099 said:
enditall727 said:
The_Joker_Product said:
enditall727 said:
The_Joker_Product said:

 

 

This is the best Microsoft will EVER do against Sony!

This comment caught my eye and made me smile. I wouldn't be so sure of that. 

Compare PS2 to Xbox lifetime sales.

Now look at PS3 and 360 lifetime sales.

Sure theres many factors to consider but im keeping it as simple as possible here. Seems MS is improving each gen where as Sony is loosing its grip. 


hmm.. i think somebody has forgotten who Sony Computer Entertainment is

i know they made some dumb decisions but let me bring you back up to speed on this company this gen really quick

okay i know that this saying has gotten cliche but it is what it is, the PS3's pricing KILLED IT in basically every way possible

now im sure you know that games make a console right? ok

do you remember that list of Sony's 15 cancelled PS3 games that popped up a while back?

well here it is again --> http://gamingbolt.com/15-cancelled-ps-3-games-that-should-have-never-been-cancelled

i believe there were a few other cancelled ps3 games that did not get mentioned in that list if im not mistaken

but i want you to think about that for a second. Just imagine what it would be like right now if there were FIF-FUCKING-TEEN more exclusive franchises on PS3 right now like there was supposed to be. Not to mention that most of them WOULD HAVE gotten sequels

and we all know that most games get better by the sequel  :)

^^^but that's just 1 thing

now what about the games that were originally going to be PS3 exclusive? The Devil May Cry's, Final Fantasy's, Tekken's and if im not mistaken weren't games like Grand Theft Auto, Asassins Creed and Resident Evil going to be only on ps3? im almost certain all of them were

now also imagine if those games weren't on 360 right now and they were only on ps3 like it was originally going to be.

and i dont want to here none of that "oh i dont care about those games" because microsoft wouldn't have tried so hard to get them if they didn't care about them :)

they would have lost MAJOR market share in America and the rest of the world from these alone ESPECIALLY Grand Theft Auto(maybe not so much with Asassins Creed because it was not really a known franchise at the time)

if Grand Theft Auto would have stayed exclusive back in 08 then the ps3 would be selling more in America each week right now and the gap would be extremely smaller than it is at the moment. Sony would be right behind if not ahead of Microsoft in America right now just by GTA alone

do you understand what im telling you? Sony's original plan with the PS3 was to damn-near dreamcast the 360 if you get my drift

but that plan 100% back fired on Sony. why did it back fire you ask?? *another drumroll* the price!

the price was just to damn high! Not only was it damn high  but they STILL were losing 200 F**KING DOLLARS each sale!

$200 is way too much money to lose each sale!

now i always thought that Sony were freaking idiots to let microsoft get exclusive dlc with Grand theft Auto but Sony really couldn't do anything about it. Sony was already losing $200 each ps3 sale so it's obvious that they didn't have much money to throw around and keep competitive with

all those other games could have stayed exclusive if Sony just payed the devs to keep them exclusive but of course it's obvious why they did not have any money to throw around so they were all lost

now ps3's high a** price of course made the ps3 have the image of not selling software so this also didn't help with developers having faith in staying ps3 exclusive

and Sony ALSO couldn't continue to support most of the developers who were making exclusive games for the PS3 so of course most of the games got canceled. I mean that $200 loss EACH sale had to go somewhere

and as for the people at microsoft, i bet everybody over there's balls jiggled when all this stuff happened with Sony this generation

 

6th Generation of Gaming: Sony completely dismantled there competition with the PlayStation 2

7th Generation of Gaming: Sony completely dismantled THERE DAMN SELVES with the PlayStation 3 simply due to it's price

i dont see Sony shooting themselves in the foot with the PlayStation 4's price next generation ..they already confirmed it :)

now i shall say this again

This is the best Microsoft will EVER do against Sony!

EDIT: O_o woah! i just noticed that i've written a giant wall of text lol ..i dont think i will be doing this again =P



Most likely if Sony gets them selves back to the way they were with the PSX.They will blow every console out of the market.If Sony is smart enough they should wait 1 year again.Wait for the 360 to come out then release the PS4.
Oh and I can already feel the launch titles.
God of War 4 please!