By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - What is your dream car?



Stop hate, let others live the life they were given. Everyone has their problems, and no one should have to feel ashamed for the way they were born. Be proud of who you are, encourage others to be proud of themselves. Learn, research, absorb everything around you. Nothing is meaningless, a purpose is placed on everything no matter how you perceive it. Discover how to love, and share that love with everything that you encounter. Help make existence a beautiful thing.

Kevyn B Grams
10/03/2010 

KBG29 on PSN&XBL

Around the Network

Datsun 240/260/280z

1985 Hilux - something like this:
http://www.roughtrax4x4.com/media.php?file=1345

A big powerful new car would be nice but I just don't see myself in them.



Hmm, pie.

This. :)



Alby_da_Wolf said:
Michael-5 said:

I also like light cars, but the corvette feels like shit inside. Fast as hell, press the gas and your red lining and going 60km/h in an instant. Thank god I test drove the auto when I did. However because of the crap build quality, I would never buy one.

You are lucky to live in europe. There are no Alfa Romeo's here in Canada, well no modern ones. My pop also used to own a sick ass V8 Benz, but I think Rear or Mid engine is the way to go. Never drove a mid/rear engine car before, but I sat inside the Lotus Elise and Evora before, and the driving position just feels so right.

To me what matters most is not how fast the car is in a stright line, but how fun it is to drive, even at slow speeds. To be honest, I prefer to drive a crazy car like the older 911's and old lamborshini's. It's so much funner knowing that pressing the gas pedal can make your car end up spinning. I know in racing sim's, and in real life, getting the ass out just a bit is fun as hell, and that's why I want an engine behind me. I just want something that needs skill to drive, but if you have skill, the car is capable.

About the interiors, I'm used to Fiat, Opel and Ford city cars, a Corvette couldn't scare me! And the last Alfa Romeo my dad owned had terrible build quality anyway, despite the excellent mechanics.

About RWD, rear engine, the only ones I drove were very old Italian city cars, like Autobianchi Bianchina and Fiat 126, their engines were to weak to obtain power oversteering, unless in very low grip conditions, and their reactions in limit conditions were quite nasty.

I should try a Porsche before deciding, everyone I know that has or had one is satisfied even of those from 30 years ago, the really nasty ones were even older, and killed countless people, as, like those old city cars, but in this case with a lot more HP's, the switch between underseering and oversteering was quite unpredictable for drivers not yet used to them (older Porsches had a higher % of their mass BEHIND the rear axle, making them very different not only from forward engine ones, but also from central and rear-central ones), but up until now I'd prefer forward engine, RWD for the fun and all forward for practical and relaxing use, and they can be fun too, my mom, after the everlasting old Opel of my grandpa and her first, boring and ugly, but reliable one, disappointed by her second unreliable one switched to a Citroën C3, and it's a nice car to drive, considering it's just a large city car.

Ah, and except dream sportcars, for normal use and normal fun I prefer turbodiesel engines, I like high torque at low RPM and I like to save some euros on fuel too, that in EU, and particularly in Italy, is horribly expensive, shopping at hard discounts we can find some decent, even protected designation of origin, wines cheaper  (some "Castelli Romani" in 1.5 and 2.0 liter bottles, just to name one, although the best Castelli Romani are slightly more expensive than fuel).

About your considerations on fun driving, totally agree, although rear traction is a more essential ingredient than having rear engine too to obtain power oversteering, while with forward traction, unless you're driving a rally car, tuned to obtain more oversteering when needed even if they are all forward, you need to use car balance, steering wheel, brakes and engine brake to get a little oversteering, so you can obtain it only while slowing down, it's useful too for fast turns, and even amusing, but not as rear traction power one.


Chevy build quality <<<<<<<< When I test drove  the corvette, a new car, the seat and door handle were already broken. Driving a corvette at slow speed is like driving the crapiest of the crapiest 80's American sedans. They are fast, but they are cheap for a reason.

Yea, modern Porsches are almost Mid Engined. Over time they have shoved that engine close and close to the rear axel. I have never drove one, but from my experience driving racing sims and in real life, it takes too much power to oversteer in a V8 front engine RWD car. However if I drive the 911 and find out I don't like it, I'll look into a hardtop Lotus Evora, or a BMW M3. Can't afford any of them for a while anyway, just a dream, and with gas going up and up, this will likely be my only good gas powered car.

You're lucky in Europe to even get diesels. Only Merc and Volkswagen offer diesels in Canada, and since Volkswagons are made in Mexico here (which kills build quality), we don't get many options at the low end of the price spectrum. I wish BMW and Honda sold their diesels in Canada If they did, or volkswagon were made like they are in Europe, I'd likely have gotten a diesel myself.

Out of curiousity, order these features out of what is most important for a fun car. Power, RWD, Engine Layout, Build Quality, Driving Position, Appearance, and Exclusivity. Just wondering because most people I know have a different order of what's important.

For me it's Build Quality, Power, Driving Position, RWD, Engine Layout, Appearance, then Exclusivity. However I know a lot of people who put RWD first. Like you said about underpowered mid engined cars though, they are not fun, and I can tell you the same logic applies to old weak BMWs/benz,



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results

Smeags said:

Dodge Viper SRT10 *sniffle*

i always new you had great taste. me to or any viper would do me just fine. i just hope the redeign isn't that drastic of a change.



Around the Network

Ferrari F40, i love this legend.

 



Lamborghini Aventador

Murcielago was my all time favorite but i wouldn't buy a car like this used and Lamb did a good job with Aventador.

Runners up
SLR 722
Lexus LFA
Ferrari 458 italia (never did like ferrari but this one sounds like a new kind of car, and i like it)
Honda S2000
old re done dodge challenger (the new one is also very cool)



Proudest Platinums - BF: Bad Company, Killzone 2 , Battlefield 3 and GTA4

F40 great car. A friend and me stole one out of the garage of his uncle and took it for a spin. We were young (and seriously brain damaged) and the car was too much for us to handle we returned it and noone ever knew.



Michael-5 said:


Chevy build quality <<<<<<<< When I test drove  the corvette, a new car, the seat and door handle were already broken. Driving a corvette at slow speed is like driving the crapiest of the crapiest 80's American sedans. They are fast, but they are cheap for a reason.

Yea, modern Porsches are almost Mid Engined. Over time they have shoved that engine close and close to the rear axel. I have never drove one, but from my experience driving racing sims and in real life, it takes too much power to oversteer in a V8 front engine RWD car. However if I drive the 911 and find out I don't like it, I'll look into a hardtop Lotus Evora, or a BMW M3. Can't afford any of them for a while anyway, just a dream, and with gas going up and up, this will likely be my only good gas powered car.

You're lucky in Europe to even get diesels. Only Merc and Volkswagen offer diesels in Canada, and since Volkswagons are made in Mexico here (which kills build quality), we don't get many options at the low end of the price spectrum. I wish BMW and Honda sold their diesels in Canada If they did, or volkswagon were made like they are in Europe, I'd likely have gotten a diesel myself.

Out of curiousity, order these features out of what is most important for a fun car. Power, RWD, Engine Layout, Build Quality, Driving Position, Appearance, and Exclusivity. Just wondering because most people I know have a different order of what's important.

For me it's Build Quality, Power, Driving Position, RWD, Engine Layout, Appearance, then Exclusivity. However I know a lot of people who put RWD first. Like you said about underpowered mid engined cars though, they are not fun, and I can tell you the same logic applies to old weak BMWs/benz,

I was envying Americans for getting Volkswagens so cheaper than here, but now I understand, the ones they sell here are rock solid and high quality, except that crappy Fox, built in Brazil, that has also jurassic engines that drink more fuel than far bigger and faster VW models. About Chevrolets, Corvette and Camaro are the only ones I'd ever buy, and I don't like GM's in general, Opel too heavily disappointed me when it lost its legendary reliability (my maternal grandpa's 1973, model year 1966, Kadett still works, despite having been used on bad country roads in the last 23 years, we don't use it anymore only because we can't find anymore shoes for its drum brakes).

About important factors, for me build quality is important regarding mechanics, less regarding body and interiors (as long as equipment isn't faulty and body doesn't get pierced by rust. I drove my dad's old Fiat Uno Diesel many years ago, they left the engine supports unchanged, the same as those for the far lighter gasoline engine, so after suffering country roads and all the holes and bumps in my town's roads for 70000km, the engine fell to the ground three times before we eventually changed the car, but the engine never suffered, apart some lube and cooling pipes torn.

So my list for a fun car, also considering that driving a 911long  enough I could learn it enough to fully enjoy it, could be:

1) almost equally at the first place: Mechanics, Electrics and Electronics Build Quality, Lightness, Power/Weight Ratio, Driving Position

2) RWD (not amongst the first features as there ARE also fun FWD cars), Engine Layout (but in a forward engine, RWD, having the engine forward-central, like in BMW's, forward engine Ferrari's, Viper the Corvette is very important and beneficial both for traction and handling) and Body and Interiors Quality

3) Appearance (but there are some cars ugly, for my tastes, beyond my toleration, like VW Fox)

4) last, far behind, I'd say not even considered: Exclusivity, I really don't care about it, it's for insecure people that won't ever really be happy of what they have even if they become rich.

Final note: I'd like an extended authonomy electric car made this way, a generator run by a small, light twin cyl high efficiency diesel engine, batteries with enough capacity for short range trips at most a few tens km, but not too heavy, and four independent electric motors, one per wheel, making possible traction and stability control and torque vectoring without using the brakes, so avoiding their unnecessary wear, leaving them at maximum efficiency whenever needed and even recovering energy, instead of wasting it.



Stwike him, Centuwion. Stwike him vewy wuffly! (Pontius Pilate, "Life of Brian")
A fart without stink is like a sky without stars.
TGS, Third Grade Shooter: brand new genre invented by Kevin Butler exclusively for Natal WiiToo Kinect. PEW! PEW-PEW-PEW! 
 


kowenicki said:

my wife had one...  it was shit.

it wasnt really, but the fact that she preferred her BMW120d msport speaks volumes.

The Nissan 370Z and 300ZX for the time are much better. However the BMW 1 series is also insane value for price.



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results