Guilty people don't collapse into tears, as genuinely as Amanda Knox did, when a court finally decides they're innocent. Guilty people bow their heads, smile, and try to look like a vindicaed. Whatever Amanda Knox might be guilty of, murder isn't one of them.... you know.... and then there's the whole 'no proof' thing. That's kind of a big one. Idiots.

The DNA evidence quite clearly indicates that she was innocent. Really no doubt exists.

ggrrraaawwwwrrrrrr.

OT - to those claiming she got away with murder what evidence is there that she did it?  i haven't followed the facts at all but what i've heard second hand suggests there isn't any actual evidence convict her on but rather that everything is circumstantial.

Breaking News

Foxy Knoxy and OJ "The Glove Dont Fit" Simpson to duet on Christmas Single for holidays 2011

Double A side of "JailHouse Rock" and "Love in the First Degree"

First thousand orders get a signed Amanda Knox - "Cartwheeling in Jail" Book and an OJ one size dont fit all glove.

Order now while stocks last.

Because she admitted it, after which she changed her testimony several times, and tried to frame an innocent man (who she now has to pay for slander).

WOW, you sure are easy to fool. Oh, and before you call other people idiots you should know that she initially confessed to taking part in the murder, and then changed her story several times, and tried to frame an innocent person.

Well, she's back in the US, meaning she will never return to Italy even if she is needed as a witness or if the prosecution succeeds in their appeal against this ruling.

She'll also profit from this poor girls death. I hope she gives much of that money to charity or the Kercher's.

that doesn't mean guilty. People get coaxed into guilty verdict often.  

Knox's lawyers argued that her purported confession to being in the house during the killing was not true, claiming she had made the admission under no sleep and extreme duress and stress. 

The prosecution didn't do they're job or she is indeed not guilty. if they had any other evidence other than possibly a "police coerced confession" The evidence was faulty. And the motive was "she killed for no reason at all."

whether you liked it or not, or whether you like her or not. this isn't sufficient evidence. And it's italy's court so whot he hell knows what they do there. The only one with evidence is guede.

The problem is is that unlike the other 2. Gued has evidence against him. And His prison time was reduced in half for implicating the other 2 but this was after changing his story as well which resulted in his prison sentence getting cut in half.

Kacey anthony hid her burried child, and had a 200,000$ search, to find a child she knew was dead. This isn't in the same category really, other then both prosecuters possibly sucking.

On another note. Unless you're john lennon. I think the public remembers the killer more than the person who was killed. 

Didn't she say she was abused and coerced into confessing involvement? And as I said in my first post, being guilty of slander doesn't mean she's a murderer. That's just silly.

Why would she possibly do that? She'll spend that money luring other girls so she can kill them.