By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ishiki on 05 October 2011
Edit Thread
sapphi_snake said:
kennyrester said:
This is one of those stories where there's so much nonsense written about it from both sides that it's hard to know what to think. To the OP though, you seem pretty convinced Knox is guilty, why?

As far as I can see the collapse of the case against her, particularly the DNA evidence shows that she can't be guilty beyond reasonable doubt. The victim's dad said it was a disgrace because it couldn't just have been the guy already serving time, citing the two knives and 40-odd stab wounds. Sure, this shows there was probably more than one killer but doesn't prove it was Knox.

All that said, the people cheering her on seem to have conveniently forgotten the slander conviction, which at least shows she's a nasty piece of work, murderer or not.

Because she admitted it, after which she changed her testimony several times, and tried to frame an innocent man (who she now has to pay for slander).

that doesn't mean guilty. People get coaxed into guilty verdict often.  

Knox's lawyers argued that her purported confession to being in the house during the killing was not true, claiming she had made the admission under no sleep and extreme duress and stress. 

The prosecution didn't do they're job or she is indeed not guilty. if they had any other evidence other than possibly a "police coerced confession" The evidence was faulty. And the motive was "she killed for no reason at all."

whether you liked it or not, or whether you like her or not. this isn't sufficient evidence. And it's italy's court so whot he hell knows what they do there. The only one with evidence is guede.

The problem is is that unlike the other 2. Gued has evidence against him. And His prison time was reduced in half for implicating the other 2 but this was after changing his story as well which resulted in his prison sentence getting cut in half.

Kacey anthony hid her burried child, and had a 200,000$ search, to find a child she knew was dead. This isn't in the same category really, other then both prosecuters possibly sucking.


On another note. Unless you're john lennon. I think the public remembers the killer more than the person who was killed.