these are some very impressive graphics, but as SvennoJ pointed out, what's going on on-screen I think has actually decreased over the generation
these are some very impressive graphics, but as SvennoJ pointed out, what's going on on-screen I think has actually decreased over the generation
That ME2 shot either looks like a bullshot or a PC screen shot.
“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."
Jimi Hendrix
okay, 2006 to 2007 was the biggest gap.............
3DS: tolu619
Wii U: FoyehBoys
Vita, PS3 and PS4: FoyehBoys
XBoxOne: Tolu619
Switch: Tolu619
Kugali - We publish comics from all across Africa and the diaspora, and we also push the boundaries of Augmented Reality storytelling. Check us out!
I realized how much graphics have improved after going back to play Star Wars: The Force Unleashed on PS3. I couldn't believe my eyes when I saw E3 footage back in 2008. I came back to gaming partly thanks to the hype I got from that game, Wii version. I played and enjoyed the game. Later I got a PS3 and I was shocked with Uncharted and other games. Later I got a nice PC (just something middle ranged these days) and I got kind of used to full hd graphics.
A couple of months ago I got me a copy of SW:TFU for PS3, just for the sake of playing the HD experience and the different levels and... even the cinematics look weak!!
Talking about changing standards..!
osamanobama said:
i would venture to say killzone 2 looks much better than that. infact look at the gun in the e3 trailer (the picture you posted), then look at this (yes its ingame) |
That has to be a bullshot because it looks better than KZ3...
Machina said:
Doesn't mean they're not bullshots. If it's not what you see in-game then it's as good as fake imo. Going through the list:
|
Well I figured as long as the pics looks about what I see ingame then it's ok. there are a few that I gave up finding in-game ones because search engines on my computer stop working after the first try.
Then again almost every single picture on the internet is touched up at least a little bit. So with that in mind when I see pictures of games I know they will look much jaggier when I actually play them.
yo_john117 said:
That has to be a bullshot because it looks better than KZ3... |
well, its a cutscene....
but still in the game
these are gameplay, some reason its really hard to find gameplay..
Graphics on the HD consoles have come so far since 2005!
After seeing Resistance: FOM in 2006 I'd never have believed that the following shots could be achieved 100% in-game/real-time running on the same console, truly amazing. (Right click, view image for larger size).
Can't wait to see what Sony Santa Monica's next masterpiece is going to look like...
So much gray, brown and bloom. It's mind-numbing.
Pixel Art can be fun.
SvennoJ said: Screenshots look better yes, what you don't see 2006 Ridge racer 7 1920x1080 flawless 60 fps 20011 Resistance 3 960x704 struggling to keep 30 fps 2006 Dead rising, hundreds of zombies on screen at once 2011 Dead island, 8 enemies on screen |
Why are you comparing Ridge Racer to Resistance? They're two very different games. Also Dead Rising can be compared to Dead Rising 2: Off the Record, which also has hundreds of zombies on screen with superior graphics. That was a pretty horrible attempt at bashing the HD consoles.