Runa216 said:
|
In your opinion, you're not wrong. But, in my opinion, I'm not wrong. Let's just leave it at that. 
Runa216 said:
|
In your opinion, you're not wrong. But, in my opinion, I'm not wrong. Let's just leave it at that. 
Isn't it the opposite???
Square Enix cares waayyy too much about FF7 and are worried about disappointing them. Seriously. Anything FF7 will be under intense scrutiny. Everyone will compare it to memories of the past. Expectations are going to be unrealistic. Who wants that pressure??
For you to demand something from a dev means you're not really a fan. Let them be and let them do what they want. At the very least make your requests in a less forceful manner. Must be hell having fans like you.
FFX isn't a remake. IT's a HD update just like A LOT of these games this gen. It's 10 year anniversary.
Learn some things about VG before posting crap.
FFVII remake would be a massive budget investment. This HD update of FFX is probably being made by about 5 people in a basement.
---

| Lord_Yggdrassil said: FFX isn't a remake. IT's a HD update just like A LOT of these games this gen. It's 10 year anniversary. Learn some things about VG before posting crap. FFVII remake would be a massive budget investment. This HD update of FFX is probably being made by about 5 people in a basement. |
Agreed. besides FF7 has had; Advent Children, Dirge of Cerberus, Crisis Core, Before Crisis, etc. and FF7 has been rereleased on the PSN to monumental sucess. so no i dont think SE have ignored FF7 fans. if anything they have prioritised FF7 fans above others.
FF10 is a rerelease, like FF7, 8 and 9 have been rereleased on the PSN, only it will come with HD support and more likely than not trophies and 3D. their not remaking anything.
besides i've heard Square say that the FF7 compilation will finish on the 20th aniversary of FF7. so i would expect a remkae at that time. not that i want want anyway.
So Final Fantasy X get a HD port and sequel (Final Fantasy X-2). While Final Fantasy VII gets a prequel (Final Fantasy VII Crisis Core), a mobile phone game (Before Crisis), a movie a (Final Fantasy Advent Children), with an extended version of Advent Children, and a third person shooter starting Vincent Valentine ( Final Fantasy VII Dirge of Cerberus). So compare Final Fantasy X to Final Fantasy VII you obvious think Square Enix care more about Final Fantasy X more than Final Fantasy VII. My last point is this Final Fantasy VII remake is getting out of hand because a tech demo release in 2006 to show what the next installment of Final Fantasy would look like on the Playstation 3.
I read the opening post in this thread every now and then just to get a laugh. So many logical fallacies on display here.
My Console Library:
PS5, Switch, XSX
PS4, PS3, PS2, PS1, WiiU, Wii, GCN, N64 SNES, XBO, 360
3DS, DS, GBA, Vita, PSP, Android
why didn't SE realease a collection with X , X-2 and XII. only remasterting ffX seems like a cash in
| jonager said: why didn't SE realease a collection with X , X-2 and XII. only remasterting ffX seems like a cash in |
Wait... I don't detect sarcasm... >_>







Face the future.. Gamecenter ID: nikkom_nl (oh no he didn't!!)
| Lord_Yggdrassil said: FFX isn't a remake. IT's a HD update just like A LOT of these games this gen. It's 10 year anniversary. Learn some things about VG before posting crap. FFVII remake would be a massive budget investment. This HD update of FFX is probably being made by about 5 people in a basement. |
So wait, the only reason you see they couldn't do it is because it would be a massive budget investment? Well then, I guess every company should just stop making new video games all together. I mean the cost to produce them is only going up, that's just too much of a risk. We need to keep to just simple $2 games that last maybe a couple of hours before you grow tired of them.