UncleScrooge said:
PullusPardus said:
kowenicki said:
Mordred11 said:
Slimebeast said: Why would I want to play a PS3 game on a tiny screen and lower image quality? |
Maybe because you could do it anywhere?
|
You think?
I doubt that. On the bus via 3G... no chance.
|
Why not?
|
Because the games are way (way!) too big
3G is what, 7.2mbits/s? Some PS3 game are 50GB in size - there is no chance to stream 50GB. Also, most 3G services are limited to 1GB per month. That's 25 months for a single layer blu-ray.
And you would need at least a 32GB card to dump a single PS3 game onto the Vita. And Sony won't allow that because that would enable easy piracy.
|
The only thing the Vita/PSP does during Remote Play is receive a video stream and send input commands over Wifi. The PS3 does all the rendering and processing of the input commands it receives, then sends the video stream back through the Wifi connection.
The system is pretty identical to the OnLive system; the only issues being latency due to distance (within 50 miles of your PS3 shouldn't be too bad) and latency due to encoding the video stream (on top of rendering the game world and processing input commands).
If you have tested this with the PSP it obviously works but does have some lag; this lag may be less with the vita/PS3 (based on the videos I would say it is drastically better).