By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - CNN: Only 10% Of Gamers Finish Their Games

Depending on the game some choose not to play the full game as well. Alot of gamers now days just buy games simply for the online multiplayer feature while never even considered trying to play the actual campaign. Its reasons like that that EA was (and maybe still in the future) considering of scraping the entire single player modes in their sports game and just make it just online only.

I try to complete my games. Last gen i probably finished like 95% of my collection, where as this gen is more like 65%.



Around the Network

Thats odd......

You'd think buying a $60 game, you'd try to get your moneys worth by finishing the entire game.....people are seriously weird!



Hmm...the last game I completed was Halo:Reach. It's very rare for me to finish the campaign or story of a game. I'm more of a multiplayer online type of gamer. In fact I haven't even touched the campaign for Call of Duty: Black Ops yet. The only game I finished out of the Call of Duty series was World at War.



I'd totally believe it. I've only finished about 33% of my games as of now. The remaining I'm either partially in, or haven't even started yet.

I do intend to finish all of these games, however. My problem is every time I say I won't buy more games until I finish all of mine...wala, I buy more games.



Money can't buy happiness. Just video games, which make me happy.

The achievements in most games can be unbelievably hard or too time consuming for a gamer to complete a game to 100%. Plenty of games get boring within the first one or two hours and they either get returned, sold or gather dust in one's games library.



Around the Network

It depends on how much I like the game, whether I get distracted by some other game and move on to that, etc. Like right now I'm thinking about just youtubing the rest of Catherine (a game that I was anticipating for months) and youtubing the endings (I'm in the middle of Stage 6. There are 9 in the game) because the puzzle game play just isn't all that fun to me and I'd much rather play something else right now. I'm only really interested in the game's interactive story and seeing what happens with the story in each of the different branches you can take. If a game stops being fun for you, I see no reason to continue playing. I used to trudge through games I lost interest in mid-way just to beat them and get them out of my backlog. But that made gaming into more of a chore/job rather than a fun hobby. I'd rather not take that philosophy on gaming anymore.

Plus I find that if you focus too much on beating your games rather than experiencing your games, it can cut time into other hobbies that you enjoy (unless you buy less but play each individual game more intensively. I find that I'm the type that wants to experience more games rather than say focus on 100%-ing a smaller selection of games. If you feel "I want to try that new game, but I have to beat this game first." Ugh. That's a bad thing).

Btw I'm on backloggery and my beat and completion rates are not impressive at all. lol. That's ok though. Gaming should be about fun. 

Lyrikalstylez said:

Thats odd......

You'd think buying a $60 game, you'd try to get your moneys worth by finishing the entire game.....people are seriously weird!

I understand that feeling. I just paid $80 for the Catherine "Love is Over" Deluxe Edition a month ago and I'm struggling to find the motivation to continue the game. It makes me feel like I'm wasteful with money. But why should you go play something that isn't fun for you anymore? That defeats the whole purpose of gaming. The logical solution would be to resell in that case. But since it's a collector's edition, I don't want to resell it unless I really have to because it's going to appreciate in value in the future.

If I youtubed the later stages of the game before buying, I could have saved myself from $80 since from the youtube video it would have been clear that the puzzles are so crazy that they would frustrate me (there are walkthroughs on youtube where you can see what you need to do step-by-step to beat the stages. But when you get to that point that the game itself isn't fun anymore for you and you need a youtube video to hold your hand, why stop there? Why not just watch the rest of the game on youtube when it's clear that I don't like the gameplay? Why not just watch an anime or TV show with a good story than endure a game you don't like with a good story?). But youtubing the later parts of a game would be spoiling the game for you. Ah well. Just be thankful that we still have the ability to resell games.

I am not bashing Catherine for having difficult puzzles (hell i was playing on easy mode. lol.) but I'm not about to pretend that I like this kind of gameplay to earn cred with ATLUS fanboys. I loved Persona but Catherine is not my game. 



Ajescent said:
This I guess is another arguement why games should be shorter, I played Vanquish, didn't like it so I gave up at the end of Act 1. I can't remember the last game I completed to be honest x_x


Hey if a game isn't good enough to finish, that's probably the fault of the game more then it's length.

As for me, shoot.... I think i've got about 20-30 games I haven't even started yet.

Also, i play a lot of sandbox, "can't complete" type games so....



Lostplanet22 said:
Not really surprising, we had an discussion about this a few years ago VGCHART. An discussion that started with Patcher saying only a small group of gamers finish their games. I even have games that I didn't started yet ^^'..


I am in the same boat.  I usually stick to games that go on forever....  Animal Crossing, WaW / BO (last CoD games I will ever buy), Monster Hunter, WoW (gave my account away), etc..  I then don't concentrate on games that are quicker to beat.  I also have too many games (mainly Virtual Console) games that I have barely played or haven't even played.  I am going to make a list of games that I have yet to play or barely and focus on them first before getting sucked into another never ending game.



I actully beleive this. the question is who they surveryed. since a lot of users this gen are Wii gamers who are kids and parents, who you wouldnt expect to finish games anyway.

interestingly i'm sure Sony and Microsoft can use trophy and achievement data to see how many users finished their games.



chocoloco said:
mantlepiecek said:
Troll_Whisperer said:

 

Lee's company, Raptr, is an online service that tracks players' online play sessions and achievements. According to Raptr's internal data, only 10 percent of people who played Rockstar's epic Red Dead Redemption (shown above) completed the final mission.

There's a different reason for this lol.. I am not going to say it though, people who have played red dead redemption will understand what I am saying.

Can't say I do understand.

OT: On this site it is probably because people spend so much time speculating on game sales. Also, games like red dead are really long. I think a more in depth study would be interesting to see what types of games are most likely to be finished.


The ending is a little hard to reach in red dead redemption, that's all I can say without spoilers. Its a little complicated to realize where the ending is.