Doobie_wop said:
I never even mentioned Miyamoto, but I will now. Pretty much every game Miyamoto made was using ideas that were already put into games, he may have have come up with some finer details, but the overall design and structure of his games were old news by the time they released. Zelda wasn't the first open world game, it wasn't even the 8th, but it did do it very well and popularized it. It's like how Nintendo didn't introduce touch screen gaming, but they did make it popular. Yu Suzuki actually created whole new ways to play games, he did stuff that no one had ever done before and he basically conquered the Arcades during the late 80's and 90's, people seem to forget that. Regarding the triggers, did Miyamoto actually invent them? It's not that I don't believe you and it was definently a significant creation, but I wasn't under the impression that he was a hardware designer at the time. You have to remember that we aren't talking about SEGA vs Nintendo, we are talking about Miyamoto vs Yu Suzuki. I'm not saying Miyamoto hasn't done alot for gaming, I'm just saying Yu Suzuki has been far more influential when it comes to how games of today are actually built and designed. |
I'm sure about the triggers, I heard it multiple times and surfing the web I can't find otherwise: probably he didn't literally create them, but he was the one who commissioned them. Anyway I thought you weren't mentioning Miyamoto because he was like too much inferior to the other guy, and I don't think he is, but I understand your reasons to vote Suzuki. As I said, too bad we've to eliminate one of them, this should be like the final, people like Pachter won...I guess that's the game.










