By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - Is This How MS Intends To Become #1?

I think it's because Brazil must be another US state soon. Wasn't there a thread about the 51st state coming soon? I guess it's Brazil.

Why not, it would help stabilize Brazil's inflation and the country is doing well with bio fuel.

(just kidding!)



 

Really not sure I see any point of Consol over PC's since Kinect, Wii and other alternative ways to play have been abandoned. 

Top 50 'most fun' game list coming soon!

 

Tell me a funny joke!

Around the Network
thismeintiel said:

"Michael Pachter did tell me in email however that much of the X360 year over year rise came from a) free X360s given away with Windows 7, and b) X360s sold directly to distributors (some of these units apparently ended up in Brazil) - "and Microsoft convinced NPD to count both". Pachter didn't have figures on how many units those promotions added, but estimates that X360 would have dropped slightly year over year (-5% to -10%) without those inclusions."

 


By convinced They mean money was involved

And if this is true, then i have lost all my respect for NPD as they should be counting numbers of systems sold to distributors for the PS3 and Wii as well.  :)

 



Troll_Whisperer said:
thismeintiel said:

Of course, like I mention in the title, this may also be how MS plans to achieve its stated goal of being #1 this year.

If I understand this correctly (and if I don't someone correct me), they can't do that since they're basically selling the consoles to themselves. The consoles they sold to retailers in Brazil are consoles they will not need to ship again to Brazil, so the number stays the same. They inflate US numbers in exchange for deflating LA numbers (but those are not kown usually). Shipped consoles should tell us the truth in the end.

Well, yes, overall shipped should stay the same.  That's not really what I'm arguing, though.  The point is, if Pachter is correct, than MS has gotten NPD to count some shipments to distributors as sold to customers in the US.  And as he said, some even made their way into another country, so those definitely shouldn't have been counted as sales in the US at all.  Really, I don't care what MS wants to do to shift its shipment numbers to make it look like its doing better in the US, in the end the overall shipment numbers would still remain the same.  My real problem comes from a supposed unbiased 3rd party (NPD) being "convinced" to go along with MS on this.  If they are doing it for MS, then why not start doing it for Sony and Nintendo?  Not only would it now be fair, it would also make them appear to be doing much better in the US, as well.

Also, why are some of you focusing on the promotion?  I already stated that wasn't the issue, and that those consoles given away should be included.



theprof00 said:
sales2099 said:
theprof00 said:
sales2099 said:
lol first off its one month out of dozens of months that passed this gen. relax

its also mostly due to the 360 windows 7 promotion.

and it all works out due to if these are inflated due to being shipped then next month will be lower as its all about trying to actually sell those shipped

but how many since inception has ms been counting? How many have they "given away" outside of the windows 7 promo, and what else is counted?

Also, where do the 360 replacements come from? The distributors?

I'm very curious as to their numbers when it appears currently that ps3 sells many more games.

ps3 sells more games? when there isnt any fresh releases the 360 usually comes out on top software wise.....as it has done the entire gen mostly. 

its also not like ms is the only one giving away consoles. Sony has a free ps3 given to any rogers customer that buys 2 phones. They all do it. Some promos are just more successful then the other. 

Sorry, I mean attach rate. 360 sells more games, but ps3 sometimes beats it. At one point, I think it was 4 months of straight higher sales, but with significantly less hardware. The attach rate for ps3 is higher every year IIRC, and that doesn't make sense to me.

I could be completely wrong, since I've been out of the sales loop for a while, but I was pretty sure that ps3 was now beating 360 in overall attach rate, and beating it also for 2 straight years.

And I'm not saying MS is wrong for doing it. They all do it, believe me, I know. But MS is the better marketer. Your alluded offer is good at rogers, a retailer which I've never heard of. MS' offer is with any windows 7 700$ pc no matter what retailer in all of usa. I'm pretty sure that MS is "selling" a whole lot more than nintendo or sony. That's what I'm trying to get at. What's the discrepancy?

Rogers isnt established in the states? Im in canada and its the leading Cell phone/internet provider. 



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

Do you still believe what Pachter says? He's nothing more than a really successful troll.



Around the Network

They're trying to take over the world!



           

How is that any different than me buying, say, 40 360's and exporting them to some other country and sell it at a premium for personal gain?? Doesn't this type of thing happen for any device?

In fact, it is very well documented that personal businesses and people alike were buying truck loads of iPads and shippinp them overseas and making a killing. Making it almost impossible for a legitimate consumer to find one. No ONE held that against Apple when sales figures were released.

And like someone else said, everybody hates Pachter and call him names but when he says something more to their liking he is the man and the ultimate of reliable sources. Sheesh.



slowmo said:
Using Patcher as a basis of your argument = OP losing credibility...


..not even patcher.  patcher as interpreted via theSource which makes it even worse.  i'm with kowen, the whole OP is garbage, shipment numbers which release very soon here is the one number to care about.



Let me get the gist of this argument. Tracking sales of cross promotion bundled systems is wrong, and distributors are not considered to be consumers. Excuse me while I laugh my ass off. This isn't new this has always been the way things have been. At least for this generation. Every manufacturer sells to distributors, because distributors allow for truly global sales of their products. No company tracks beyond the place of sale, because they have no obligation beyond the point of sale. The market where the sale takes place is where the sale is going to be reported. Every manufacturer will account in this fashion.

Ironically sales to distributors do not fundamentally function differently from local sales, because the distributor that buys systems to sell in small markets is also going to buy software for export to those markets. So even if a console is in say Argentina the purchases that accompany that console will still be made in the market of origin. So you really should think of those consoles as still being in the region where they were purchased.

On to the matter of cross bundled hardware. Really Microsoft doing this is detestable. What of Sony and all of the cross promotion sales they did with movies and television sets. I am sorry, but as far as this goes this generation. The worst culprit is Sony. Microsoft would come next, and then you would get Nintendo. Well for the obvious reason that they have nothing to cross promote with. So just about every console sale by Nintendo in the current generation was stand alone.

Anyway why would anyone think that Sony and Nintendo aren't counting distributor sales. They obviously must be doing exactly that. Otherwise their shipped/sold numbers would have a much larger margin. Perhaps five to even six million units by this point in a generation if distributor sales weren't being counted. The only truly interesting thing in this thread is a distributor sale by Microsoft was worthy of note. I am kind of curious as to which player is actually dominating in the South America region. This may become more important over time.



kowenicki said:
kitler53 said:
slowmo said:
Using Patcher as a basis of your argument = OP losing credibility...


..not even patcher.  patcher as interpreted via theSource which makes it even worse.  i'm with kowen, the whole OP is garbage, shipment numbers which release very soon here is the one number to care about.


Slight misinterpretation by the source... but that use of the word "persuade" is enough to generate mis-trust and accusations of cash changing hands here in the forums, which is of course utter bollocks.

The truth according to Pachter (yes, I asked him) is that if a manufacturer can "demonstrate" that the number are off then NPD will look again.  Now, put across that way it feels different and probably means that this is not an unusual event and has likely  happened before from many maufacturers, be they phone, tablet, gaming or software companies.  But presumably the case has to be sound and certainly will not be based on some obsucre evidence or cash changing hands.  People see what they want to see and frankly its weak.

he actually answers emails?