Oh my.  I remember saying something about why not consider The Conduit as just a good FPS for the Wii, rather than something that is supposed to be a high def one, and I got flagged and received a warning from a Mod on here, because that was seen as offensive.  Maybe I expressed a STFU tone in my writing, with a dash of contempt for the person bringing that up.  If so, it was from people making a game out to be a game changer, more than just a good game.

Seems like people can't just let a game be a game people enjoy.  Games get turned into ammo in the console wars, and this annoys me and will sometimes cloud my own opinion of things, seeing things that are there that really aren't.

Hang on a sec.  What makes NMH better than Boom Blox?

I though it was a good game, but that's it... The gameplay was kind of funny, but killing nonstop is not my idea of playing videogames... I skip most FPS for the same reason...

Well, that doesn't answer the question, because a number of people would say Boom Blox is betetr because it is not NMH.

Madworld was very hyped, so most people thought it was a AAA game. With that said I think it was a great game with a huge flaw, replay value as it is a 4 hour game. Other than that it had a great art style, story was decent but the gameplay was also great, especially for a beat them up. With that said anyone that says that No More Heroes sucked is wrong plain and simple. I can understand that you didnt liked it, but saying the game is bad is far from being accurate.

I think both games were pretty interesting, visually they both looked nice, with the cel shading which is pretty rare, i liked MadWorlds black and white. Story was ok, but where both games failed hard was the core game play, which just totally sucked. The most repetitive pieces of crap i've ever played. No More Heroes was about spamming A and B and MadWorld was about spamming A, over and over and over again, with the occasional B thrown in.

Hardly any AAA games, quality wise and sales wise.

"In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king."

With the amount of released core Wii titles everything for gamers was automatically considered AAA game

That is not true and I think it is a good game. To play from start to finish, its good but not great. The only thing about the game that I wish was better was the controls. It might of been better if they made it with a joystick than with the Wii-mote controls.

This game was a boring 6 hour (or less) game. I didn't feel like finishing it knowing how the rank of fighters would skip by the hundreds. The fighting system was fun for some time, but got boring really fast. The bosses were boring too =_=.

I think it is a fun beat'em up. I don't know how else to answer the question. I think the question in the title might be a sign that we are in some kind of dark age of video games.

But I'm not receiving munies from any game companies, so my opinion doesn't really matter.