tao said: The PS3 is in the exact same situation as the PS2 and PSone were before. So I don't really understand why everyone is so negative about the sales of a 600$ console. Only the early adaptors will buy it and after the pricedrop lots of people will follow. It worked 7 years and 12 years ago and will work just the same way with the PS3 once the pricedrop in October comes. That is not what happened to the PS1 and PS2. They sold well from the beginning; the PS1 sold very well for a first system, and the PS2 set sales records. And the PS1 and PS2 sold at half the price of the PS3. If you think that's the exact same situation, you are delusional as the Nintendo fanboys denying the lackluster sales of the GC. Most people on here want to see Sony fail, that's why they're so happy about the low sales compared to the Wii and keep bitching about it. But you can't compare a 600$ console to a 250$ one. The PS3 will have a way longer lifespan than the Wii and will definately outsell it in time. You can compare a $250 one to a $300 one, which is how the PS1 and PS2 cost. Sorry, but consumers are not overlooking that, especially since the PS2 offered the DVD player at that price. Nothing in live is for certain, so the PS3 could ofcourse fail miserably. But nothing points to that direction right now. The first real indication we'll have will be during Christmas. If the PS3 outsells its competitors during that period, the PS3 will probably be the new market leader. If not then the PS3 probably won't. That is one thing I agree on, as past console wars have been decided largely around that time. If the PS3's games sell, consumers will buy the system, even if the price will slow adoption as fast at the past Playstations. |
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs