I think just about every post here should be responded with "Chill out, it's a videogame." Most of Shams original post complains about things that are "unrealistic." Rocks are too shiny. Nathan takes too many hits. He doesn't get hurt by grenades that are right behind the wall. Nathan shouldn't be able to heal by himself. Nathan kills too many people.

Shams, you've clearly missed the point of the game. Have read anything about it? Actually, forget about reading about it. Have you seen any movie ever? Such as a classic trilogy like Indiana Jones? When has anything any of those movies made sense. Clearly, you just don't get it. Move on and continue to not have fun playing very good games.

Ive been banned 11 times.

 Awesome post.

No, it's not that I couldn't handle your "impressions" just that impressions mean you've actually played the game, not seen it in action.  So now we don't have to play the game before we can review it?  You clearly said the game would only get a 7-8 which is a review score.  So I've never played SMG, I saw it played in GS for thirty minutes and I give it a seven.  That is and would be wrong.  You have to play a game, somewhat extensively before you start handing out scores. 

 @ elnino

 Yes he is entitled to his opinion, but when he gives is opinion along with a score, that's when it's wrong, especially, when you haven't played the game.  I just don't understand reviewing a game you've seen for thirty minutes and haven't played.

 im sorry but I actually know how to write....

http://www.psu.com/Go-Sudoku-Review-Review--a232-p0.php

http://www.psu.com/Armored-Core-4-Review-Review--a229-p0.php

so mine will not be a copy and paste jobs. 

I realize that you have ever right to be very critcal, but I dont think a score was nescessaey for impressions.

I loved it, and I reccommend you give the game another shot at the start.

P.S. Call of Duty has the same auto heal system. I guess it's a love/hate thing.

@ssj12

How did you get to do that?

 I worked for PSU...