Not really. It fits perfectly. Why would someone who is not a paedo have pics of underage children in sexual situaitions on their PC.

IF you're sexually attracted to those lolis, and use that game and those images for sexual satisfaction then you are a paedo. The question is: Is the purpose of that game to create sexual arousal?

Nah, hardly.

However, you should show more distinction.

Lolicon =/= child porn

Slippery slope man

That's not how it works though. That's what the thought police laws want people to believe, but Japan, the country in which this material originates and sells frequently and popularly, has a far lower rate of child molestation than any western country, including the US, where people are prosecuted for fantasizing about such material. I agree, it's a mental depravity, and those people should probably seek optional counseling, but there is no evidennce to show that people who view lolicon material are any more likelly to rape or molest children than those who don't.

Damn, this topic reminds me of a cross between 1984 and Lolita. I'm sure most of you have read 1984, but read Lolita one of these days. It's all kind of fuckedupness.

I wonder if the reason why that is, is because such cases are less likely to be reported in Japan. Having sex with children, especially young boys, was quite common in feudal Japan. I'm quite sure that people who view material involving young children in sexual situations are more likely to be a paedophile than those who don't. And sicne paedophilia is a mental illness, and paedophiles are a danger to society, therapy should be mandatory.

And in the same time the Japanese thought it was acceptable to have sex with young boys, the Europeans had no such thing as laws against rape nor child molestation, and the average age of marriage was 11.

The Japanese have some of the most efficient and effective law enforcement in the world, and very very few crimes go unreported. Part of this is it's a country where people are crammed so close together that you alway sknow what everyone else is doing. It's great that you're so sure of your misguided beliefs that you're willing to deny overwhelming statistical data (less than 1% of child molestations in the world are comitted by Asians and Pacific Islanders, while more than 50% are comitted by white people in countries in which we have such laws). What? There are 4 times as many Asians as Whites in the world too? Oh so White people in countries with laws against lolicon material are actually about 200 times more likely to commit the crime? Well, I'm sure it's just the police thing. Keep telling yourself that. 

Don't you watch South Park? The definition of "faggot" or "fag" has now been changed and it doens't insult homosexuals =D.

And this is pathetic, if this "law" applies to the UK as well then I will be arrested for CREATING child pornography after they see some of the shit that I draw during lunch break.

But the thing is that these laws exist as a response to child abuse. You're trying to suggest that they're the cause, which is quite silly. If what you're saying is true about those statistics, it only shows that asians are less likely than whites to abuse children. Relaxing laws for child abusers would essentially doom children in Western countries.

Regarding your first paragraph, children were actually molested at that time in Europe. Are you suggesting otherwise?