By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - Americans would save 93 million per year if salaries of congress were eliminated. (last time)

Doesn't sound like that much money to me - I'm sure you'd make much more in savings if you cut 20% off the welfare budget.



Click this button, you know you want to!  [Subscribe]

Watch me on YouTube!

http://www.youtube.com/user/TheRadishBros

~~~~ Mario Kart 8 drove far past my expectations! Never again will I doubt the wheels of a Monster Franchise! :0 ~~~~

Around the Network

Congressmen/women and Senators should be limited to two terms I'm tired of these bad/corrupt politicians always get reelected put some new blood into politics. That would solve some of issues with the government.



Anyone who's breaking the law is obvious a criminal.

Allfreedom99 said:
Vetteman94 said:

Exactly,  its sad.   Luckily I have insurance,  but for one emergency room visit for me about 3 years ago it was $6k  and I left 4 hours after I got there.  

Sethnintendo, you are right that our health system needs changes. It does need reform. One of the problems in our healthcare system is the amount of tests a hospital has to go through to tell you something the doctor already has probably known. There are so many unnecessary tests that often take place. The problem is all the doctor has to do is breathe on you wrong and the hospital gets sued now days. They do so many tests to cover their butts. Our system can be over thorough many times.

Also @ Vetteman94.  You want the European style health care in America? Why is it that many of the rich in other countries end up coming to the States for their health care? Because its is arguably the best care in the world. You were also talking about how our country can't cut anything from the government programs, because it would hurt the poor people. The problem our nation is facing is with so much money being dumped into medicare, medicade, social security, ect that they are becoming unsustainable. We are becoming more and more a welfare state with an entitlement mentality. how did this nation become so great and prosperous?

1. through the freedom a man/woman has to go out and put his hand to the plow. the freedom a man/woman has to create a product and sell it at a profit. The freedom a man/woman has to buy and invest his money into whatever he wants.

 2. Through hard work and perseverance. The drive to not give up on the pursuit of prosperity and happiness. Through being individually responsible for oneself in providing for his/her needs and their family. The early settlers understood this.

3. It was through charitability in helping your fellow man in hard times to achieve the same goals so that we can prosper as one nation that stands for liberty and freedom. Its the freedom we have to make our own choices without a government telling us what we can and cannot do as individuals.

I think our country has lost some of these view points and has begun to rely more on what our government can provide for us. Its a shame to see so many people out of work. To see so many people on food stamps and on unemployment benefits. What are some of the nations of the world coming to when there are riots in the streets, because a government tries to handle some of its debt by making its people provide a little bit more for themselves? I ask why have we become so reliant on these government programs and then say we want government to provide even more for us? This is a shame. I understand there are those people out there that absolutely have no ability to work and are disabled. Those are the people who need the helping hand, and not the man that has capable hands and feet with a good back that can work and earn an income, but instead sits on his fanny collecting money from the government while his neighbor is working very hard and sees some of his money get distributed to the lazy man.

I see plenty of unemployed that would rather sit at home than honestly seek a job, because the government will pay for their needs. Grant it there are fewer jobs today, but I argue its because of increased regulation and government control rather than greedy corporations not wanting to hire workers. The American entrepreneur's spirit continues to be extinguished as the government promises to provide more and more for its people. Why should one work if he can get paid to do nothing?

I know something is wrong when people ask the government to provide more for them. Yes life is expensive. It requires hard work and dedication to have success. I am sorry if I offend, but I had to respond.

The US is ranked like 30th in the world for health care,  so to argue its one of the best would be a wrong arguement.  The only thing i have seen rich people from other countries come here for is plastic surgery and what few normal physicians they go to for normal things,  everyday people cant go to them due to how expensive they are so why bring them up. Social Security is a self sustaining program,  and its currently sitting at a surplus. And with one small change to the Social Security system, raising the tax ceiling, it will take care of any issue that would arise in the future.  But thats been tried and blocked by the Republicans. And Medicare could cost less if we used its size and number of participants to bargain with the drug companies for lower prices,  but that keeps getting blocked by Republicans because it hurts the drug companies.  Not to mention Medicare is going to start becoming cheaper over the next few years due to ObamaCare,  as it saved a significant amount of money.

There are no jobs to be had in this nation.  Corporations are outsourcing work more and more since it is cheaper and gives them higher profits. Not to mention some are even moving their facilities out of the country cause its cheaper to ship And all the labor jobs are going to illegal immigrants due to low cost to pay them/  The unions are getting busted up and their bargaining rights taken away so whats left of the middle class basically cant fight back against these Coprorations.  But what is this increased regulation and control the government has over these corporations you claim?  Not getting enough H1B Visas for overseas help?   Not getting enough subsidies from the government?  Tax rates not low enough?

And I see plenty of people who are willing to work but cant due to no jobs being available.

And I think there is something wrong with the people in this country when people think its ok for the poor to suffer and the rich prosper and the dividing line between the 2 increases at an exponetial rate.  When they worry about the richest 1% getting more of their money and corporations not have to pay taxes, but to make that happen the poor have to do without and the elderly die from no health care.    But hey its ok,  the rich really need that money more right.



CaptainObvious said:
Congressmen/women and Senators should be limited to two terms I'm tired of these bad/corrupt politicians always get reelected put some new blood into politics. That would solve some of issues with the government.

Then you face the cool feature of the lobbyists offering them jobs after they get out, in exchange for favors.  The new blood would keep ending up on the lobbying dole.  The answers are not all that simple.  People who want power, find ways to rig the system to their advantage.



Vetteman94 said:

The US is ranked like 30th in the world for health care,  so to argue its one of the best would be a wrong arguement.  The only thing i have seen rich people from other countries come here for is plastic surgery and what few normal physicians they go to for normal things,  everyday people cant go to them due to how expensive they are so why bring them up.

 

Social Security is a self sustaining program,  and its currently sitting at a surplus.

No. It's not self-sustaining. It was in the red for the first time ever in 2010, and is likely to never see a surplus ever again. This is due to the faulty way the program was built and sustained for a long time. In the 1950's, there were 8.6 workers per beneficiary. Today, its 3.2 and dropping. This will have a significant impact on the system, and eventually destroy it.

And with one small change to the Social Security system, raising the tax ceiling, it will take care of any issue that would arise in the future.

But why would you want to tax more people through such a broken, horrible system as Social Security? The reason more people would need to be taxes is that........It doesn't work! If SS was self-sustaining (as you said), then why would anything need to change?

 But thats been tried and blocked by the Republicans. And Medicare could cost less if we used its size and number of participants to bargain with the drug companies for lower prices,  but that keeps getting blocked by Republicans because it hurts the drug companies.  Not to mention Medicare is going to start becoming cheaper over the next few years due to ObamaCare,  as it saved a significant amount of money.

The CBO has heavily re-adjusted the Obamacare savings estimates. Instead of saving money, it is likely to cause massive deficits over the next decade.

There are no jobs to be had in this nation.  Corporations are outsourcing work more and more since it is cheaper and gives them higher profits. Not to mention some are even moving their facilities out of the country cause its cheaper to ship And all the labor jobs are going to illegal immigrants due to low cost to pay them/  The unions are getting busted up and their bargaining rights taken away so whats left of the middle class basically cant fight back against these Coprorations.  But what is this increased regulation and control the government has over these corporations you claim?  Not getting enough H1B Visas for overseas help?   Not getting enough subsidies from the government?  Tax rates not low enough?

What unions are getting busted up? The only ones that are getting broken are public ones that should never have existed in the first place. Outside of that, most companies would rather do business in right-to-work states that don't have heavy, job-killing unions in them which is why states like Texas are booming.

The government has a lot of increased control over corporations, but it usually results in some corps getting favored, while killing smaller businesses. That is why the government needs LESS regulation, not MORE to favor certain industries or companies. We need lower taxes, no subsidies, and no credits.

And I think there is something wrong with the people in this country when people think its ok for the poor to suffer and the rich prosper and the dividing line between the 2 increases at an exponetial rate.  When they worry about the richest 1% getting more of their money and corporations not have to pay taxes, but to make that happen the poor have to do without and the elderly die from no health care.    But hey its ok,  the rich really need that money more right.

We've had 40+ years of welfare in this country - trillions have been spent to get the poor out of poverty. Why is it worse than ever? Surely if welfare was to help the poor, would it not have fixed things by now? The problem has nothing with the rich getting richer, it more has to do with how the poor work and operate vs. how the rich operate. In my own life, I see so many people staying poor not because of other people, but because their education is horrible, and they have no drive to improve their life.





Back from the dead, I'm afraid.

Around the Network
mrstickball said:
Vetteman94 said:

The US is ranked like 30th in the world for health care,  so to argue its one of the best would be a wrong arguement.  The only thing i have seen rich people from other countries come here for is plastic surgery and what few normal physicians they go to for normal things,  everyday people cant go to them due to how expensive they are so why bring them up.

 

Social Security is a self sustaining program,  and its currently sitting at a surplus.

No. It's not self-sustaining. It was in the red for the first time ever in 2010, and is likely to never see a surplus ever again. This is due to the faulty way the program was built and sustained for a long time. In the 1950's, there were 8.6 workers per beneficiary. Today, its 3.2 and dropping. This will have a significant impact on the system, and eventually destroy it.

And with one small change to the Social Security system, raising the tax ceiling, it will take care of any issue that would arise in the future.

But why would you want to tax more people through such a broken, horrible system as Social Security? The reason more people would need to be taxes is that........It doesn't work! If SS was self-sustaining (as you said), then why would anything need to change?

 But thats been tried and blocked by the Republicans. And Medicare could cost less if we used its size and number of participants to bargain with the drug companies for lower prices,  but that keeps getting blocked by Republicans because it hurts the drug companies.  Not to mention Medicare is going to start becoming cheaper over the next few years due to ObamaCare,  as it saved a significant amount of money.

The CBO has heavily re-adjusted the Obamacare savings estimates. Instead of saving money, it is likely to cause massive deficits over the next decade.

There are no jobs to be had in this nation.  Corporations are outsourcing work more and more since it is cheaper and gives them higher profits. Not to mention some are even moving their facilities out of the country cause its cheaper to ship And all the labor jobs are going to illegal immigrants due to low cost to pay them/  The unions are getting busted up and their bargaining rights taken away so whats left of the middle class basically cant fight back against these Coprorations.  But what is this increased regulation and control the government has over these corporations you claim?  Not getting enough H1B Visas for overseas help?   Not getting enough subsidies from the government?  Tax rates not low enough?

What unions are getting busted up? The only ones that are getting broken are public ones that should never have existed in the first place. Outside of that, most companies would rather do business in right-to-work states that don't have heavy, job-killing unions in them which is why states like Texas are booming.

The government has a lot of increased control over corporations, but it usually results in some corps getting favored, while killing smaller businesses. That is why the government needs LESS regulation, not MORE to favor certain industries or companies. We need lower taxes, no subsidies, and no credits.

And I think there is something wrong with the people in this country when people think its ok for the poor to suffer and the rich prosper and the dividing line between the 2 increases at an exponetial rate.  When they worry about the richest 1% getting more of their money and corporations not have to pay taxes, but to make that happen the poor have to do without and the elderly die from no health care.    But hey its ok,  the rich really need that money more right.

We've had 40+ years of welfare in this country - trillions have been spent to get the poor out of poverty. Why is it worse than ever? Surely if welfare was to help the poor, would it not have fixed things by now? The problem has nothing with the rich getting richer, it more has to do with how the poor work and operate vs. how the rich operate. In my own life, I see so many people staying poor not because of other people, but because their education is horrible, and they have no drive to improve their life.

 

There was a 68.6B net in 2010,  it was only speculated that it would go into the red due to an increase in retirings,  but that never happened.  And the increase i am refering to wouldnt increase taxes for everyone, the current taxable shelf for SS is 90k,  which means anyone who makes 90k or more pays the same amount. And in all cases the increase would be minute as SS doesnt make up a huge percentage of taxes anyway. Raising that would eliminate any possible issue that is in the forseeable future.  One being when the Baby boomers retire.  So yes it is still self sustaining.

I never said Obamacare was perfect,  I was only refering to what it did for Medicare.  But what you are refering to can easily be fixed.  Its still a far better plan than Ryan's idea thats for sure.

But thats exactly what I am talking about, moving to states without a heavy union presense kills them in others.  Plus what union has ever killed jobs?  Thats a ridiculous concept.  Is it because a corporation doesnt feel that a blue collar worker should get his fair share?

And taking away regulation would do the same thing to smaller companies.  They would be crushed under the power of the larger corporations who have less regulations on how they do business.  They would never be able to compete with them.  

Well we have had 10 years of lower taxes and we are still in an economic downturn,  tax revenue is at its lowest in 50 years and the deficit is sky rocketing.  Maybe we should raise taxes since thats not working.  Since the tax cuts really didnt help me much and in fact I probably pay more now than I did before.   Probably because Im not in those top brackets yet though.  So yes some of it does have to do with the rich getting richer.  But I agree education is poor in this country,  but whats going to fix that?  Cutting taxes so public schools get worse due to less funding? Privitise it so only people who can afford it can send their kids to school?  Dont both of those situations just help the bad situation that its in currently get worse? 



Vetteman94 said:

There was a 68.6B net in 2010,  it was only speculated that it would go into the red due to an increase in retirings,  but that never happened.  And the increase i am refering to wouldnt increase taxes for everyone, the current taxable shelf for SS is 90k,  which means anyone who makes 90k or more pays the same amount. And in all cases the increase would be minute as SS doesnt make up a huge percentage of taxes anyway. Raising that would eliminate any possible issue that is in the forseeable future.  One being when the Baby boomers retire.  So yes it is still self sustaining.

I never said Obamacare was perfect,  I was only refering to what it did for Medicare.  But what you are refering to can easily be fixed.  Its still a far better plan than Ryan's idea thats for sure.

But thats exactly what I am talking about, moving to states without a heavy union presense kills them in others.  Plus what union has ever killed jobs?  Thats a ridiculous concept.  Is it because a corporation doesnt feel that a blue collar worker should get his fair share?

And taking away regulation would do the same thing to smaller companies.  They would be crushed under the power of the larger corporations who have less regulations on how they do business.  They would never be able to compete with them.  

Well we have had 10 years of lower taxes and we are still in an economic downturn,  tax revenue is at its lowest in 50 years and the deficit is sky rocketing.  Maybe we should raise taxes since thats not working.  Since the tax cuts really didnt help me much and in fact I probably pay more now than I did before.   Probably because Im not in those top brackets yet though.  So yes some of it does have to do with the rich getting richer.  But I agree education is poor in this country,  but whats going to fix that?  Cutting taxes so public schools get worse due to less funding? Privitise it so only people who can afford it can send their kids to school?  Dont both of those situations just help the bad situation that its in currently get worse? 

Even if SS is still sustainable, do you know how poor the interest is on the monies paid in? 2.32% APY. That is barely enough for any retiree to live off of (and I am sure both you and I have family that live off of their paltry pensions which are certainly not enough to live off of). And again, you want to fix the problem by raising taxes. Isn't a 12.4% tax on income enough? How much more wealth do you want to destroy in a system that litterally takes the monies, invests in government debt, then taxes the populace again to pay the interest.

If Obamacare needed 'fixed' to be perfect, then why wasn't such legislation included in the 2,000 page bill that was approved? What about the fact that so many companies are requesting exemption from the bill? Methinks if it was remotely good, you wouldn't have thousands of businesses backing out of it.

What union has killed jobs? The ones that request too much wages and compensation that the business becomes uncompetitive to other businesses in the field. GM and Chrysler would be good examples. Where do you work at? I am curious what part of the employment chain you are in to make such kind of general statements that all unions are inherantly good and only provide value to the business. Certainly, not all unions are bad, but if they were 100% beneficial, you wouldn't see almost every corporation fleeing big union states in order to control costs and remain competitive.

Less regulations wouldn't hurt small companies. Are you registered with the NFIB? Do you know how they vote? The largest block of small business owners are always in favor of less regulations to ensure that big companies cannot explot massive government interventions to their favor (which happens very often with our activist government).

Your assumption about education is far off base. You argue that more money is the inherant fixer of problems, yet all data proves that to be wrong. Go look at educational statistics in America - the states with the best test scores are the ones that spend less, not more. The best way to fix education is to provide real competition through school vouchers - a school should not hold a monopoly on education just because of its location. That is an insane concept that is somehow accepted, which has destroyed many kids' educations, as schools have no incentive to improve. If parents and children were given the power to take their education where they wish, you would find that education would cost less, and scores would drasticly improve.



Back from the dead, I'm afraid.

The point of wages for elected officials is so that somebody who is not wealthy can theoretically be elected.



mrstickball said:
According to some congresswomen, they absolutely need that $170,000/yr salary to survive.


are they responsible for paying their own staff? do they have things like residences provided in washington or must they get their own?  when they travel or have meals that are business related are they covered by a seperate fund?



"I like my steaks how i like my women.  Bloody and all over my face"

"Its like sex, but with a winner!"

MrBubbles Review Threads: Bill Gates, Jak II, Kingdom Hearts II, The Strangers, Sly 2, Crackdown, Zohan, Quarantine, Klungo Sssavesss Teh World, MS@E3'08, WATCHMEN(movie), Shadow of the Colossus, The Saboteur

Well I heard the tolls in America are pretty annoying. But I'm from Canada, Ontario and the real problem we have in Toronto and all of Ontario is tax. HST is like 13%. And if you have a job like almost 50% of your income goes to the government!