Onimusha12 said:
Gameplay no better than any of the last generations with an analog stick. I Hope those graphics simply just "existing" is more than enough to compensate for the fact that they've handicapped the HD consoles in more ways than one. By your logic, if better graphics exist, and they do, and that's more than enough reason to demand them as the standard, why not just get a top of the line PC with even better gameplay (mouse & keyboard)? What? Too expensive you say? Well I guess you finally realized the dillemma with exceedingly expensive products vs more economic and appealing competitors. Was one more generation really too much to wait for you to have those graphics? Did you really have to have them now at the cost of losing the lead to Nintendo? Was it worth alienating "Hardcore" genres even more? Well I guess we can find a positive in anything though. While Nintendo is comfortably making an astronomical profit this generation with economic graphics they'll be more than ready next gen to take advantage of all the money Sony and Microsoft lost this generation inbuilding up the Industry's development standards and infrastructure to this unrealistic standard of graphics they've touted, which by next gen will be more than economic if by no other means than the fact that Sony and MS made it so at their own expense and loss this generation. |
As you say, I can't afford an expensive top of line computer because it is extremely expensive, more than three times that of a console, and I don't like mouse and keyboard gameplay, since I have always been a console gamer. I like godd graphics, I feel more immersed if there are good graphics, and so enjoy the game more, and ulltimately that is what gaming is about.
You seem to be suggesting that Sony and Microsoft will never make any money. Of course they are loosing money, because they went down a different line to Nintendo, are more expensive one, that in my opinion, will ultimately yield better results for the gamer, even if Wii is still first in terms of sales. As far as I know, the PS2 was initially sold at a loss, and look how much it has made for sony now, of course they were first in the race at that time. So Sony will make some money. Many people have said that sony will fail and loose this generation. However, we have seen how they have begun to turn things around using their one advantage over nintendo. they are part of an electronics company that is involved in many things, and thus has a very large number of income sources. This means that they can afford these short term losses, in order that they can yield long term profits. the price drop, although it means that Sony loose more money, shifts PS3s, which shifts more software and blu-rays, earning more money for Sony. At the same time it shows that the PS3 can sell well and that Sony are prepared to make sacrifices for it to do well, it encourages third parties to develop for PS3. Well of course you will say that they will develop for the wii, but they have already invested in the tech which they want to use this generation not next generation, so they will look to the PS360. Also some games do sell well on the HD consoles, although Wii software is selling better.
Anyway, the fact that the Wii is leading now does not mean it will lead for ever, it also does not mean that Nintendo will win the next generation.