Why do you guys say 6 is good?
Here's the summary of the review:
The game's second half descends into a fiasco...One thing's for certain: if there's a great action game in Infamous 2, no one's actually built it yet.
It looks to me like a 6 isn't good.
Because their "6" is apparently considered good. Can anyone confirm?
I will use lets say IGN or lets say Gamespot. They have 10 point system were generally 7.5 is considered the average point. This is generally the norm in gaming.
While Edge uses 5 as the average point similar to movie reviewers or book reviewers.
So if you were to do it aligned 5=7.5, 6=8.0, 7=8.5, 8=9, 9=9.5, 10=10.
Given people should always see the content, not the score.
No argument there.
That argument implies: 1 = 5.5, 2 = 6, 3 = 6.5, 4 = 7, 5=7.5, 6=8.0, 7=8.5, 8=9, 9=9.5, 10=10.
Now that doesn't make much sense does it. I think they have an agenda and I think the score they gave is totally unfair. Don't get me wrong, I didn't even like the first inFamous, but this game has quality stamped all over it.
i wish someone would hack them and change the score to 8 or 9/10. That would be the right way of using one's hacking abilities.