I'm intregued about where this passion comes from.

Anywho, all your point there was good. At the current world's population any kind of population control is surely good, even if this is a weird version but the choice for LGBT to have children is their choice, many still wish to be parents. Also, natural sterility is a rarer thing then homosexuality, if the sterility comes later in life it's a completely different issue. No arguement I can think of for the last part.

Didn't realise my part was bolded, silly browser and font size. Yes, it's open for criticism but there is adifference of a person who is racist out of hate and racist who doesn't know any better. One's just not a nice person, the other is illeducated. Many religious homophobes fall into the latter category and can be educated for better understanding and if they are true believers then their faith will remain intact, sometimes made stronger because they can understand the world better. Those who have blind hate, even if they base it on religion should be called out and named mind you.

You have no right to enforce laws that regulate other people's personal lives. Your business ends with yourself (which is why I said "mind your own business"). Making other people live their lives the way you want to is not something you can or should be able to do.

I don`t think there`s another term to substitute the commonly used "marriage".
The governments already accept as the same living in communion after a period of tim to have the same effects as being married, if i`m not mistaken.
Just to make it clear, when i said object gay marriage i also implied that in the case of a referendum about homosexual unions/civil parternship, for example, it would expectable for religious people to object any kind of union, since the starting point is already considered a sin.
I know this view will hurt gay people, but it`s our view and it`s nothing personnal.

Once again, where did i enforce anything? Did i even used the expression "you have to"? You are accsusing me, once again, of doing something that i didn`t. I shared an opinion regarding a subject, that was all. Where did i ever tried enforcing my view on anyone?

About civil gay marriage, read the post above this one, explaining why i and others could object to gay marriage.
It isn`t just the view regarding an institution, i hope that you can understand that.

Not the "Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve" argument. God also created gays, and for a gay person homosexuality is normal, natural, and makes them happy.

It can't be anything else but personal. Civil rights issues are thankfully never put to vote anyways. Otherwise we'd still be in the Middle Ages because of people like you.

What I uderstand is that your entire post is inconsistent. How can you say that you don't want to enforce anything, right after claiming that you'd vote against gay marriage, subsequently interfering in other people's personal lives, and forcing them to act the way you want to.

You're a liar!

It can't be anything else but personal. Civil rights issues are thankfully never put to vote anyways. Otherwise we'd still be in the Middle Ages because of people like you.