By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - Gaming explosions happen in prime number generations.

Gen 1: Odyssey. Failure.

Gen 2: Atari 2600. EXPLOSION. There had to be a gaming crash afterwards so there could be explosions in successive prime generations.

Gen 3: NES. EXPLOSION.

Gen 4: SNES and Genesis. Marginal growth.

Gen 5: PS1. EXPLOSION. Mostly in Europe.

Gen 6: PS2 and friends. Marginal growth.

Gen 7: Wii. EXPLOSION. However briefly...

Gen 8, 9, and 10: Zombie market. According to the perfect, infinite wisdom of prime numbers, the current sad state of affairs will last a long time. There are half a dozen gaming companies which can survive on the corpses of the others which are already dying all around. Gaming won't die, as start-ups will make brilliant games and pull in huge profits by self-distributing, but none will be able to launch a console and create another true explosion.

Gen 11: EXPLOSION. It has to be so.



"[Our former customers] are unable to find software which they WANT to play."
"The way to solve this problem lies in how to communicate what kind of games [they CAN play]."

Satoru Iwata, Nintendo President. Only slightly paraphrased.

Around the Network

Most of us would be too busy dying by the time for Gen 11.



Galaki said:

Most of us would be too busy dying by the time for Gen 11.


Dying? In 20 years? Why?



Any message from Faxanadu is written in good faith but shall neither be binding nor construed as constituting a commitment by Faxanadu except where provided for in a written agreement signed by an authorized representative of Faxanadu. This message is intended for the use of the forum members only.

The views expressed here may be personal and/or offensive and are not necessarily the views of Faxanadu.

Faxanadu said:
Galaki said:

Most of us would be too busy dying by the time for Gen 11.


Dying? In 20 years? Why?

Due to diminishing return in graphics and processing, we'll have a longer gen for the next 3 gens or so.

So, it's going to be longer than 20 years and many of us would be dying from some kind of cancer.



I don't really see how the ps2 is not an explosion when it's the highest selling home console

and I nominate galaki for something. Not sure what.



Around the Network
Erik Aston said:

Gen 1: Odyssey. Failure.

Gen 2: Atari 2600. EXPLOSION. There had to be a gaming crash afterwards so there could be explosions in successive prime generations.

Gen 3: NES. EXPLOSION.

Gen 4: SNES and Genesis. Marginal growth.

Gen 5: PS1. EXPLOSION. Mostly in Europe.

Gen 6: PS2 and friends. Marginal growth.

Gen 7: Wii. EXPLOSION. However briefly...

Gen 8, 9, and 10: Zombie market. According to the perfect, infinite wisdom of prime numbers, the current sad state of affairs will last a long time. There are half a dozen gaming companies which can survive on the corpses of the others which are already dying all around. Gaming won't die, as start-ups will make brilliant games and pull in huge profits by self-distributing, but none will be able to launch a console and create another true explosion.

Gen 11: EXPLOSION. It has to be so.

Sorry, but the biggest 'explosions' in the industry were Gen 2, 3 and 6 (Atari, NES and PS2).



Six upcoming games you should look into:

 

  

20 years sounds about right for the next 2D Mario.



Nov 2016 - NES outsells PS1 (JP)

Don't Play Stationary 4 ever. Switch!

"Gen 6: PS2 and friends. Marginal growth."

Hate to rain on your parade there, but no-one will take you seriously anymore after calling PS2's gen one of 'marginal' growth.



Dr.Grass said:

"Gen 6: PS2 and friends. Marginal growth."

Hate to rain on your parade there, but no-one will take you seriously anymore after calling PS2's gen one of 'marginal' growth.


I think it'll make everyone happy if it's listed as,

"Gen 6: PS2 and friends. Marginal growth and total domination."



Galaki said:
Dr.Grass said:

"Gen 6: PS2 and friends. Marginal growth."

Hate to rain on your parade there, but no-one will take you seriously anymore after calling PS2's gen one of 'marginal' growth.


I think it'll make everyone happy if it's listed as,

"Gen 6: PS2 and friends. Marginal growth and total domination."

Gen 5:

PSX over 100 million

N63 over 30 million

Saturn almost 10 million

TOTAL sales in Gen  5: Roughly 140 million

_____________________

Gen 6:

PS2 over 150 million

Xbox almost 25 million

Gamecube almost 22 million

Dreamcast over 10 million

TOTAL sales in Gen 6: Roughly 207 million

______________________

(207-140)/140*100

= roughly 50% growth

So the problem I have is with the 'marginal growth' statement.