| fkusumot said: They're both good games, right? |
NO Bioshock is a good game. SMG is a great game.
zombier said:
I didnt mean to sound harsh with the respect your opinion thing so i apologize for that. I know i should have talked about people who only played bioshock and not smg to, but we all know there are more ninty fanboys on this forum. But yea to me you have to have played good amount of both games to discuss this debate properly. Yes i know alot of people like to think of the prime series as an adventure game but its a fps too. Nintendo did a so-so job on both aspects of the game. There are better shooters(and dont argue the controller aspect because its still a mediocre shooter), and the adventure aspect has been done alot better inside nintendo itself with the zelda series. I know fps get high scores on most review sites. Another thing with the hardcore nintendo bunch is they cry that sites like ign dont know what they are talking about when a wii game gets a bad review. But when a wii game gets a good review they are like omg its better than *insert 360/ps3 game here* check game rankings! Such a double standard with fanboys |
MP3 is not GOTY status, but MP1 was pure genius.
Your double standard works for all that are essentially fanboys. Stereotyping it to one group is discrimination and nonetheless disturbing.
I've played almsot all games in the running, except the PC games cuase I don't play PC games but I understnad which are actualy good. But of the console games, SMG, COD4, and Mass Effect are the best games of this year, and I can't think of another game that even should be in the running with them. Bioshock is not on their level and doesn't deserve to be. I'm not speaking to you directly, simply restating my opinion.
Personally I don't know why reviewers like to review shooters so highly. There probably the most casual "hardcore" games of the genres out there, as they have an overly simplistic concept(shoot people), and normally the same with the gameplay. Usually action adventures and RPG's are the real hardcore type games, as those actually fit more of what the hardcore is looking for. But who knows why these hardcore reviewers like them. Although I respect there are some pretty damn good shooters out there, most of them tend to be overhyped simply because they are a shooter.
Zucas said:
NO Bioshock is a good game. SMG is a great game. |
They're both great games -> fact
You didn't like BioShock that much -> opinion
| fkusumot said: They're both good games, right? |
they both awesome games
Chrizum said:
They're both great games -> fact You didn't like BioShock that much -> opinion |
Yep. I don't think I claimed it to be a fact now did I.
But your claiming of them both being great games is not a fact. Quality is opinion based. No one can ever decide which game is good and which isn't, as it's always up to personal opinion. The entire backing of what's good, is opinion, and thus nothing ever is good or is bad. No factual basis to any of it.
Zucas said:
NO Bioshock is a good game. SMG is a great game. |
is that a fact sir? anyway i read your mini review of bioshock and im not 100% sure if you even played it. But if im wrong and you did play it im sorry.
smg is for children
halo3 is good
oblivion is good
gears of war is good
cod4 is good
assassins's creed is good
deadrising is good
wiisports is good
bob the builder: festival of fun is good
bioshock is ok
i've never played bioshock, but i' gonna buy SMG, maybe i'm biased but IMO SMG deserves to be the GOTY, overrated??
| nero said: i've never played bioshock, but i' gonna buy SMG, maybe i'm biased but IMO SMG deserves to be the GOTY, overrated?? |
smg is for children. dont buy it.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
bob the builder : festival of fun, i like
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
