imaprettyhotguy said:
Kasz216 said:
imaprettyhotguy said:
Kasz216 said:
imaprettyhotguy said:
Kasz216 said: Everyone was reporting about RROD long after it happened... ok, and what was the point of showing the hardest of the hardcore Microsoft people thinking about leaving PS3?
Then you'll have no problem finding a much harsher article from Yahoo with around the same date? Right.
Lets be honest here, the one with an agenda here isn't me... and it's a pretty crappy agenda, because if your going to bother to have one, it may as well be one that benefits you in some way. Trying so hard to go out of your way to have Sony's back has literally zero benefit.
|
It happened on launch day and that one was way after launch date, and yes vast majority of articles would be harsher, I made a mistake today, I missed one word in Sony's statement but you've made like 5 since I started talking to you it's pretty pathetic
|
What happened on launch day? I don't think you seem to quite comprhend my point which was... that article, happened LONG after RROD happened, after RROD was basically considered "solved" by the media. MSNBC, was reopening those wounds and saying "Hey it's still a huge problem, look at this... and by the way Microsoft has a history of releasing game consoles that are broken at launch."
Though, at least I have that confirmation that the reason you stopped argueing points is because you realized you were wrong, and just didn't want to admit it.
Just about 10 more posts and you'll be ready to admit you were wrong about this.
|
One point was wrong, rest are fine, and there are tons of articles saying it and RROD happend on launch day, honestly how have you survived, I think darwin was wrong about his theory of evolution
|
Where did I say RROD didn't happen on launch day? I'm going to bold the parts of my post you apparently didn't read... which is basically the whole thing.
You somehow twisted yourself into argueing my point for me at this point.
As for the snippy Darwin comments... that kinda shows a lack of understanding about natual biology and mankind. Man transcended evolution a long time ago, ever since we developed tools that adapted the enviorment to us.
|
How can you not be familiar with darwins theory, honestly how many times must you fail before you realize just how dumb you are, and I should of worded it simply, you asked what happened on launch day I answered, why is that so hard for you?
|
A) Your entire downplaying of that artice appears to be "It happened at launch".
The "it happened at launch" you are referring to... is RROD.
So.... uh. What exactly was your point.
B) Human kind has surpassed the need for having to adapt to nature. Therefore current human evolution isn't based on "survival of the fittist" mindset in which you were implying.
Not that it really would of been relevent anyway... since physical attributes were deemed more important then mental ones before then. Or so it was theorized.
It's actually a pretty easy concept to understand.