By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Why Has Blu-ray Failed to Catch Hold?

Why Has Blu-ray Failed to Catch Hold?

By John R. Quain

Published April 19, 2011

| FoxNews.com

My VCR is stashed in a closet, right next to a couple of CD-ROM players, a laser disc player, and other forgotten electronics. Is my Blu-ray player about to join them?

Strategy Analytics researcher Peter King recently said his analysts were surprised that DVD player sales continued to be so strong against Blu-ray players. That reminded me of what some critics have suspected: Blu-ray really hasn't caught on -- and probably never will.

"I'm surprised DVDs have continued to hang on," said King, referring to the fact that player sales of over 20 million units in the U.S. last year were pretty much evenly split between DVD and Blu-ray models. His figures show that Blu-ray player sales will surpass DVD sales by the end of this year ... but only slightly.

Blu-ray discs and players are clearly superior to DVDs, offering more features and a better picture overall. Blu-ray players connected to the Web can offer games, extra movie features, and additional bonus materials online that DVD players generally can't. And the latest Blu-ray players can handle 3D discs, something no DVD player can do.

So why haven't shoppers been impressed? It can't be the price. Walmart sells Blu-ray players for as little as $70.

Researchers suggest the reason Blu-ray has struggled is the old war with competing format HD DVD (a war Blu-ray eventually won). But more important, they say, is that consumers have just failed to understand the benefits of Blu-ray. King told me consumers don't realize that DVDs can be played on Blu-ray machines and erroneously believe they'll have to replace their entire DVD collection if they get a Blu-ray player.

Blu-ray won the format war over 3 years ago, giving it plenty of time to build momentum. And most consumers aren't worried about replacing discs; they worry that if they get a Blu-ray player and start buying expensive Blu-ray versions of new movies, the discs won't play in their friends' DVD players or in the backseat of the car. They're right. (As if to prove it, many titles are now offered in Blu-ray and DVD combo packs.)

The real reason Blu-ray players never went mainstream? Quite frankly they were never that good. 

There wasn't enough of a qualitative difference between the picture offered by an upconverted DVD and that of a Blu-ray disc. Sure, analysts and reviewers can tell the difference (most of the time), but it isn't a significant enough difference to make viewers sit up and take notice. It wasn't like the jump from VCRs to DVD players or from giant tube TVs to flat screens.

And now it may be too late for Blu-ray.

Recent research by analysts at NPD has shown that 77 percent of viewers still watch movies on disc, meaning there's hope for Blu-ray. On the other hand, after years of Hollywood studios fighting the trend, the future is clear: Movies and video are moving to online streaming services. No more video stores. No more discs and late fees. 

Simply rent or buy the movie online and get it via Netflix, Amazon or Vudu. It won't be as sharp a picture as that offered by a Blu-ray disc, but you don't have to get off the couch. Indeed, it's such a significant trend that the makers of Blu-ray players were forced to add the very streaming services they compete against to their own players.

Of course, few technologies disappear overnight, and Blu-ray is no exception. And it's likely that as DVD devices gradually wear out, Blu-ray players will become the majority as consumers replace older models. 

Or maybe we'll all just skip the Blu-ray upgrade and move straight to streaming rentals. If that's the case, my Blu-ray player could land in the closet before the end of the year.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/04/19/feeling-blue-blu-ray/#ixzz1K02rvri7



PS4 Preordered - 06/11/2013 @09:30am

XBox One Preordered - 06/19/2013 @07:57pm

"I don't trust #XboxOne & #Kinect 2.0, it's always connected" as you tweet from your smartphone - irony 0_o

Around the Network

media cost difference between DVD and Bluray doesn't justify the minimal difference in capability.

Only bluray I have purchased was because Amazon sold a Bluray/DVD combo pack of Avatar for $13.

Otherwise I'd buy the $10 DVD version over a $15plus bluray. Just not worth it.



Consumers aren't that stupid. They don't "fail" to understand the benefits of Blu-Ray, they just don't see it as worth it



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Mr Khan said:

Consumers aren't that stupid. They don't "fail" to understand the benefits of Blu-Ray, they just don't see it as worth it


exactly.

VHS was a far inferior product to DVD. Huge difference in video/sound quality, huge differnce in ease of use, etc. So the $5 more it initially cost to buy the DVD over the VHS was worth it.

However, in bluray, you only get a marginal video/sound increase that the mass consumer doesn't even really notice or care about because all the Bluray players play DVDs and upscale them.

Bluray needs to be the same price or simply remove DVD as an option.



Mr Khan said:

Consumers aren't that stupid.

Please tell me that's sarcasm....



PS4 Preordered - 06/11/2013 @09:30am

XBox One Preordered - 06/19/2013 @07:57pm

"I don't trust #XboxOne & #Kinect 2.0, it's always connected" as you tweet from your smartphone - irony 0_o

Around the Network

I buy blu-rays because my parents steal my dvds and I never get them back >:( 

This way when I buy a movie I know I'm the only one in the house that can watch it 



Sig thanks to Saber! :D 

Blu ray will take time, its still not competitively priced against DVDs and blu ray is only noticiable to those with HD tvs. so it will take time for this tech to saturate the market.



I think they're too expensive to buy just for the hell of it. I basically buy blu-rays that are basically heavy visually like say pan's labyrinth, or crouching tiger.

DVD's you could by for the hell of it cause it was much cheaper. And now you can torrent them easily. If you don't have an HD tv, or higher quality speakers blu-ray's difference is decreased.



Well... saw this coming.

I'm surprised nobody is popping out of the woodwork like when i kept comparing pure disc sales and numbers and marketshare vs DVD  and how it did vs VHS.... and the flaws with the player studies including things like PS3s.

Still though, honestly Blu-ray isn't doing THAT badly.  

Blu-ray was NEVER DVD in terms of adoption.  The earlier claims that it was is all smoke and mirrors focusing on whatever way they could frame it to make Blu-ray look like the biggest hit ever. 

Nobody is just willing to push people off the cliff and say "blu-ray only" probably do too things like Netflix and the economy tanking.

For people who have kept a realistic view of the whole thing rather then buying into all the fake PR numbers... i'd say Blu-ray is doing quite well.



Sort of off topic but Blu Ray is fucking awesome whend bundled. Just came back from the store.

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1 DVD Standard Edition: $19.99

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1 Blu- Ray/DVD/Digital Copy Combo Pack: $24.99

Only someone w/o a BR player would choose the first one. I guess some people find it too much of a hassle to upgrade when DVD's are still comparable.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1gWECYYOSo

Please Watch/Share this video so it gets shown in Hollywood.