There's a lot of speculation that MS/Sony will now have to launch new systems to compete with (rumoured) Wii2.
If the rumours are correct, the exact opposite may be true. It could extend this current generation's life.
As the Wii2 is only rumoured to be a little more powerful than PS3, it in no way makes the current HD consoles obsolete. Fact is, 3rd parties will merely port over games already in development to Wii2, without needing to pull away any resources from the HD twins.
Moreover, MS and in particular Sony, only recently started making money after losing billions initially. If they were to react by going to yet another generation both would wipe out any chance of having been really profitable this gen. Both, and Sony especially are better served sharing 3rd parties games with Wii2 and Sony in particular allowing it's very strong first party line-up of games to differientiate it from Wii2. Fact is, Nintendo's first party and Sony's first party largely appeal to different people. MS lacking a lot of exclusive content nowadays would need to rely on Kinect more but could still remain competitive and moreover - profittable!
Nintendo could continue support on Wii (similar to how they did NES looong into SNES life) porting games from 3DS to it and vice versa thereby supporting both without needing more studios to do so. A $99 Wii could be focused on attracting ever more non-gamers to games with games like Wii Relax while Wii2 acts as a logical next step for Wii owners wanting to 'upgrade' to HD and more 'core' experiences but offering the best of both worlds (Casual/Core).
In this respect Wii2 competes effectively with PS3/Move and 360/Kinect while maintaining it's distinct Nintendo flavour. There's simply no reason for Sony/MS to push into a new generation. The current one continues as long as all three remain profitable in it.
Furthermore, if they were to goto 720/PS4 what would that look like? They both just introduced new controls, so the next step would have to be more power. At this point we've hit the point of depreciating returns for graphics (as proven by Wii outselling them for years). Being prettier and handling even more on screen action wouldn't make for very much difference in gameplay all in all. All it would do is make their systems either: A) expensive or B) Huge loss leaders again. I doubt very much Sony can possibly afford more years of losing money on SCE and even MS shareholders have their limits (although I'd expect MS to be the first true 8th gen console)
As is, Sony and MS would both be better served continuing with their current systems for another 3-4 maybe 5 years. Once those new systems do finally come out, Nintendo would shortly follow with Wii3 (a year or so after and still 4-5 years after Wii2). This means Wii2 is probably not the start of the 8th generation. The 8th gen will more likely imo be 720/PS4/Wii3.
Ironically, this makes Pachter right for once. Wii2 is his long promised WiiHD not the start of a new gen.








