By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - TSA: Your 6 years old daughter may be a terrorist

NotStan on 13 April 2011

I think she went a bit far with that inspection. A quick frisk would have been suffice, that just looks like she assumed that the child is a mule or something.



Disconnect and self destruct, one bullet a time.

Around the Network
sapphi_snake on 13 April 2011
Rath said:
Galaki said:

Well then. Start teaching your kids that strangers touching you is all fine now.


The parent was clearly there at the time. It's not equivalent to a stranger in a dark alley or something.

@Sapphi. A paedophile is somebody attracted to children, any evidence that the woman was getting anything at all sexual from that? It was her job and she did it.

 

I'm assuming this person refused to do the scan that means you don't get frisked. Honest truth, terrorists would be willing to use kids if they knew that they could bypass security with them. You can't just not search some people.

I was just kidding, but seriously, I wouldn't want my kids (if I had any) being touched like that by anyone. Plus, let's be honest here, Islamic terrorists are generally Middle Eastern, and there's no way that girl or her parents were Middle Eastern.



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

sapphi_snake on 13 April 2011
Rath said:
Galaki said:
Rath said:
Galaki said:

Well then. Start teaching your kids that strangers touching you is all fine now.


The parent was clearly there at the time. It's not equivalent to a stranger in a dark alley or something.

@Sapphi. A paedophile is somebody attracted to children, any evidence that the woman was getting anything at all sexual from that? It was her job and she did it.

 

I'm assuming this person refused to do the scan that means you don't get frisked. Honest truth, terrorists would be willing to use kids if they knew that they could bypass security with them. You can't just not search some people.


So, it's okay to touch your kids if you're there to watch? What kind of a sick person are you enjoying a stranger touching your own kid?

Do you have any evidence that the woman wasn't getting anything at all sexual from that?

Jesus Christ, I hope you're trolling.

Hey, he's answer is fair. Do you have any proof she wasn't aroused?



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

Rath on 13 April 2011
sapphi_snake said:

I was just kidding, but seriously, I wouldn't want my kids (if I had any) being touched like that by anyone. Plus, let's be honest here, Islamic terrorists are generally Middle Eastern, and there's no way that girl or her parents were Middle Eastern.


It's best that everybody has to go through the same protocols, otherwise somebody who looks innocuous will slip through the net. I fully expect that the intelligence apparatus will pick out more likely nationalities to focus on, but security like this should be universally applied.

Also, I haven't been to the US since the security changes, but am I right in saying that the girl wouldn't have been touched at all if she'd gone through the scanner?



Rath on 13 April 2011
sapphi_snake said:
Rath said:

Jesus Christ, I hope you're trolling.

Hey, he's answer is fair. Do you have any proof she wasn't aroused?


Him accusing me of being a sick person who likes watching the children being touched was fair? o.O

That was the part I was referring to.



Around the Network
sapphi_snake on 13 April 2011
Rath said:
sapphi_snake said:
Rath said:
 

Jesus Christ, I hope you're trolling.

Hey, he's answer is fair. Do you have any proof she wasn't aroused?


Him accusing me of being a sick person who likes watching the children being touched was fair? o.O

That was the part I was referring to.

Oh sorry, didn't notice that. But do you have any proof that you're not??? (LOL)



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

sapphi_snake on 13 April 2011
Rath said:
sapphi_snake said:
 

I was just kidding, but seriously, I wouldn't want my kids (if I had any) being touched like that by anyone. Plus, let's be honest here, Islamic terrorists are generally Middle Eastern, and there's no way that girl or her parents were Middle Eastern.


It's best that everybody has to go through the same protocols, otherwise somebody who looks innocuous will slip through the net. I fully expect that the intelligence apparatus will pick out more likely nationalities to focus on, but security like this should be universally applied.

Also, I haven't been to the US since the security changes, but am I right in saying that the girl wouldn't have been touched at all if she'd gone through the scanner?

Yeah, this is fair I guess. She should've jsut gone through the scanner. Are there health risks regarding that?



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

Porcupine_I on 13 April 2011

it's what children play!

 



“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”

- George Orwell, ‘1984’

Galaki on 13 April 2011
sapphi_snake said:

She should've jsut gone through the scanner. Are there health risks regarding that?

Take a salted bath before going through the scanner?

 

There's already numerous reports and tests done that people just go through with weapons and never got caught. The entire thing is just security theater.

How do you justify your children getting touched is beyond me. The risk of another 9/11 is zero. People will jump on any terrorist now, i.e. underwear bomber.

The only reason people didn't jump the terrorists prior 9/11 because they didn't think they'd die if they just stay put.

On top of that, the cockpit has been fortified and nobody can enter.

Are you going to let your children get grope by strangers as long as it's in the name of security?

Hey, guess what. The risk of getting hit by a car is much greater than a plane attack. Your children should get feel up by any passing cops just to be safe. Who knows if some terrorist might use your children as mules at some point on the streets, right?



Pre-order limited edition Blue Slime Condoms

Soleron on 13 April 2011
Galaki said:
sapphi_snake said:

She should've jsut gone through the scanner. Are there health risks regarding that?

The risk of another 9/11 is zero.

More importantly, the risk of 9/11 is unchanged by this security, because it's been shown that a sufficiently determined person can hide things while going through the scanner.

Ever heard of a casual terrorist, like they're going through the scanner and it beeps and they pull out a gun and he's like 'You got me, but I didn't want to hide it REALLY well cos I'm not srs".