By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Official Mortal Kombat Review Thread!

i just hope its controller friendly. I really dont want to go out and buy an arcade stick. the controls for street fighter 4 is horrible enough you actually need the arcade stick to play good :(



Around the Network

That IGN review is actually bullshit lol.

Knocking marks off because a fighting game has a cheesy story mode. When that fighting game is Mortal Kombat... The story WILL be cheesy if you have any idea of the games history.

It's one of the only games this gen to be in 1080p, and it actually looks great too, yet it gets that graphics score...  Gets cut because the art style hasn't changed much since 1992? WHAT!? Does this mean Street Fighter whatever should be cut down on marks? Mario? Metal Gear Solid? Halo?

The games online component is hardly mentioned at all...

He says there are 4 sections of the super gauge, yet there are 3...

Getting a 6 on presentation because you can't pause/skip cutscenes...

Yeah. It's like he's hardly played the series at all, isn't a fan of the game and just wants to mark it down for silly little things.



                            

GameTrailers gave it 9.4.



Carl2291 said:

That IGN review is actually bullshit lol.

Knocking marks off because a fighting game has a cheesy story mode. When that fighting game is Mortal Kombat... The story WILL be cheesy if you have any idea of the games history.

It's one of the only games this gen to be in 1080p, and it actually looks great too, yet it gets that graphics score...  Gets cut because the art style hasn't changed much since 1992? WHAT!? Does this mean Street Fighter whatever should be cut down on marks? Mario? Metal Gear Solid? Halo?

The games online component is hardly mentioned at all...

He says there are 4 sections of the super gauge, yet there are 3...

Getting a 6 on presentation because you can't pause/skip cutscenes...

Yeah. It's like he's hardly played the series at all, isn't a fan of the game and just wants to mark it down for silly little things.

Wait till you see this one

http://xbox-360.nowgamer.com/reviews/xbox-360/9763/mortal-kombat

Edit - They're not on meta, thank fuck.



 

Seece said:
Carl2291 said:

That IGN review is actually bullshit lol.

Knocking marks off because a fighting game has a cheesy story mode. When that fighting game is Mortal Kombat... The story WILL be cheesy if you have any idea of the games history.

It's one of the only games this gen to be in 1080p, and it actually looks great too, yet it gets that graphics score...  Gets cut because the art style hasn't changed much since 1992? WHAT!? Does this mean Street Fighter whatever should be cut down on marks? Mario? Metal Gear Solid? Halo?

The games online component is hardly mentioned at all...

He says there are 4 sections of the super gauge, yet there are 3...

Getting a 6 on presentation because you can't pause/skip cutscenes...

Yeah. It's like he's hardly played the series at all, isn't a fan of the game and just wants to mark it down for silly little things.

Wait till you see this one

http://xbox-360.nowgamer.com/reviews/xbox-360/9763/mortal-kombat

Edit - They're not on meta, thank fuck.

I....I....can't believe what I just saw:

Better than:

Worse than:

So Mortal Kombat, a fighting game....is worse than the kinect fighting game?

 

I what?



Around the Network

With Portal 2 release and amazing reviews I forgot to check Mortal Kombat reviews.

I like to see good reviews.



again showing how fucked up reviewers are. i knew ign's review wasn gonna be bullshit when he said he didnt like the artstyle.

thank god we have gametrailers, they atleast have decency.



Being in 3rd place never felt so good

Some of the review are iffy. IGN gave it a 6 out of 10 for presentation and call MK out on poor story when compare to none MK video game effort.... what???? They gave Marvel vs Capcom a 7.5 for presentation and that game had NO story to talk about a 2 page comic strip as ending for every character and was stripped to the bones on availible contents. You have got to be shitting me! What are fighting game lately that had 'great story'??? Street Fighter? Boob or Alive? Boob Calibur? What a joke.

edit: I am in a bit of a rant mode here so I'll add further. This IGN review was SHIT. It gave a brief background story, complained about the poor story and went to complain that the single player mode is NOT FUCKEN FAIR because you're fighting at 1v2 odd somtimes and the boss fights are 'broken'

Holy fucken shit you dumbass, not only do you not go into details about anything actually relevant like modes, features, single player content, bonus unlockables and actual technical issues that are relevant. The only thing you can rant about is that the single player isn't fair??? Do you complain that single player FPS aren't fair when they pit you against 10 AI enemy that are shooting at your at once? What about the final boss with his broken mechanic? *bitch whine* DUDE DIDN'T STAGGER!!!!?!?! WTF

Well why don't you go back Marvel vs Street Fighter and bitch about Galactus!!!!  Baby Jesus is crying man! It's not fair, Galactus has more HP and he takes up HALF THE FREAKIN SCREEN!!! WHY IS THE BOSS SO BROKEN DUDE?

BECAUSE HE IS A BOSS DIP SHIT!

Seriously, this review needs to be taken down and re-done so its more like a review and less like an opinion piece from some random blog.

Professional journalism my ass.




mibuokami said:

Some of the review are iffy. IGN gave it a 6 out of 10 for presentation and call MK out on poor story when compare to none MK video game effort.... what???? They gave Marvel vs Capcom a 7.5 for presentation and that game had NO story to talk about a 2 page comic strip as ending for every character and was stripped to the bones on availible contents. You have got to be shitting me! What are fighting game lately that had 'great story'??? Street Fighter? Boob or Alive? Boob Calibur? What a joke.

Yup, it should get points just for having a story. Ludicrus to think it's score could have been higher if it hadn't been included



 

Seece said:
mibuokami said:

Some of the review are iffy. IGN gave it a 6 out of 10 for presentation and call MK out on poor story when compare to none MK video game effort.... what???? They gave Marvel vs Capcom a 7.5 for presentation and that game had NO story to talk about a 2 page comic strip as ending for every character and was stripped to the bones on availible contents. You have got to be shitting me! What are fighting game lately that had 'great story'??? Street Fighter? Boob or Alive? Boob Calibur? What a joke.

Yup, it should get points just for having a story. Ludicrus to think it's score could have been higher if it hadn't been included

The more I read from that review the more piss off I get, I've edited my previous post with a more serious rant. In short its a piece of shit review that SHOULDN'T have made it pass editorial. It gave virtually no relevant details on a very big portion of the game and didn't even touch up on the actual character balance, which is the MOST IMPORTANT SHIT you can have in a fighting game (instead he bitched about single player balance). This feels like some random jo-blow's opinion blog and the editor at ign should think long and hard on what is more valueble. deadline and zero-hour review or an actual review that gives them credibility. I will never trust their review on fighting game again. This is just so completely shit that it has turn me off them IGN for good.