By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Seece said:
mibuokami said:

Some of the review are iffy. IGN gave it a 6 out of 10 for presentation and call MK out on poor story when compare to none MK video game effort.... what???? They gave Marvel vs Capcom a 7.5 for presentation and that game had NO story to talk about a 2 page comic strip as ending for every character and was stripped to the bones on availible contents. You have got to be shitting me! What are fighting game lately that had 'great story'??? Street Fighter? Boob or Alive? Boob Calibur? What a joke.

Yup, it should get points just for having a story. Ludicrus to think it's score could have been higher if it hadn't been included

The more I read from that review the more piss off I get, I've edited my previous post with a more serious rant. In short its a piece of shit review that SHOULDN'T have made it pass editorial. It gave virtually no relevant details on a very big portion of the game and didn't even touch up on the actual character balance, which is the MOST IMPORTANT SHIT you can have in a fighting game (instead he bitched about single player balance). This feels like some random jo-blow's opinion blog and the editor at ign should think long and hard on what is more valueble. deadline and zero-hour review or an actual review that gives them credibility. I will never trust their review on fighting game again. This is just so completely shit that it has turn me off them IGN for good.