that sounds good. I'd buy it.

Don't get me wrong, I would love one.  But I would prefer it if Sakurai and HAL, Project Sora or whoever develops it were to concentrate their effects onto a SBB game for the Wii's successor

It definitely has not been rumored enough with sufficient evidence.  I've seen the bits and pieces and the biggest influence on the rumor is fan support, not actual clues.  An yes I might be alone on my opinion, but that says nothing about the quality of the opinion.  I don't think your argument that my opinion is biased is going to go much further.  If it was in response to me calling the movement for porting such a classic "retarded" then I'll apologize; I didn't feel it came off strongly as it was not directed towards anyone's comment in particular.  Otherwise I'd rather not continue this.

My biggest complaint comes from a general disdain for a lack of new content built specifically for new hardware.  I always feel software shows it's potential (all elements, rather than some) the most when it is built from the ground up for the hardware it is being released on.  I love smash, but it's gone through 3 extensive iterations on the home console.  There is now a new piece of hardware with new potential - lets build something new in the fighter genre that showcases that potential.

Even if we love smash, another game can encompass some of its awesome quailities, but creating a new smash, or worse, porting an old version over, only limits some of the aspects that were present on the hardware it was built for.  To me those include the local multiplayer (especially for an off the wall fighter), screen size (smash heavily utilized the "off-screen" element), a tailored controller (DS controls are not nearly as fitting as the home console controllers), and as brawl proved, an amazing soundtrack (DS speakers would be a letdown, yes headphones are an option).

Damn thats an awesome wiki

That was a much better comment than your first. Giving an intelligent decision sometimes helps. As far as rumors go, interviews with nintendo people has hinted at Smash Bros. It doesn't mean its going to happen, but it is an option if they choose so.  

Can you please explain to me, why do you despie competitive smash so much?

I mean, it's not like it had any effect on you, and 99.9% of the pepole who played Smash.

Why any of you have an objection about pepole who like to be really good in a game, and potentially make some money (if not a living) out of it? Why do you think it is a good thing that Nintendo just destroyed quite a large community, just for the sake of it?

Now, just to make myself clear, I do think that pepole who are good at Smash and actually play seriously against their friends, and try to force their "rules" are assholes (I was like that before), but if some pepole enjoy play a game, in a certain way, why do you think they should not be allowed to, or that their enjoyment should be misallowed?

I'm really into competitive Starcraft 2. I've paid out >$100 this year for HD livestreams of tournaments. No way am I against esports.

It is the attitude of the community and the complaining about how SSBB ruined everything that I am against. No, it's not affecting me or stopping me enjoying it, but the article is funny and I hope Nintendo continue to not listen to these people when making future games, because it would stop being fun for casual SSB players such as myself if bug exploitation like wavedashing was required to be any good.

Blizzard managed to balance their game such that top level play is exciting and casual play is fun and accessible.

I don't think they shit on anybody with the last Brawl... but the online could have been better. Just hope they don't make the same mistake next time...