By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - It's official: The Graphics King is now crowned

 

It's official: The Graphics King is now crowned

duh 211 67.20%
 
no, its a lie 103 32.80%
 
Total:314
osamanobama said:
AussieGecko said:
kowenicki said:


hi there big fella.  Why wouldnt I?

Still going on about this?  wow... quiet month at your house?

If lens of truth says its a graphics king then so be it...  have fun.


yeah its pretty funny when they think an xbox version looks better they are not to be trusted but a ps3 anything, OMG ITS FREAKING GOSPEL

when have i ever complained about LoT.

i take their word even if their analyis disagreees with my eyes


Same here.



Around the Network

I just knew Killzone 3 would win, my time with both the Killzone 3 and Crysis 2 (PS3 AND 360) betas led me to the conclusion that KZ3 was the better game.

Well, in multiplayer anyway.



SpartenOmega117 said:
ZaneWane said:

OP and his Sony pals need to accept that media and anyone else with pair of working eyes has crowned Crysis 2 the best graphics on consoles and should just move on.


since when have we ever accepted the media? Crysis 2 is probably the best looking game on PC but on consoles how can we "crown" a game that has as many bad things about it as good things.

We have always accepted the media and i can assure you the bad things about you keep hearing about Crysis 2 are overexaggerated mostly by Sony fans like OP and like i said media and anyone with pair of working eyes have already made up their mind and there is nothing that OP or his pals can do about it so its best they move on and focus on more important issues.



osamanobama said:

Lens of Truth has just announced that Killzone 3 is the console graphics king, handily beating Crysis in the head to head.

Conclusion: Although Crysis 2 looks fantastic on both the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3, the graphics crown still belongs to Guerrilla’s Killzone 3. Not only does Killzone 3 look graphically better, the performance its more stable throughout. That being said, with serious graphical contenders on the horizon such as Battlefield 3 and RAGE, how long can Killzone 3 hold on to the title? We’ll just have to wait and see!

well, do you guys agree, or are they wrong?

http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head/head2head-killzone-3-vs-crysis-2-analysis/

 

edit: more proof that ign lied

does anyone know of a way to contact ign, to show them this and DF, to show them they lied

A- It's not official. KZ3 is indeed technically superior to the multipltat Crysis 2 but just cause LOT says so doesn't make it official. Correct me if I'm wrong but I think LOT announced the FPS graphics king.

B- No one lied, IGN just are shit for technical comparison, they don't have a clue.

C- And what about DF, what have they said that is a lie? DF is the most comprehensive comparison site going but they only compare the same games which makes sense. I enjoy reading LOTs exotic comparisons of different games but at the end of the day they are different games which set out to do different things etc etc etc.



Ssenkahdavic said:

I still think the best looking games on the PS3 are:

Valyaria Chronicles and Eternal Sonata.

Tho my opinion is just that, mine.

All the way, man, all the way.

OT: Why do people debate so hard over graphics with such close calls? Seriously.



Rockstar: Announce Bully 2 already and make gamers proud!

Kojima: Come out with Project S already!

Around the Network
ZaneWane said:
SpartenOmega117 said:
ZaneWane said:

OP and his Sony pals need to accept that media and anyone else with pair of working eyes has crowned Crysis 2 the best graphics on consoles and should just move on.


since when have we ever accepted the media? Crysis 2 is probably the best looking game on PC but on consoles how can we "crown" a game that has as many bad things about it as good things.

We have always accepted the media and i can assure you the bad things about you keep hearing about Crysis 2 are overexaggerated mostly by Sony fans like OP and like i said media and anyone with pair of working eyes have already made up their mind and there is nothing that OP or his pals can do about it so its best they move on and focus on more important issues.


I have crysis 2 for xbox 360 and i have a good pair of working eyes. Crysis 2 =/=graphics king on console



trasharmdsister12 said:
NotStan said:

Really people, getting heated over something as menial such as this is an indication that there is something missing in your life, nor the people who are gloating any better, overall this hasn't impacted my day in any way, I still have a boatload of maths to do.

This is neither the time nor the place for logical reasoning! Go to your room and do some maths young man!

well said.



PS One/2/p/3slim/Vita owner. I survived the Apocalyps3/Collaps3 and all I got was this lousy signature.


Xbox One: What are you doing Dave?

Badassbab said:
osamanobama said:

Lens of Truth has just announced that Killzone 3 is the console graphics king, handily beating Crysis in the head to head.

Conclusion: Although Crysis 2 looks fantastic on both the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3, the graphics crown still belongs to Guerrilla’s Killzone 3. Not only does Killzone 3 look graphically better, the performance its more stable throughout. That being said, with serious graphical contenders on the horizon such as Battlefield 3 and RAGE, how long can Killzone 3 hold on to the title? We’ll just have to wait and see!

well, do you guys agree, or are they wrong?

http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head/head2head-killzone-3-vs-crysis-2-analysis/

 

edit: more proof that ign lied

does anyone know of a way to contact ign, to show them this and DF, to show them they lied

A- It's not official. KZ3 is indeed technically superior to the multipltat Crysis 2 but just cause LOT says so doesn't make it official. Correct me if I'm wrong but I think LOT announced the FPS graphics king.

B- No one lied, IGN just are shit for technical comparison, they don't have a clue.

C- And what about DF, what have they said that is a lie? DF is the most comprehensive comparison site going but they only compare the same games which makes sense. I enjoy reading LOTs exotic comparisons of different games but at the end of the day they are different games which set out to do different things etc etc etc.

you mis understood, i want people to show ign what DF and LOT said, because ign lied. not DF (DF is very profesional)



huaxiong90 said:
Ssenkahdavic said:

I still think the best looking games on the PS3 are:

Valyaria Chronicles and Eternal Sonata.

Tho my opinion is just that, mine.

All the way, man, all the way.

OT: Why do people debate so hard over graphics with such close calls? Seriously.

Trust me.  You are better off with NEVER getting an answer to that.



This little PS3 fanboy meltdown has been fun to watch. The insecurity is hilarious. So a multiplat looks as good as your best games, get over it.