By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - It's official: The Graphics King is now crowned

 

It's official: The Graphics King is now crowned

duh 211 67.20%
 
no, its a lie 103 32.80%
 
Total:314
Doobie_wop said:
LordMatrix said:
-Newcloud- said:

I think that killzone 3 is better overall while crysis 2 is great its also a total mess the single play is unbeliveably buggy and the multiplayer is IMO completly f**ked


Not sure what  version you played but those issues you had with Crysis 2 don`t seem to be anywhere on my X360 copy.

I'm sorry to call you out, but your not telling the full truth. I played the 360 version and it has to be one of the most technically flawed games I've played this generation. I made a thread about it, you should probably read it. 

Crysis 2 is a great game, but it will never be the best looking game. Anything with a framerate that plummets, pop in that appears at every turn, has a sub-HD resolution, ugly character models and ridiculous bugs, can't be the best looking game on consoles.

I had all these issues with the game and Digital Foundry and LOT can back up my claims with their own expert analysis. You may have had less trouble, but having none is impossible.

@Selnor. Your also grossly overestating how large the environments are, which usuaully flactuates between extremely linear and a small sanbox with a few different paths to reach the same objective. Crysis 2 isn't Far Cry 2, hell, it's not much more open than Halo: Reach.

Crysis 2 is still a great game and I wish it ran better, but after seven hours I had to just put it down, because a man can only take dumb AI, enemies getting stuck in buildings and game crashing bugs so many times before it drives them away. 


Maybe yours had issues but I never came across any. I have heard that the PS3 had some bug issues though. So you had bugs on your X360 copy doesn`t mean I was lying about mine.



 How our favorite systems are just like humans and sometimes have issues finding their special someone...

Xbox 360 wants to KinectPS3 wants to Move!  Why are both systems having such relationship problems?  The reason is they both become so infactuated with desire while watching the Wii as it waggles on by. They simply want what they can't have.

 Official member of the Xbox 360 Squad

Around the Network
kowenicki said:


hi there big fella.  Why wouldnt I?

Still going on about this?  wow... quiet month at your house?

If lens of truth says its a graphics king then so be it...  have fun.


yeah its pretty funny when they think an xbox version looks better they are not to be trusted but a ps3 anything, OMG ITS FREAKING GOSPEL



 

Bet with Conegamer and Doobie_wop 

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3879752

OP and his Sony pals need to accept that media and anyone else with pair of working eyes has crowned Crysis 2 the best graphics on consoles and should just move on.



ZaneWane said:

OP and his Sony pals need to accept that media and anyone else with pair of working eyes has crowned Crysis 2 the best graphics on consoles and should just move on.



welcome to the boards...you'll fit right in it seems...



PS One/2/p/3slim/Vita owner. I survived the Apocalyps3/Collaps3 and all I got was this lousy signature.


Xbox One: What are you doing Dave?

Wagram said:

There is a lot of butt hurt in this thread.


With this is context...

I read a little more that half this thread (which is more than enough) to see that what you said seems VERY true.  In fact, here are some "statistics" from Lens of Truth.  At the time of this post:

:PS3 Winners ( 14 )

:Xbox 360 Winners ( 38 )

:Tie ( 25 )

So a PS3 fanboy can cry foul at Lens of Truth for "favoring" the Xbox 360 over the PS3.  But we have some of you discrediting Lens of Truth as a source for awarding K3 as the graphics king.  So maybe we should not recognize the results when Xbox 360 is the winner over the PS3 which seems to happen a lot anyway by a large or minute margin.  Or does everything has to be so "XBOX 360 BEATS PS3" with some of you?



Around the Network
Ajescent said:
ZaneWane said:

OP and his Sony pals need to accept that media and anyone else with pair of working eyes has crowned Crysis 2 the best graphics on consoles and should just move on.



welcome to the boards...you'll fit right in it seems...

No he's a MS supporter.

trololollolo

/runs away.

OT: Really people, getting heated over something as menial such as this is an indication that there is something missing in your life, nor the people who are gloating any better, overall this hasn't impacted my day in any way, I still have a boatload of maths to do.



Disconnect and self destruct, one bullet a time.

Doobie_wop said:
LordMatrix said:
-Newcloud- said:

I think that killzone 3 is better overall while crysis 2 is great its also a total mess the single play is unbeliveably buggy and the multiplayer is IMO completly f**ked


Not sure what  version you played but those issues you had with Crysis 2 don`t seem to be anywhere on my X360 copy.

I'm sorry to call you out, but your not telling the full truth. I played the 360 version and it has to be one of the most technically flawed games I've played this generation. I made a thread about it, you should probably read it. 

Crysis 2 is a great game, but it will never be the best looking game. Anything with a framerate that plummets, pop in that appears at every turn, has a sub-HD resolution, ugly character models and ridiculous bugs, can't be the best looking game on consoles.

I had all these issues with the game and Digital Foundry and LOT can back up my claims with their own expert analysis. You may have had less trouble, but having none is impossible.

@Selnor. Your also grossly overestating how large the environments are, which usuaully flactuates between extremely linear and a small sanbox with a few different paths to reach the same objective. Crysis 2 isn't Far Cry 2, hell, it's not much more open than Halo: Reach.

Crysis 2 is still a great game and I wish it ran better, but after seven hours I had to just put it down, because a man can only take dumb AI, enemies getting stuck in buildings and game crashing bugs so many times before it drives them away. 

Actually i've had bare minimal problems with my Crysis 2 copy too (360 version) The framerate is for the most part pretty steady (with a few jerks here and there) and there is almost no pop in for me. And once in a while a enemy will glitch but thats it for me...its nowhere near as bad as I see so many people making it out to be.

Also just to clarify I have the game saved to my harddrive.



CGI-Quality said:
Kynes said:

This thread is a clear example of the worst thing we got this generation of consoles, and that's fanboys. Grow up.

You're usually a fair dude, but don't get lumped into anything by insulting people.


I can't be anything but a fair dude, I own a Wii :-p

 

OT: People should stop throwing things at other's faces, and they should play more games. It would be beneficial for everyone's mood.



AussieGecko said:
kowenicki said:


hi there big fella.  Why wouldnt I?

Still going on about this?  wow... quiet month at your house?

If lens of truth says its a graphics king then so be it...  have fun.


yeah its pretty funny when they think an xbox version looks better they are not to be trusted but a ps3 anything, OMG ITS FREAKING GOSPEL

when have i ever complained about LoT.

i take their word even if their analyis disagreees with my eyes



ZaneWane said:

OP and his Sony pals need to accept that media and anyone else with pair of working eyes has crowned Crysis 2 the best graphics on consoles and should just move on.


since when have we ever accepted the media? Crysis 2 is probably the best looking game on PC but on consoles how can we "crown" a game that has as many bad things about it as good things.