By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - New Battlefield 3 Gameplay. HD.

yo_john117 said:
vlad321 said:
yo_john117 said:

Wow that looks fantastic.

And guys there is nothing wrong with regenitive health...makes things more fun and accessable.


That is what I said too. It makes it accessible to all the scrubs and noobs at the cost making a good game for the people who actually know how to play. Who enjoy a game that is well made where it requires more than 2 neurons to go through. I have always found it laughable when someone labels a game with regenrative health as "hardcore."

The thing is most people prefer regenitive health (and I mean the vast majority) so why would a developer make a game with something that would annoy many many users to make it more fun for the 10 guys that want it?


Because regenerative health belongs on easy difficulty, why would you need a medic if you could just sit there for a few seconds?  They need to at least make it not default for ranked matches, or make sure your profile shows you play on easy bake oven mode instead of what real BF is supposed to be.



Around the Network
yo_john117 said:
vlad321 said:
yo_john117 said:

Wow that looks fantastic.

And guys there is nothing wrong with regenitive health...makes things more fun and accessable.


That is what I said too. It makes it accessible to all the scrubs and noobs at the cost making a good game for the people who actually know how to play. Who enjoy a game that is well made where it requires more than 2 neurons to go through. I have always found it laughable when someone labels a game with regenrative health as "hardcore."

The thing is most people prefer regenitive health (and I mean the vast majority) so why would a developer make a game with something that would annoy many many users to make it more fun for the 10 guys that want it?

Because it is a better game. The Hurt Locker is a much better movie than Twilight, and Twilight made tons more money. That doesn't mean that Twilight wasn't worth less than a bucket of shit.

Edit: Changed the example to something more recent.



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835

 

....my eyes!!

they ain't prepared to such much awesomeness..



 

Face the future.. Gamecenter ID: nikkom_nl (oh no he didn't!!) 

so it's Battlefield 3 then



pezus said:
youarebadatgames said:
yo_john117 said:
vlad321 said:
yo_john117 said:

Wow that looks fantastic.

And guys there is nothing wrong with regenitive health...makes things more fun and accessable.


That is what I said too. It makes it accessible to all the scrubs and noobs at the cost making a good game for the people who actually know how to play. Who enjoy a game that is well made where it requires more than 2 neurons to go through. I have always found it laughable when someone labels a game with regenrative health as "hardcore."

The thing is most people prefer regenitive health (and I mean the vast majority) so why would a developer make a game with something that would annoy many many users to make it more fun for the 10 guys that want it?


Because regenerative health belongs on easy difficulty, why would you need a medic if you could just sit there for a few seconds?  They need to at least make it not default for ranked matches, or make sure your profile shows you play on easy bake oven mode instead of what real BF is supposed to be.

Why would you need a medic if you could just go around a corner and pick up a medpack?

because the medic threw .....the....health...pack...maybe



Around the Network
ssj12 said:
vlad321 said:

Aw fucking hell. First no health bars and still with that scrub friendly regenerating health, and now with QTEs? Next thing I know there will be object highlighting.....


single player its all fine, multiplayer needs traditional health bars and melee knifing.

If I end up review this, and it has all this scrubby crap, I will not be friendly.

I feel sorry for anyone that thinks this will be a true battlefield 2 sequel , they already confirmed that there is NO commander, NON of the original classes (they're the sticking the 4 crap classes from BC2), and there won't be any mod support, put that with the re-gen health and this is looking more and more like something that's NOT Battlefield, meh I don't care, I come to accept the casualzation of EVERY single FPS this gen (thanks COD), at lesat BF2 will always be around...right?

but hey, it looks good, and I hope no I pray the gameplay works unlike BC2



Ignore my pic post fail.



http://soundcloud.com/cathode

PSN: Parasitic_Link

pezus said:
goforgold said:
pezus said:
youarebadatgames said:
yo_john117 said:
vlad321 said:
yo_john117 said:

Wow that looks fantastic.

And guys there is nothing wrong with regenitive health...makes things more fun and accessable.


That is what I said too. It makes it accessible to all the scrubs and noobs at the cost making a good game for the people who actually know how to play. Who enjoy a game that is well made where it requires more than 2 neurons to go through. I have always found it laughable when someone labels a game with regenrative health as "hardcore."

The thing is most people prefer regenitive health (and I mean the vast majority) so why would a developer make a game with something that would annoy many many users to make it more fun for the 10 guys that want it?


Because regenerative health belongs on easy difficulty, why would you need a medic if you could just sit there for a few seconds?  They need to at least make it not default for ranked matches, or make sure your profile shows you play on easy bake oven mode instead of what real BF is supposed to be.

Why would you need a medic if you could just go around a corner and pick up a medpack?

because the medic threw .....the....health...pack...maybe

In Single Player? hmm... 

 

Edit: Woot 1000th post!

because me and the other guy were TOTALLY talking about single player

oh and:



vlad321 said:
yo_john117 said:
vlad321 said:
yo_john117 said:

Wow that looks fantastic.

And guys there is nothing wrong with regenitive health...makes things more fun and accessable.


That is what I said too. It makes it accessible to all the scrubs and noobs at the cost making a good game for the people who actually know how to play. Who enjoy a game that is well made where it requires more than 2 neurons to go through. I have always found it laughable when someone labels a game with regenrative health as "hardcore."

The thing is most people prefer regenitive health (and I mean the vast majority) so why would a developer make a game with something that would annoy many many users to make it more fun for the 10 guys that want it?

Because it is a better game. The Hurt Locker is a much better movie than Twilight, and Twilight made tons more money. That doesn't mean that Twilight wasn't worth less than a bucket of shit.

Edit: Changed the example to something more recent.

You realize thats completely subjective right? 



yo_john117 said:
vlad321 said:

Because it is a better game. The Hurt Locker is a much better movie than Twilight, and Twilight made tons more money. That doesn't mean that Twilight wasn't worth less than a bucket of shit.

Edit: Changed the example to something more recent.

You realize thats completely subjective right? 

No, it really isn't. The same way you can have bad/good movies, bad/good books, bad/good songs, etc. you can have bad/good games.



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835