By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - What the "short battery life" proves for the 3DS

Higher capacity battery with a flip open or clip cover for easy battery changes would have made this a non-issue.

It's one of those reasons why the only people who complain about PSP battery life either:

A) Don't actually own one; just like to complain. 

B) Own one but haven't figured out that the little plastic cover on the back contains a battery that can be swapped out

C) Own one, have located the battery cover but are too stubborn to buy an extra battery yet insist they should be able to play for 10 hours straight on a single charge because portable gaming is "what I do."

The only reason why it's an issue with the 3DS is because quite frankly, battery power has never been an issue before with any of Nintendo's handhelds.

I'm sure some peripheral company will sell a higher cap battery and maybe even a replacement battery cover that doesn't need a screwdriver and four screws to remove. Actually had one of those for the GBA (used a thumbscrew to secure the cover) and it worked well.



Around the Network

@airas  yeah, because im pretty sure that game was on par with the Quakes, Duke Nukems, and dooms of those days. Nope they wasnt



oniyide said:

@airas  yeah, because im pretty sure that game was on par with the Quakes, Duke Nukems, and dooms of those days. Nope they wasnt


You said FPS games were nonexistent on old portables.

I showed an example of an FPS on the Game Boy.



I'm too old for this gaming shit.

^^^i wasnt talking a specific year, im talking the whole generation. Wolfenstein 3d was released a year later than MIDI (GB version) and i think its safe to say it was leagues ahead of that game. But kudos to them for even trying



@airas  ok, thats cool, thanks for the history lesson, but that game wasnt anything close to what the Wolfensteins and Dooms did eventually. Hell the GB version was probably a pretty poor point.



Around the Network

the battery isnt a issue for me, as long as the games i buy are good than i will be happy.  :)



GAMERTAG IS ANIMEHEAVEN X23

PSN ID IS : ANIMEREALM 

PROUD MEMBER OF THE RPG FAN CLUB THREAD

ALL-TIME FAVORITE JRPG IS : LOST ODYSSEY

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=52882&page=1

I am sure the battery life in comparison to a DS would seem poor but 3 to 5 hours seems a reasonable amount for continous.

 



W.L.B.B. Member, Portsmouth Branch.

(Welsh(Folk) Living Beyond Borders)

Winner of the 2010 VGC Holiday sales prediction thread with an Average 1.6% accuracy rating. I am indeed awesome.

Kinect as seen by PS3 owners ...if you can pick at it   ...post it ... Did I mention the 360 was black and Shinny? Keeping Sigs obscure since 2007, Passed by the Sig police 5July10.
NiKKoM said:

don't you people have girlfriends? I wished I could play 3 to 5 hours straight...  -_-"

But you are here all the time! How do you have time with that!



oniyide said:

@NYANKS  i have to respectfully disagree, those old portables are nothing like the new ones, we werent getting full length 3d GTA games, FPSs, 3d shooters, hell we werent even getting arcade perfect fighting games. Now we pretty much have all that and if the battery life suffers, so be it. For me at least i dont even play my consoles for more than 4 hours at a time. so 3-5 for a portable is good for me.

Something tells me you can have both, you just have to make concessions, and the companies aren't willing too.  A better battery could certainly have given better life.



RolStoppable said:

I wouldn't call three to five hours a long session, to me that's basically the warm-up phase before I seriously start to game.

wht he said