By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Ron Paul For President in 2008

rudyrsr8 said:
cdude1034 said:

I found this comment on Digg:

" Just make sure you know what he's after before you vote for him.
He wants to ban abortion, and he also wants to repeal the income tax. In other words, the rich get richer, and the poor will suffer. We will also have plenty of unwanted children being raised -- or not -- by resentful and indifferent mothers who were browbeaten into having them (just don't look to these guys to help support them, welfare queens!).
Just because it's unpleasant doesn't mean 'making it go away' will work.

Removing oversight in our corporatocracy is a bad idea too, bottom line.

If you want to vote for him, go to, but make sure you're actually informed and not just following others around; honesty is not a given in any medium today, most especially the internet."

 

The bottom line is, this guy is nucking futs.

Even though he doesn't outright say he wants to ban abortion, he does say he wants to delegate the decision to the states, which would then ban it outright, especially in the South. Taking away of Civil Rights is a bad thing guys :-

He wants to get rid of the Fed! You know, the people regulating our currency? Whatever. Luckily he's nothing more than a fad.

This guy has had to have spent LOADS on a viral campaign by now, judging by the insane amount of Ron Paul shit I've seen all over the streets and the internet. You know they're all posted by the same 4 guys...

Yes he's likable, and yes he may be a great guy, but his ideologies are absolutely ridiculous. I'd rather ote for Romney...If I was republican.

Abortion is wrong i just think someone does not have the right to kill someone else, just as the government does not have the right for capital punishment. Also life is more important than people think it is. A person is a person no matter how small. If you are old enough to have sex you should be old enough to be an adult and take care of a baby if not you shouldn't be fooling around. People need to take responsiblity for their own actions and not make others suffer for their mistakes. STOP SOCIALIZING THE RISKS, while not socializng the profits of its benifits. Anyways abortion is a states rights issue because there is no clause in the constitution about abortion and it is not good enough for the elsatic clause it is not justifiable that congress make such a law. Getting rid of the income tax does not make the poorer poorer it gives them more money, and giving more money to people raises their propesity to spend which allows more buniess to hire more people giving more people jobs. He wants to empower the individual to oversight the corporations not the government. Giving citzens more rights agaisnt corps. taking advantage of people. He doesnt want to get rid of the fed he wants the fed to be accountable for its actions and not swayed by big busniess interests.

 


the negative side of banning abortion wouldnt be much worse. There would be a massive increase in dumpster babies and home abortions. Thats the reason he will leave it in the states hands as it will allow people to realise that things could be much much worse. 



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453
 
Around the Network

Read the book "Freakonomics". Then you'll understand why abortions are not only a good thing, but necessary in society.

If parents don't have the means to take care of a baby, and they know it, but they have to raise it anyway, The child is more likely to suffer abuse and become a criminal/ outcast of society :-\

Of course it's not pure cause and effect here, there are many things that can cause the aforementioned situation, but there are strong correlations between unwanted kids and crime.



 

Currently playing: Civ 6

So to prevent crime we should kill babies.

There is something called adoption.



"Like you know"

rudyrsr8 said:
So to prevent crime we should kill babies.

There is something called adoption.

 How many have you adopted? Just wondering.



rudyrsr8 said:
So to prevent crime we should kill babies.

There is something called adoption.

 what about the cases where the parent was raped or will die if they give birth. Those are 2 damn good reasons for abortion.



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453
 
Around the Network
rudyrsr8 said:
So to prevent crime we should kill babies.

There is something called adoption.

Youve got to be kidding me.

You know how many kids need to be adopted, and those who do actually go to decent familys?

How many kids get worked through the system? And we all know how great the system is.

Abortion is not killing babies, specially since alot of the abortion could be used into research to save real kids.



                 With regard to Call of Duty 4 having an ultra short single player campaign, I guess it may well have been due to the size limitations of DVD on the XBox 360, one of various limitations multi-platform game designers will have to take into consideration-Mike B   

Proud supporter of all 3 console companys

Proud owner of 360wii and DS/psp              

Game trailers-Halo 3 only dissapointed the people who wanted to be dissapointed.

Bet with Harvey Birdman that Lost Odyssey will sell more then Blue dragon did.

How about we forget all this presidency bullshit and go to Canada?



Okay so killing is the solution, a justification is that they might end up with a bad life might do something bad. I say is it the child's fault? No so why do people want to dis own their child.



In terms of rape and health as in mother can die yes it should be allowed however with rape a pregnacy only occurs 1% of the time. Even so that baby is still yours. Im mostly against the getting rid of the baby bc they feel like it isnt their time to have a baby. It is irresponsible for a person to get rid of their child bc they arnt prepared. Then dont have sex. Im agaisnt the who abortion on demand and the fact tat the father has no rights. It is not the womans body it is another being inside. A culture of death is not a society i wish to live in.



"Like you know"

I cant change my mind or yours on this matter but i will leave it as that and i thank God that they didnt abort Jesus bc he was born before Mary was married and caused her to almost be stoned and was a real problem for her. So good night and God bless I will pray for you all tonight.



"Like you know"

rudyrsr8 said:
I cant change my mind or yours on this matter but i will leave it as that and i thank God that they didnt abort Jesus bc he was born before Mary was married and caused her to almost be stoned and was a real problem for her. So good night and God bless I will pray for you all tonight.

 maybe they didnt abort jesus because the chance of the kid being dead at birth was quite high? and the general fact that the idea didnt come to mind till the 20th century? 



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453