about the whether it's exclusive or not debate, think of it not so much as can you get the game on the ps3 as much as do you NEED a 360 to play the game. Yeah ps3 gamers cannot buy left 4 dead on ps3, but they don't have to get a 360 to play it, therefor not exclusive.
| Mr Puggsly said: I think its dumb that 360 games also on PC are removed. They are still games people enjoy on 360 and NOT PS3. Ultimately, this is a 360 vs PS3 thread. So why does PC matter? Ridiculous logic. |
No need to even debate it. The fact of the matter is that without "console exclusives", the 360 beat the PS3. Plain and simple. The PS3 got beaten, even by the OP's definition. If you tossed in games like Fable 3 and Gears 1, the 360 would have BURIED the PS3. It doesn't matter what anybody posts. The PS3 got beaten cleanly. If this were a boxing match, the PS3 would have been behind on points and the 360 would have a unanimous decision. People can bring whichever arguement about exclusives, bundles (no Kinect Adventures?) or a year headstart. At the end of the day (I can't stop posting this!) the PS3 was beaten.
The PS3 lost this comparison. The 360 won. Call it a shooterbox, bring in the actual overall selling top 10, talk about console diversity, the type of games the audience likes to play, whatever. The PS3 lost this thread. Just let it go. The PS3 lost because it was beaten. It was beaten so badly, it lost. There's no other way to look at it.
To summarize: The PS3 lost. It was beaten.
d21lewis said:
No need to even debate it. The fact of the matter is that without "console exclusives", the 360 beat the PS3. Plain and simple. The PS3 got beaten, even by the OP's definition. If you tossed in games like Fable 3 and Gears 1, the 360 would have BURIED the PS3. It doesn't matter what anybody posts. The PS3 got beaten cleanly. If this were a boxing match, the PS3 would have been behind on points and the 360 would have a unanimous decision. People can bring whichever arguement about exclusives, bundles (no Kinect Adventures?) or a year headstart. At the end of the day (I can't stop posting this!) the PS3 was beaten. The PS3 lost this comparison. The 360 won. Call it a shooterbox, bring in the actual overall selling top 10, talk about console diversity, the type of games the audience likes to play, whatever. The PS3 lost this thread. Just let it go. The PS3 lost because it was beaten. It was beaten so badly, it lost. There's no other way to look at it. To summarize: The PS3 lost. It was beaten. |
I lol'd. Like it was a competition lmao.
I'm sorry. I was trolling and I admit it. It's like the devil took over or something! PLEASE DON'T BAN ME!!
d21lewis said:
No need to even debate it. The fact of the matter is that without "console exclusives", the 360 beat the PS3. Plain and simple. The PS3 got beaten, even by the OP's definition. If you tossed in games like Fable 3 and Gears 1, the 360 would have BURIED the PS3. It doesn't matter what anybody posts. The PS3 got beaten cleanly. If this were a boxing match, the PS3 would have been behind on points and the 360 would have a unanimous decision. People can bring whichever arguement about exclusives, bundles (no Kinect Adventures?) or a year headstart. At the end of the day (I can't stop posting this!) the PS3 was beaten. The PS3 lost this comparison. The 360 won. Call it a shooterbox, bring in the actual overall selling top 10, talk about console diversity, the type of games the audience likes to play, whatever. The PS3 lost this thread. Just let it go. The PS3 lost because it was beaten. It was beaten so badly, it lost. There's no other way to look at it. To summarize: The PS3 lost. It was beaten. |
darthdevidem01 said: word up, son!
|
And now I made a baby cry! I'm sorry!! I was just tryin' to be funny! Now I feel bad. :(
CGI-Quality said:
I wasn't aiming at you in particular, but the aura of "battle" that threads always invite. I was really hoping the OP could be adjusted in a fashion that people would be satisfied, allowing the thread to be productive and reasonable, but alas not such luck. :/ |
Yeah, that's sorta what prompted my reply. I was more than happy to read the thread but the guy I quoted looked like he was being attacked in every direction (understandably, though). I just couldn't help but jump in!! That's the nature of these comparison threads--they bring out the evil fanboy hiding in all of us. My evil fanboy's name is Geronimo. He rides a motorcycle.
I was trolling, though. The only reason I posted that was to piss people off. That's usually not my style.
d21lewis said:
No need to even debate it. The fact of the matter is that without "console exclusives", the 360 beat the PS3. Plain and simple. The PS3 got beaten, even by the OP's definition. If you tossed in games like Fable 3 and Gears 1, the 360 would have BURIED the PS3. It doesn't matter what anybody posts. The PS3 got beaten cleanly. If this were a boxing match, the PS3 would have been behind on points and the 360 would have a unanimous decision. People can bring whichever arguement about exclusives, bundles (no Kinect Adventures?) or a year headstart. At the end of the day (I can't stop posting this!) the PS3 was beaten. The PS3 lost this comparison. The 360 won. Call it a shooterbox, bring in the actual overall selling top 10, talk about console diversity, the type of games the audience likes to play, whatever. The PS3 lost this thread. Just let it go. The PS3 lost because it was beaten. It was beaten so badly, it lost. There's no other way to look at it. To summarize: The PS3 lost. It was beaten. |
d21lewis, i am tired and you posted lots of words, im didnt quit catch it, who won?
you werent very clear :)
osamanobama said:
d21lewis, i am tired and you posted lots of words, im didnt quit catch it, who won? you werent very clear :) |
Just want to let you know that the PS3 did lose it's pretty clear about that. But you don't have to be a fanboy and write a whole article about it! If you want i can put the actual GT sales for both games and push Forza 2 and 3 to less that 2-2.5 million because that's actually how the game sold! and don't even talk about kinect adventures not being on the list because sports chamions would have sold over 7 million if it was bundled with every move controller! Because over 4.5 million controllers have been sold worldwide and around 2.5 million in bundles and actual sales!
Here are some actual sales for the games in the top 10! Pretty much all of them need adjustment!
http://www.polyphony.co.jp/english/list.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MotorStorm#Reception
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncharted_2:_Among_Thieves#Sales
mantlepiecek said:
There's no way xbox or gamecube could have made similar arguments because of the bolded "comparable userbase". Difference of 2.8 million - 4 million is not going to affect software sales that much. And PS3 does have big franchises as Halo, GT 5 and prologue both have sold relatively well. MGS4, God of War 3 and Uncharted 2 have also sold well, around 4 million that is awesome considering its been like a year since GoW and 1 1/2 since Uncharted 2? Apart from Gears and Halo 360 doesn't sell that many exclusives either, they are usually bundled like forza 2 and 3. Kinect sports did sell well though. Head start is one reason why 360 has more overall software sales and in turn more exclusive sales. By the time this gen ends I am sure Sony will have more comparable exclusive game sales. No one's making excuses, just stating facts. |
None of those games you mention has sold anywhere near what Halo 3 has sold, let alone Reach. Untill ps3 gets a 10 million seller it has no franchise as big as Halo.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
