By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
osamanobama on 15 March 2011
Edit Thread
d21lewis said:
Mr Puggsly said:

I think its dumb that 360 games also on PC are removed. They are still games people enjoy on 360 and NOT PS3.

Ultimately, this is a 360 vs PS3 thread. So why does PC matter? Ridiculous logic.

No need to even debate it.  The fact of the matter is that without "console exclusives", the 360 beat the PS3.  Plain and simple.  The PS3 got beaten, even by the OP's definition.  If you tossed in games like Fable 3 and Gears 1, the 360 would have BURIED the PS3.  It doesn't matter what anybody posts.  The PS3 got beaten cleanly.  If this were a boxing match, the PS3 would have been behind on points and the 360 would have a unanimous decision.  People can bring whichever arguement about exclusives, bundles (no Kinect Adventures?) or a year headstart.  At the end of the day (I can't stop posting this!) the PS3 was beaten. 

The PS3 lost this comparison.  The 360 won.  Call it a shooterbox, bring in the actual overall selling top 10, talk about console diversity, the type of games the audience likes to play, whatever.  The PS3 lost this thread.  Just let it go.  The PS3 lost because it was beaten.  It was beaten so badly, it lost.  There's no other way to look at it.

To summarize:  The PS3 lost.  It was beaten.

d21lewis, i am tired and you posted lots of words, im didnt quit catch it, who won?

you werent very clear :)