Votals: [3,L-5] darthdevidem01: Gnizmo, TruckOSaurus, theprof00
With 14 alive it takes 8 to lynch.
[1,L-7] NotStan: hatmoza
Votals: [3,L-5] darthdevidem01: Gnizmo, TruckOSaurus, theprof00
With 14 alive it takes 8 to lynch.
[1,L-7] NotStan: hatmoza
Hephaestos said: on 03/17/11 19:20 GMT 1 vetterman's last post (logged on but didnt post since).
in anycase if nothing transpires i guess i'll vote for one tomorow.. |
Vetteman gets busy with family stuff I believe. He also browses from his phone which makes posting damn near impossible as I can attest. My couple of 2 sentence posts took 5 minutes or more to actually show up. This has come up with him before is why I am saying. Besides he actually did participate in this thread for a while which is better than you can say for darth up to this point.
We're at a very tough situation here without vetteman and darth, if we have two mafia factions then I believe it's going to be a lot tougher to figure things out without them. Maybe one of them will slip up and we can get some more information. Notstan seems like a "noob", though he may be hiding something under that guise.
To all: Do you think Notstan is smarter than we know, and playing off the "noob" card to disguise himself?
19:44:34 | Skeezer | METAL GEAR ONLINE |
19:44:36 | Skeezer | FAILURE |
19:44:51 | ABadClown | You're right! |
19:44:55 | ABadClown | Hur hur hur |
19:45:01 | Skeezer | i meant |
19:45:04 | Skeezer | YOU ARE A FAILKURE |
19:45:08 | Skeezer | FAILURE* |
hatmoza said: blah, I said I was going to look back at who suggested a vigilante but I don't feel like browsing posts.
I'm assuming he was the first person to suggest the vigilante. Isn't it strange that he would post this a few posts after I said I was going to come after those who proposed the possibility of the vigilante? He's hiding behind the newb card. "If more experienced players say I'm wrong, I'm wrong!" And honestly I don't buy into this post. It looks like a scum trying to pre-justify himself before I went back to re-read the game. He also FoS'ed the same person I said I'd wager was scum. Kissing up? This post reeks of noobiness. You guys want a quick, successful lynch? Then Vote: NotStan |
Seriously? I've had FoS on darth on day one :/, he was lurking then and still is. It's really up to you to make up your mind.
"If more experienced players believe that Vigilante is highly unlikely"
That has the grain of truth in it, I haven't played Mafia since the time I have frequented TW forums, which was well over two years ago, and the game that I have played was much more simplified, just mafia, doctor, cop and town. What is played now is much more complicated than what I played for, so I might have as well started afresh. I've never played a game with vigilantes but read up on the roles and thought it was a likely scenario.
Disconnect and self destruct, one bullet a time.
It's not that 2 mafia factions is unlikely, but that there isn't really solid evidence to prove it (linkz said he colored them the same on purpose, and gniz' theory was based on there being role-alignment matchups.
It's really starting to look like people completely buy it. I have a problem whenever people completely buy something.
on another note, while I am still willing to lync darth, I'm also willing to lynch either ABC or notstan. On that merit, notstan has the most glaring infractions that I've seen thus far, so, I'll be changing my vote from darth.
Unvote darth
vote notstan
ABC I'm looking at mainly because earlier he made a couple posts about kil'jaeden, saying he created the lich king. When I told him that I had already claimed it, he was like, "oh well, I guess it's randomized then". It's like, "And how would you know that mister?! You shouldn't know my alignment!"
However, I've decided to vote notstan over ABC because (despite how ridiculous it is) I cannot believe that ABC would draw mafia twice in a row. (although he's a possible SK)
Votals: [2,L-6] darthdevidem01: Gnizmo, TruckOSaurus, (theprof00)
With 14 alive it takes 8 to lynch.
[2,L-6] NotStan: hatmoza, theprof00
Switch Code: SW-7377-9189-3397 -- Nintendo Network ID: theRepublic -- Steam ID: theRepublic
Now Playing
Switch - Super Mario Maker 2 (2019)
Switch - The Legend of Zelda: Link's Awakening (2019)
Switch - Bastion (2011/2018)
3DS - Star Fox 64 3D (2011)
3DS - Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney (Trilogy) (2005/2014)
Wii U - Darksiders: Warmastered Edition (2010/2017)
Mobile - The Simpson's Tapped Out and Yugioh Duel Links
PC - Deep Rock Galactic (2020)
theprof00 said: However, I've decided to vote notstan over ABC because (despite how ridiculous it is) I cannot believe that ABC would draw mafia twice in a row. (although he's a possible SK) |
ask trucks how he feels on people's chances of drawing mafia multiple times in a row ^^
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
Hephaestos said:
|
yeah i know. It's a real problem. I have to figure out a way to circumvent that kind of thinking because it's always interfering with my reasoning.
Sorry about not participating more, was busy. But i have been keeping up with the thread.
Im still getting a bed feeling from hatmoza, i think its another scheme of his, unfortunately its just a feeling and the only evidence I would have is from past games.
I do agree with theprof00 on both ABC and NotStan, i think they are both lynch worthy for a number of reasons.
Vote: NotStan
Wonktonodi said:
Although it gives the town some valuble information (that there is likely a role-blocker) it also means that all the scum factions know that you have that ability as well. So why would you rush that? It makes you very likely to be killed tonight when you very well could have waited a day or two and given us some more information. |
I don't really think I've rushed it, but if me or hat hadn't said anything, then I don't think we would have anything to discuss at all. I have no real desire to bs around. Just trying to play the game.