TruckOSaurus said:
A Watcher is someone who picks someone to watch at night and sees if someone "visited" that person. So say Final-Fan had picked to watch radish last night, he would have spotted whoever killed him (had he not died of course).
It's kinda the inverse of the Tracker role who picks someone to follow and knows what that person did at night.
|
explaining watcher to baal
TruckOSaurus said:
Now on to the aftermath of last night. It's been a while since we had two deaths in a night.
Two options have been brought forward by other players:
- Two Mafia factions: I'm not inclined to believe this one because of the size of the game and the fact that theRepublic has helped balanced this game (I'm pretty sure he would have objected to this) and also because I believe radish would have been labelled Mafia A or B in the OP. - Linkzmax puts all deaths in the same color: I'd put my money on this option. Whether because Linkz has never been in a multi-death game or because he simply decided not to gives us clues as to who killed who.
Going by this, hatmoza's bus driver theory is possible only if a SK/vigilante killed Final-Fan and whoever the Mafia targetted got switched with radish. The more likely event here is that everyone succeeded in killing who they wanted dead. This means radish's death was at the hands of either a vigilante or a serial killer.
In the case of a vigilante, it's kind of an irresponsible move to kill on the first night. It would have to be a new player or Wonk wanting to prove his theory from last game :P
That leaves the serial killer as the most probable option for radish's murder.
|
correctly identifies no busser, and single mafia team with an SK (yet to be proven, but I'm confident that trucks is in same mafia team as dsis and the others). Looks to wonk as a possible vig, but also notes that sk is more probable.
TruckOSaurus said:
Linkzmax said:
Two announcements:
1) Without giving any hints as to the setup of the game, I am intentionally witholding information by wording both kills as "murdered" and having them both red in the OP. It is up to everyone to figure out who/what killed whom and why.
2) I have yet to see this on VGC, so I may catch some flak for this. I'm allowing radish to continue posting to his scummate(s), including posts during the day. His scummate(s) still cannot talk during the day though. Obviously radish was not given a link to the dead quicktopic.(Where people go to continue "playing" on the sidelines)
|
Thank you for this precision.
Now, the Mafia A and B theory seems a bit more possible.
About #2, I'm not liking it very much. One of the strengths of the Mafia is that they benefit from many points of view to make their decision and guide their actions. Apart from the obvious benefits of having a Mafia dead, another reward for the town was that the Mafia had one less mind to plan their evil schemes.
|
probably a very honest answer.
TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:
editted text back into this ghost post;
I believe radish slipped when he mentioned THE sibling. Every time he mentioned A sibling, he said THE sibling.
"Are you THE sibling"- "I'm not THE other sibling"
I'm surprised I missed this. In the off chance that there actually IS a sibling in the mafia, I first of all doubt that the townie version would know his sibling, but that the mafia would know the townie. So, I am going to go back and look at people radish defended, as well as other players that were defended. (But mainly radish in particular since I know he's mafia)
And yes, this does imply that I'm willing to lynch a sibling townie.
|
I'm not sure what you're implying here. Correct me if I'm wrong:
You're saying that the Mafia had a chance to exchange their names/roles at the beginning of Day One (which has been common recently), that someone other than radish said "I'm a Sibling, my brother is X" and then radish slipped by using sentences that implied he knew someone in the town was a sibling. And now you want the sibling to sacrifice himself so we can kill the Mafia member by killing his brother?
|
After this post, i posted that trucks was trying to make my theory seem crazy. I still think so.
TruckOSaurus said:
Here's someone who could counter Gnizmo's "name equals alignment" theory. Wonk admitted to being Archimonde yesterday and like Metal_Gear said that's a very evil person!
|
Implying wonk is town?
TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:
Yes, that is what I am saying, which was followed by "in the off chance that it's true".
I appreciate that your wording makes my idea seem volatile, but it's pretty simple.
1. They knew each other's roles (which is pretty common) 2. Possibly knew who the town sibling was 3. There IS a sibling pair 4. a mislynch is worth a dead mafia
It's not that crazy.
However, I'm not asking the sibling to sacrifice himself. I don't think a town sibling SHOULD know who their counterpart is and they shouldn't even know that they themselves are a sibling because that's gimping the mafia. It doesn't make sense to me because if I knew I was a sibling I'd sac myself on day one.
|
I wasn't judging your idea but there was lots of blanks to fill in to get the essence of what your were proposing. I wanted to make sure I filled them correctly.
The good/bad sibling pair is pretty frequent but a good/good pair is also possible. With this in mind a townie sibling can't automatically assume his brother is evil which means him knowing his brother's name doesn't gimp the Mafia.
Also, I'm pretty sure siblings always know who their brother/sister is. Can someone back me up on this? My recollection might be tainted by the fact that I wouldn't personally consider adding siblings who don't know each other in a game I'm modding.
|
countering my idea. It's a credible counter.
TruckOSaurus said:
NotStan said:
Damn that is one big discussion, although the idea of linking character/their aligment to their role in the game is interesting, I personally don't know what to make of it. An interesting theory but could be flawed in a sense that those names used could just be assigned randomly. As I said going by Gnizmo's theory, vetteman seems like a likely target,
FoS Vetteman94
|
Did I miss something? I never saw Gnizmo saying Vetteman was a likely target, he's been pretty focused on Darth since the beginning of the day.
|
parenting
TruckOSaurus said:
Gnizmo said:
Not entirely, but I am willing to back off for now. Not enough people have come out in support of it. I am still in favor of lynching Darth as a lurker which would without question prove or disprove my theory. If more people want to come out saying its a good one then I am willing to pursue it to the end though. Of course I am the paranoid sort who fears people lying to me.
|
At this point, I think there's too many people saying alignments don't match to go along with your theory. That being said, I wouldn't mind lynching Darth for his lurker status and the arkwark timing of his roleclaim. He could have very well made it because he figured we'd think a Mafia wouldn't dare make such a claim.
|
countering gnizmo's theory (despite it being sort of right, as eventually shown)
WIFOM on darth.
TruckOSaurus said:
On the contrary it does match but I'm having problems believing 3 or 4 Mafia players would have come forward and said "I don't match" when they knew they'd fall under suspicion of the town. Especially considering most nameclaims were done after you exposed your theory of matched alignments.
|
trucks says his name and alignment match, counters gniz again.
TruckOSaurus said:
A Bad Clown said:
The main flaw I see though in the theory is that is vetteman is possibly a traitor, then someone would have to recruit him. In World of Warcraft did any character turn the athur evil?
|
If I remember correctly, he turns evil by himself after picking up Frostmorne (a sword).
|
Assisting ABC in figuring something out. Says vetteman's character becomes evil. (I believe in some games, there is a role that has to kill once in order to become bad, but I could be wrong.) Unsure what this could mean.
TruckOSaurus said:
Guess we got caught in the debate about names, we're not really good at multi-tasking it seems.
About your first link, he does contradict himself. Although I think "Look at it this way. I push a lynch on you people start suspecting me [...]" could be interpreted as "Let's suppose I push a lynch on you..." meaning this whole sentence was just theory.
|
Gives me the exact same excuse that dsis will eventually use.
TruckOSaurus said:
Well the townie wouldn't be told he's a sibling with a Mafia. The role PMs would look like that:
Player A : You're a Mafia Sibling, your brother is Player B. If he dies, you die.
Player B: You're a Sibling, your brother is Player A. If he dies, you die.
|
explaining siblings
TruckOSaurus said:
That was my point earlier but I checked the Mafia Wiki and it seems what I had in mind fits the Lovers variation better than Siblings.
From the Mafia Wiki
Siblings are roles that know each each other's alignment, and die when any of the other siblings die. The classic Siblings roles are a Goon and a Cop who know each other, with the condition that if one dies, the other commits suicide the following night - however, the roles could be any town/mafia pair.
Variations
The Siblings do not know each other's alignments (in this case they are called Lovers).
|
I wouldn't rule out the possibility of siblings having the same conditions as Lovers since they are very similar roles.
|
corrects himself
TruckOSaurus said:
Baalzamon said:
TruckOSaurus said:
MetalGear_94 said:
TruckOSaurus said:
radishhead said:
"I was getting bored" suggests that he'd be less bored if the game moved onto night 1?
|
Well there was a 7 hour gap between Heph's post (4:24 EST) and Gnizmo's post (11:27 EST) I'm guessing Metal_Gear's boredom comes from this lack of activity. Seems he was itching to post but needed someone to initate the day's conversation. Not too sure what this means though.
|
Exactly.
All I have is this thread to keep me occupied during march break.
|
So this means you could have upgraded your FoS to a vote without having to wait for Gnizmo to voice his suspicions of him?
|
For some reason this post seems to irk me into being suspicious of TruckOSaurus...radishhead seemed to be trying to lure others into thinking metalgear was somebody with a role that is more exciting during the night (such as mafia), and then truck popped in, with a first comment that seemed to contradict radishhead, and then going after metalgear.
I could be totally wrong, but this post is yelling that truck and radish were trying to work together on this one, and radish just happened to wind up being a mafia member.
FoS: TruckOSaurus
|
I was trying to see Metal_Gear's motivation behind a quick vote. His behavior was scummy and questions needed to be asked about it. Also, from what I've observed in the last few games, scum loves to accuse each other of the first day so radish trying to insinuate that Metal_Gear was Mafia doesn't automatically make Metal_Gear town now that radish has showed up scum.
|
Baal confirms my assessment of the post, and trucks rebuts.
TruckOSaurus said:
hatmoza said:
Wrong. Whoever killed Final-Fan did not do it intentionally. Radish's killer successfully targeted Radish. In this case it was either the opposing mafia faction or the SK. However, in F-F's case, he was not the initial target, nor was he meant to be targeted and killed. He was bussed by the person who was supposed to get killed.
The busser knows this, and the killer knows this.
|
Which one are you?
|
not much here.
TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:
there's a role, I forget what it is atm, but it's basically a watcher, but instead of watching WHO goes to what person, he sees WHAT happened to that person.
So, say I target FF, I would know, "Night-killed" "bussed" "roleblocked"
Now, to add on to the series of events, according to the fluff (flavor) FF's arms were BOUND. That could be a roleblock. So, I'm starting to think that this series of events IS exactly what happened.
However, this would also require that Hat was targeted by 3 players. Night-killed, roleblocked, bussed, oh and tracked. 4 players would have to target Hat. That's quite a substantial number.
It would also have to ignore that FF was wearing his goggles.
|
Catching up with the thread here so I don't know if this was addressed already but the role you're looking for is Watcher and that's precisely what Final-Fan was. I can't imagine there being two watchers.
|
misunderstanding. The role I was looking for was voyeur.
TruckOSaurus said:
Okay let me get this straight... I'm going to assume everyone who revealed information is telling the truth for the time being to see if we can get a plausible scenario.
- hatmoza protects Final-Fan but he dies anyway.
- outlaw tracks hatmoza who said he went out but outlaw gets a "Stayed at home" result
This indeed points to a busser who switched hatmoza and Final-Fan last night.
Problem #1: Why switch two high profile players together? If the intention of the bus driver was to protect hatmoza why not switch him out with a lurker? (I wanna state that I really really don't want to consider the possibility of a Mafia Bus Driver since it was established this was a broken role)
Problem #2: outlaw received a "Stayed at home" result, if we assume the above switch, it would mean Final-Fan did not watch anyone last night which is highly unlikely. I guess Final-Fan being role-blocked could possibly explain this since a blocked person would "stay home".
So all in all nothing is impossible and both hatmoza's and outlaw's version can be true at the same time but this also means we're dealing with lots of town power roles which in return means a strong Mafia.
|
summing up a post. Most of these things were already said at this point.
TruckOSaurus said:
Hephaestos said:
HoS Hat
your roleclaim made you shift from possible mafia killer to Vanilla townie that will never be night killed.... the most convenient of covers. Even a cop investigation of you sounds useless as you're in the perfect cover for a godfather (and goon sugests there is one).
-> can't be killed
-> can't be investigated
-> easy to say you protected the wrong person for the rest of the game... on average docs get less than 1 right call and that would have been FF for you.
This town has no option than to lynch you on Lylo, congratz, you repeated linkz stunt of last game.... and he was mafia, are you?
I just wanted to point this out for every townie to sink it into their mind should they survive to the last day (lylo is last lynch before losing... so if you misslynch, you lose... and that's the time where you want to lynch the "unconfirmable" characters that claimed something making them out of reach ( such as a miller or in this case, a townie that can't be night killed).
|
This is distrubing, I agree with your conclusion that hatmoza could be scum covering all bases with his roleclaim (he does seem to be a very powerful version of a bodyguard). Frankly, I don't know what to do about it. Lynching him because of this possibility runs the risk of us loosing a great asset (both in the player and the role) but now that you've put it out there that he should be lynched at Lylo, a remaining scum could use him as a shield to secure a victory.
|
Another, I don't know what to do about this while at the same time suggesting that hat is a liability. He did the same thing with metal gear and radish, like the post quoted a couple quotes above where radish pointed something out, trucks tried to squash it, and then implied that mg is very suspicious.
TruckOSaurus said:
Unless the mod is unusually cruel, he will reveal all role info when someone dies.
|
answering a question
TruckOSaurus said:
Baalzamon said:
Don't tell me I'm not reading the thread just because I see certain things as taking different paths than what you see.
hatmoza said he was supposedly a bodyguard, in which case, considering we have since realized it is possible he was role blocked without a PM, how can he be so certain that ff was bussed. Also, if hatmoza was role blocked, then would it not make since that outlaw could say hatmoza didn't do anything, as he didn't because he was roleblocked.
|
He WAS certain of it BEFORE he realized he was blocked. He doesn't believe it anymore.
|
countering baal. Possible parenting.
TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:
In order of appearance:
DAY 1:
Name (C/NC/?/M/Slip)
wonk 13-19-0-0-0 radish 3-11-1-4-0 MG 8-37-1-0-0 notstan 1-27-0-0-0 vette 5-1-1-1-0 dsis 11-20-0-2-0 hat 7-9-0-1-0 ABC 8-26-0-4-0 Baal 1-6-1-12-0 prof 6-4-0-0-0 ff 4-9-0-0-0 truck 10-7-0-0-0 Heph 10-16-0-3-0 Gnizmo 4-1-1-0-0 outlaw 0-0-0-0-0-0 darth 2-3-0-1-0
Outlaw got a 0 because I don't count, "Hi, I'm here" posts as posts. That would be unfair.
Trophies: MOST POSTS: MetalGear: 46 posts ABC: 38 Dsis: 33
MOST CONTENT: wonk: 13 dsis: 11 truck&heph: 10 each
MOST NON-CONTENT: MG: 37 Notstan: 27 ABC: 26
MOST MISTAKES: Baal: 12 Radish&ABC: 4 Heph: 3
BEST RATIO: Gnizmo: 66% Vette: 62.5% Theprof00: 60% Truck: 58% nothing else over 50%
WORST RATIO: Notstan: 3.7% Baal: 5% MG: 17.4% Radish: 18.75% nothing else under 20% (ABC was the next closest at 21%)
|
That was one big post. I'll comment on the stats and come back to the noted posts later as needed.
NotStan and Baal are new players, which kinda forgives the lower ratio of content in their posts (to a certain extent). NotStan didn't make much of an impression on me so he's neutral to me right now but Baal did strike me as the perfect case of the paranoid townie new player on Day One.
I'm surprised by the amount of NC posts by Metal_Gear, did you count his posts when he was questionned about his quick vote as non-content? Also surprised at MG being the one with the most posts, history would indicate he's not scum since he lurks a lot when scum but then again he could be scum that has learned from his mistake.
|
says notstan is neutral, and defends baal. However, he specifically looks at MGs posts, saying MG is most suspicious. Does the thing he does again where he first defends a player and then implies suspicion on them. Keep in mind he has not done this tactic with ANY of the flipped mafia. This could be his tell.
TruckOSaurus said:
Hephaestos said:
sure... but Hat IS the type of player that can pull a trick like this... especially with his history of early role claims as town.
|
I know he is, which is why I'm so torn about him. As described by hatmoza, his role seems too powerful which leads me to believe it could be a fabrication but then again hatmoza could have embelished some parts of his powers to ward off scum.
|
defends hatmoza. Trying to buddy himself before the nightkill so as to avoid "revenge-suspicion"?
TruckOSaurus said:
Linkzmax said:
Votals:
[1,L-7] darthdevidem01: Gnizmo With 14 alive it takes 8 to lynch.
I have no plans to modkill anyone for lurking if people are waiting for that. I will modpoke or try to replace if necessary, but there isn't a general lack of activity from everyone which warrants a blanket rule.
|
Well that seals it for me. Vote: darthdevidem01
|
first vote, lands on a townie. In fact, this is his first anything. His only other FoS was a "joke".
TruckOSaurus said:
My vote is mostly because of his lurker status but also because of how he roleclaimed out of the blue at the start of the day. If he's just a townie not participating, my vote will put some additional pressure on him to get on with the posting!
|
explains his vote
TruckOSaurus said:
Wonktonodi said:
I have some questions.
1. Outlaw why did you find in necisary to roleclaim this early?
For everyone else what are your thoughts on the early roleclaim
2. What is a reasonable amount of time to wait for those that are currently lurking?
3. What are your thoughts on the current make out of the game based on deaths role claims and implied roles? I don't want this one to get too drawn out though.
4. Do you feel as I feel that metal gear is being an active lurker?
|
Guess I'll start by answering those questions.
1. I'm not against early roleclaims per say but you have to have a valid reason behind it. outlawauron had information about hatmoza (but I still question if that was enough to warrant the claim), darth had no reason whatsoever to roleclaim, hatmoza had to roleclaim because of the mess of suppositions we were heading into.
2. I guess something like 24-36h much less if they post in other threads like crazy.
3. I don't know what to make up of all this except that we shouldn't close our minds to any options unless they have been proven to be impossible.
4. When prof posted his potals, I was truely surprised that Metal_Gear was the top poster. That tells me that a lot of his posts didn't have an impact on me so yes there's a part of active lurking in MG's behavior. What troubles me the most though is that since comments have been made on the lack of content of his posts MG has gone into silent mode. I'm not prepared to vote for him based of that yet but my suspicion of him has risen a lot.
|
I just took another look at this post and I noticed this response
Q:3. What are your thoughts on the current make out of the game based on deaths role claims and implied roles? I don't want this one to get too drawn out though.
"I don't know what to make up of all this except that we shouldn't close our minds to any options unless they have been proven to be impossible."
"I don't know what to make up of all this"
"I don't know what to make up"
Feels like a possible slip.
TruckOSaurus said:
Interesting turn of events about NotStan here. As I said before, I was pretty neutral on him but he did seem to put out the "I'm a newb" card a bit much and now since people have started voting for him he pulled out every scum trick in the bag: No Lynch vote, revenge vote on hatmoza, refusal to roleclaim saying he's important.
Now, he's finally roleclaimed Roleblocker which is quite plausible with what we know as of now but it doesn't fit at all with his vote on hatmoza. I think NotStan was one of the few who got really riled up about hatmoza's "Thank God, I'm a townie" so him roleblocking hat is logical but with how Day Two played out if he's really the roleblocker he should be thinking "hatmoza is telling the truth".
Also, someone already corrected NotStan on the "invincibility" of the Elite Bodyguard but I'd like to add that if hatmoza does have this role, him roleclaiming was a really smart move because it scares scum shitless. From now on they'll be afraid to kill who they really want dead for fear of dying themselves.
|
point of no return for notstan, truck finally calls out notstan.
TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:
See, I'm used to seeing a mafia roleblocker though.
It's a tough decision. On one hand, I have a person claiming roleblocker, a role that is normally antagonistic, and on the other hand, I have a player who is pretty much a bomb. Both are good choices for a lynch because either or both could be lying. I need to see what notstan says about his role first.
Is he a roleblocker, or was it just for one night. His language makes it look like it was a one-shot ability. Either way, I'm not sure what I should do, and I'll most-likely remove my vote no matter what, but I'd like for everything to be clean and clear before I do anything.
|
I don't know why when I think Roleblocker, I always think town first although the role is much more appropriate for Mafia. As town, a Roleblocker is like a weak cop (block X if there's one less death X must be scum) but a blocker with bad aim can be pretty harmful to the town.
As you said, before we go ahead with voting/unvoting, I think we need to hear NotStan's clarifications.
|
undermines my theory, says, "let's give notstan a chance".
TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:
I used to think that roleblocker should be pro-town, but imo, roleblocker only really makes sense as a mafia, because otherwise, town has too many chances to block a kill, and with this setup, where we can see hat as a guardian (bodyguard), we know there is at least 2 chances to block a kill, and if there is a doctor (are there ever games without one), then there would be three chances. With 14 people, and two kills, that's nearly a 50% chance to prevent a kill if a roleblocker exists. (Also, hat could be lying, skewing these results. Also, it's possible that instead of a doc there could be a faith healer, which is 50% chance to doc, AND Hat could be lying, etc etc)
There's too many variables to think about without his full explanation, but anything is possible. I'd be more inclined to believe a one-shot roleblock than a town roleblocker.
|
The only reason I'd be willing to believe so many "protective" roles right now would be because we've got ourselves two killing factions. It is possible we don't have a doctor, there wasn't any in the game where Stefl was the half-cop (hatmoza's game if my memory's good). Luckily the fear of a doctor kept Stefl alive until very late.
Also, if everyone's telling the truth, we've got ourselves a very powerful town (tracker, watcher, body guard, roleblocker, possible doc and cop), this makes me dread what the Mafia (or Mafias) have to compensate for this.
|
rebuttal
TruckOSaurus said:
Wonktonodi said:
theprof00 said:
well guys, honestly I'd rather MG than darth, but seeing as darth is more of a lurker, well...
|
I agree with you although just a thought. You have trouble thinking of ABC getting scum twice in a row this would make 3 for metal gear.
|
Don't mess with prof's head!
Frankly, I wouldn't mind voting for Metal_Gear at this point too. We have his quick vote on ABC yesterday and his sudden disappearance once his posting has come under question. Although from the lurker angle, between MG and darth, MG is the one who's most likely to come back to us.
|
Seems eager to get me to pursue metalgear.
TruckOSaurus said:
Baalzamon said:
Wonktonodi said:
Metal gear has been on the site much more recent than darth and has just stoped posting while darth hasn't been on the site at all in two days.
|
I know that, but I also thought one of metalgears first posts of the day was rather strange. Radish was dead, and proven to be mafia, and metalgear immediately found it necessary to clear any and all relationships he had with radish (which were slim). If I recall, he was the only one who thought it necessary to do this, but why was it so important to him to get unassociated with radish, when other people had conversed with him as well?
|
That's a very good point actually, Heph noted it here
Hephaestos said:
oh and HoS MG
notably for analysing only Radish's death (and something else that i might use later)
and for the little Bussdriver discution with hat (FoS Hat, though dependent on MG)
|
Maybe MG analyzed only radish's death because he knew full well what had happened to Final-Fan and also, like Baal says, because he wanted to disassociate himself from radish.
|
fomenting votes in MGs direction, both from Heph and Baal and in the post previously, myself.
TruckOSaurus said:
@Heph: What was the something you talked about when you said "and something else that i might use later" ?
|
I would like to know this as well.
TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:
also, can someone let me know how many posts darth has made during day 2?
|
I think his roleclaim is the only post for Day Two
|
answers a question
TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:
shucks, ninja'd.
Like I said, I'm considering the possibility of a silencer/dentist with a slight variation that a player is allowed to make one post.
|
Wouldn't he have mentionned in that one post that he was silenced or is it forbidden? One way or another I highly doubt that's what we have here.
|
my ridiculous post was countered by truck. Hey, it could've been true. dsis, trucks, and heph are the only ones that countered my idea. Hat enforced it with an HoS, while the others tried to get me to see that darth was lurking.
TruckOSaurus said:
With him not posting anywhere else on the site, I'd wager it's not the case but since right now Metal_Gear is just as suspicious as darth to me, I'd be willing give darth a chance and switch my vote to MG.
|
Ready to switch vote to mg on my say.
TruckOSaurus said:
MetalGear_94 said:
Wonktonodi said:
Better do a good job with this since some of the accusations against you are in there.
How is that at all insight into what is going on in the game?
It's not that you have a high post count that is the problem. It is the lack of posts of quality and your complete drop off after being called out for that.
|
What else can I say, but this is how I play the game =/
my post count isn't the only thing similar in those games, im playing like how used to play before and this has been the only time I've been called out for active lurking.
and I kinda got a little pissed off that people think im active lurking when I am actually trying play the damn game and it really put me off from playing for a while.
|
Getting this kind of call out is never pleasant. I remember dsister telling me I brought nothing new to the discussion and that I only mirrored Final-Fan's opinions during one game, I was pissed and understand why you would be put off too but disappearing for a couple of days isn't the best way to wash away those kind of accusations.
If you're really pro-town just keep on digging to find scum, point out things you think might be a tell, question people.
Speaking of questionning people, I have one for you... you came under fire for your quick ABC vote on Day One, what's your stance on him now?
|
looks like buddying with mg. Possible parenting.
TruckOSaurus said:
NotStan said:
Oh snap. I wrote out a long ass post but Opera ended up crashing on me so I lost the progress that I had *Shakes fist at the Shockwave plugin*, unfortunately as I am heading off to bed I can't another long-ass post, will try to repost it either during the day tomorrow or during the evening, depends when I get home.
|
I don't know what your long ass post contained but here's what I would want you to address:
With the notion that you knew you had blocked hatmoza, what was going through your head as hatmoza started making his claims about the presence of a bus driver and all the theories that followed? Why did you still vote for him when your block explains perfectly the chain of events of the day?
|
parenting. Important to note that he never brought this point up until everyone else did.
TruckOSaurus said:
How exactly is claiming Elite Bodyguard scaring the townies? (I have my theory on that but I'll let you answer for yourself before I mention it.)
|
counters notstan
TruckOSaurus said:
I wouldn't put all my hopes in the intervention of a cop since the combinaison of tracker and watcher could very well be in play to replace the cop.
|
not much to see here.
TruckOSaurus said:
Yes he could be lying his ass off but the beautiful thing here is that we can afford to wait it out a bit since he has some chances to prove himself (by defending someone successfully). So right now we have no reason to remove hatmoza from the equation because the benefits to the town outweigh the risks. As the game goes on, we'll re-evaluate the threath he poses.
|
promises that they will reevaluate Hat. Again, defend first, accuse second tactic.
TruckOSaurus said:
I'd be ready to hammer... you guys think I should wait for Wonk?
|
wants to hammer
TruckOSaurus said:
Wonktonodi said:
I'm caught up and I'll do it.
Unvote
Vote: notstan
|
Not fair! :P
Now we wait for Linkzmax and we'll know if we were right.
|
Really wanted to hammer.
TruckOSaurus said:
A Bad Clown said:
TruckOSaurus said:
If he does turn up town, my first step will be a HoS (or a vote) on you for this comment.
|
I'm implying if Notstan is town, and anoter town person comes up dead by morning, who would you suspect? I'd go straight to the person who tried to lynch train him.
|
Nothing is ever that simple. Everyone will have to answer for their previous actions and right now you're looking more and more like you're setting up the next mislynch.
|
not sure. Possibly setting up abc?
TruckOSaurus said:
Wonktonodi said:
TruckOSaurus said:
Not fair! :P
Now we wait for Linkzmax and we'll know if we were right.
|
Yeah I was tempted to say you may have the honor while at the same time I've yet to hammer anyone in these games. Unless I'm horribly mistaken.
|
Well we can't all be radishhead, he really mastered the art of hammering!
|
unsure.
End of day 2.