By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Vetteman94 said:
A Bad Clown said:

Guys, that flavor may be on to something. According to the WoW wiki Jaina Proudmore was once in love with Arthus.

Jaina was one of the most talented and trusted sorceresses of the Kirin Tor. She was dispatched by Antonidas to discover what was happening in the northlands of Lordaeron. She was escorted by her childhood friend and one-time romantic interest, Prince Arthas Menethil, to uncover if the plague had magical origins. Jaina saw the fall of Lordaeron firsthand and — guided by a mysterious prophet — rallied what survivors she could and fled across the sea to Kalimdor.

Look at this picture: 

Linkz said "Only Gnizmo would notice this", being that Gnizmo is a WoW fan and would have known about the romance and the sword. The only results for WoW Swords with animals I could find linked to this sword. Any thoughts on this?

That looks like a skull

The clue was animal painting, also I found this:

"The group were not willing to tolerate this behavior, so they moved closer until one of them shook the cosplayer. That's when his head rolled off his neck and landed on the ground with a muted thud."

RAdish's head was chopped off, and gniz wound up stabbed. I've looked up every character and so far only the sword is the only possible that can be mistaken for a "painted animal".



19:44:34 Skeezer METAL GEAR ONLINE
19:44:36 Skeezer FAILURE
19:44:51 ABadClown You're right!
19:44:55 ABadClown Hur hur hur
19:45:01 Skeezer i meant
19:45:04 Skeezer YOU ARE A FAILKURE
19:45:08 Skeezer FAILURE*
Around the Network
TruckOSaurus said:

A Watcher is someone who picks someone to watch at night and sees if someone "visited" that person. So say Final-Fan had picked to watch radish last night, he would have spotted whoever killed him (had he not died of course).

It's kinda the inverse of the Tracker role who picks someone to follow and knows what that person did at night.

explaining watcher to baal

TruckOSaurus said:

Now on to the aftermath of last night. It's been a while since we had two deaths in a night.

Two options have been brought forward by other players:

- Two Mafia factions: I'm not inclined to believe this one because of the size of the game and the fact that theRepublic has helped balanced this game (I'm pretty sure he would have objected to this) and also because I believe radish would have been labelled Mafia A or B in the OP.
- Linkzmax puts all deaths in the same color: I'd put my money on this option. Whether because Linkz has never been in a multi-death game or because he simply decided not to gives us clues as to who killed who.

Going by this, hatmoza's bus driver theory is possible only if a SK/vigilante killed Final-Fan and whoever the Mafia targetted got switched with radish. The more likely event here is that everyone succeeded in killing who they wanted dead. This means radish's death was at the hands of either a vigilante or a serial killer.

In the case of a vigilante, it's kind of an irresponsible move to kill on the first night. It would have to be a new player or Wonk wanting to prove his theory from last game :P

That leaves the serial killer as the most probable option for radish's murder.

correctly identifies no busser, and single mafia team with an SK (yet to be proven, but I'm confident that trucks is in same mafia team as dsis and the others). Looks to wonk as a possible vig, but also notes that sk is more probable.

TruckOSaurus said:
Linkzmax said:

Two announcements:

1) Without giving any hints as to the setup of the game, I am intentionally witholding information by wording both kills as "murdered" and having them both red in the OP. It is up to everyone to figure out who/what killed whom and why.

2) I have yet to see this on VGC, so I may catch some flak for this. I'm allowing radish to continue posting to his scummate(s), including posts during the day. His scummate(s) still cannot talk during the day though. Obviously radish was not given a link to the dead quicktopic.(Where people go to continue "playing" on the sidelines)

Thank you for this precision.

Now, the Mafia A and B theory seems a bit more possible.

About #2, I'm not liking it very much. One of the strengths of the Mafia is that they benefit from many points of view to make their decision and guide their actions. Apart from the obvious benefits of having a Mafia dead, another reward for the town was that the Mafia had one less mind to plan their evil schemes.

probably a very honest answer.

TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:

editted text back into this ghost post;

I believe radish slipped when he mentioned THE sibling. Every time he mentioned A sibling, he said THE sibling.

"Are you THE sibling"- "I'm not THE other sibling"

I'm surprised I missed this. In the off chance that there actually IS a sibling in the mafia, I first of all doubt that the townie version would know his sibling, but that the mafia would know the townie. So, I am going to go back and look at people radish defended, as well as other players that were defended. (But mainly radish in particular since I know he's mafia)

And yes, this does imply that I'm willing to lynch a sibling townie.

I'm not sure what you're implying here. Correct me if I'm wrong:

You're saying that the Mafia had a chance to exchange their names/roles at the beginning of Day One (which has been common recently), that someone other than radish said "I'm a Sibling, my brother is X" and then radish slipped by using sentences that implied he knew someone in the town was a sibling. And now you want the sibling to sacrifice himself so we can kill the Mafia member by killing his brother?

After this post, i posted that trucks was trying to make my theory seem crazy. I still think so.

TruckOSaurus said:

Here's someone who could counter Gnizmo's "name equals alignment" theory. Wonk admitted to being Archimonde yesterday and like Metal_Gear said that's a very evil person!

Implying wonk is town?

TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:

Yes, that is what I am saying, which was followed by "in the off chance that it's true".

I appreciate that your wording makes my idea seem volatile, but it's pretty simple. 

1. They knew each other's roles (which is pretty common)
2. Possibly knew who the town sibling was
3. There IS a sibling pair
4. a mislynch is worth a dead mafia

It's not that crazy.

However, I'm not asking the sibling to sacrifice himself. I don't think a town sibling SHOULD know who their counterpart is and they shouldn't even know that they themselves are a sibling because that's gimping the mafia. It doesn't make sense to me because if I knew I was a sibling I'd sac myself on day one.

I wasn't judging your idea but there was lots of blanks to fill in to get the essence of what your were proposing. I wanted to make sure I filled them correctly.

The good/bad sibling pair is pretty frequent but a good/good pair is also possible. With this in mind a townie sibling can't automatically assume his brother is evil which means him knowing his brother's name doesn't gimp the Mafia.

Also, I'm pretty sure siblings always know who their brother/sister is. Can someone back me up on this? My recollection might be tainted by the fact that I wouldn't personally consider adding siblings who don't know each other in a game I'm modding.

countering my idea. It's a credible counter.

TruckOSaurus said:
NotStan said:

Damn that is one big discussion, although the idea of linking character/their aligment to their role in the game is interesting, I personally don't know what to make of it. An interesting theory but could be flawed in a sense that those names used could just be assigned randomly. As I said going by Gnizmo's theory, vetteman seems like a likely target,

FoS Vetteman94


Did I miss something? I never saw Gnizmo saying Vetteman was a likely target, he's been pretty focused on Darth since the beginning of the day.

parenting

TruckOSaurus said:
Gnizmo said:


Not entirely, but I am willing to back off for now. Not enough people have come out in support of it. I am still in favor of lynching Darth as a lurker which would without question prove or disprove my theory. If more people want to come out saying its a good one then I am willing to pursue it to the end though. Of course I am the paranoid sort who fears people lying to me.

At this point, I think there's too many people saying alignments don't match to go along with your theory. That being said, I wouldn't mind lynching Darth for his lurker status and the arkwark timing of his roleclaim. He could have very well made it because he figured we'd think a Mafia wouldn't dare make such a claim.

countering gnizmo's theory (despite it being sort of right, as eventually shown)
WIFOM on darth.

TruckOSaurus said:

On the contrary it does match but I'm having problems believing 3 or 4 Mafia players would have come forward and said "I don't match" when they knew they'd fall under suspicion of the town. Especially considering most nameclaims were done after you exposed your theory of matched alignments.

trucks says his name and alignment match, counters gniz again.

TruckOSaurus said:
A Bad Clown said:

The main flaw I see though in the theory is that is vetteman is possibly a traitor, then someone would have to recruit him. In World of Warcraft did any character turn the athur evil?


If I remember correctly, he turns evil by himself after picking up Frostmorne (a sword).

Assisting ABC in figuring something out. Says vetteman's character becomes evil. (I believe in some games, there is a role that has to kill once in order to become bad, but I could be wrong.) Unsure what this could mean.

TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:

Can someone, anyone, anywhere, read my posts about dsis?

I feel I am making some really good posts and I haven't had one comment on either of them.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3964947

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3965024

Guess we got caught in the debate about names, we're not really good at multi-tasking it seems.

About your first link, he does contradict himself. Although I think "Look at it this way. I push a lynch on you people start suspecting me [...]" could be interpreted as "Let's suppose I push a lynch on you..." meaning this whole sentence was just theory.

Gives me the exact same excuse that dsis will eventually use.

TruckOSaurus said:

Well the townie wouldn't be told he's a sibling with a Mafia. The role PMs would look like that:

Player A : You're a Mafia Sibling, your brother is Player B. If he dies, you die.

Player B: You're a Sibling, your brother is Player A. If he dies, you die.

explaining siblings

TruckOSaurus said:

That was my point earlier but I checked the Mafia Wiki and it seems what I had in mind fits the Lovers variation better than Siblings.

From the Mafia Wiki

Siblings are roles that know each each other's alignment, and die when any of the other siblings die. The classic Siblings roles are a Goon and a Cop who know each other, with the condition that if one dies, the other commits suicide the following night - however, the roles could be any town/mafia pair.

Variations

The Siblings do not know each other's alignments (in this case they are called Lovers).

I wouldn't rule out the possibility of siblings having the same conditions as Lovers since they are very similar roles.

corrects himself

TruckOSaurus said:
Baalzamon said:
TruckOSaurus said:
MetalGear_94 said:
TruckOSaurus said:
radishhead said:

"I was getting bored" suggests that he'd be less bored if the game moved onto night 1?

Well there was a 7 hour gap between Heph's post (4:24 EST) and Gnizmo's post (11:27 EST) I'm guessing Metal_Gear's boredom comes from this lack of activity. Seems he was itching to post but needed someone to initate the day's conversation. Not too sure what this means though.

Exactly.

All I have is this thread to keep me occupied during march break.

So this means you could have upgraded your FoS to a vote without having to wait for Gnizmo to voice his suspicions of him?

For some reason this post seems to irk me into being suspicious of TruckOSaurus...radishhead seemed to be trying to lure others into thinking metalgear was somebody with a role that is more exciting during the night (such as mafia), and then truck popped in, with a first comment that seemed to contradict radishhead, and then going after metalgear.

I could be totally wrong, but this post is yelling that truck and radish were trying to work together on this one, and radish just happened to wind up being a mafia member.

FoS: TruckOSaurus

I was trying to see Metal_Gear's motivation behind a quick vote. His behavior was scummy and questions needed to be asked about it. Also, from what I've observed in the last few games, scum loves to accuse each other of the first day so radish trying to insinuate that Metal_Gear was Mafia doesn't automatically make Metal_Gear town now that radish has showed up scum.

Baal confirms my assessment of the post, and trucks rebuts.

TruckOSaurus said:
hatmoza said:

Wrong. Whoever killed Final-Fan did not do it intentionally. Radish's killer successfully targeted Radish. In this case it was either the opposing mafia faction or the SK. However, in F-F's case, he was not the initial target, nor was he meant to be targeted and killed. He was bussed by the person who was supposed to get killed.

The busser knows this, and the killer knows this.

Which one are you?

not much here.

TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:

there's a role, I forget what it is atm, but it's basically a watcher, but instead of watching WHO goes to what person, he sees WHAT happened to that person.

So, say I target FF, I would know, "Night-killed" "bussed" "roleblocked"

 

Now, to add on to the series of events, according to the fluff (flavor) FF's arms were BOUND. That could be a roleblock. So, I'm starting to think that this series of events IS exactly what happened.

However, this would also require that Hat was targeted by 3 players. Night-killed, roleblocked, bussed, oh and tracked. 4 players would have to target Hat. That's quite a substantial number.

It would also have to ignore that FF was wearing his goggles.

Catching up with the thread here so I don't know if this was addressed already but the role you're looking for is Watcher and that's precisely what Final-Fan was. I can't imagine there being two watchers.

misunderstanding. The role I was looking for was voyeur.

TruckOSaurus said:

Okay let me get this straight... I'm going to assume everyone who revealed information is telling the truth for the time being to see if we can get a plausible scenario.

- hatmoza protects Final-Fan but he dies anyway.

- outlaw tracks hatmoza who said he went out but outlaw gets a "Stayed at home" result

This indeed points to a busser who switched hatmoza and Final-Fan last night.

Problem #1: Why switch two high profile players together? If the intention of the bus driver was to protect hatmoza why not switch him out with a lurker? (I wanna state that I really really don't want to consider the possibility of a Mafia Bus Driver since it was established this was a broken role)

Problem #2: outlaw received a "Stayed at home" result, if we assume the above switch, it would mean Final-Fan did not watch anyone last night which is highly unlikely.  I guess Final-Fan being role-blocked could possibly explain this since a blocked person would "stay home".

So all in all nothing is impossible and both hatmoza's and outlaw's version can be true at the same time but this also means we're dealing with lots of town power roles which in return means a strong Mafia.

summing up a post. Most of these things were already said at this point.

TruckOSaurus said:
Hephaestos said:

HoS Hat

your roleclaim made you shift from possible mafia killer to Vanilla townie that will never be night killed.... the most convenient of covers. Even a cop investigation of you sounds useless as you're in the perfect cover for a godfather (and goon sugests there is one).

-> can't be killed

-> can't be investigated

-> easy to say you protected the wrong person for the rest of the game... on average docs get less than 1 right call and that would have been FF for you.

This town has no option than to lynch you on Lylo, congratz, you repeated linkz stunt of last game.... and he was mafia, are you?

I just wanted to point this out for every townie to sink it into their mind should they survive to the last day (lylo is last lynch before losing... so if you misslynch, you lose... and that's the time where you want to lynch the "unconfirmable" characters that claimed something making them out of reach ( such as a miller or in this case, a townie that can't be night killed).

This is distrubing, I agree with your conclusion that hatmoza could be scum covering all bases with his roleclaim (he does seem to be a very powerful version of a bodyguard). Frankly, I don't know what to do about it. Lynching him because of this possibility runs the risk of us loosing a great asset (both in the player and the role) but now that you've put it out there that he should be lynched at Lylo, a remaining scum could use him as a shield to secure a victory.

Another, I don't know what to do about this while at the same time suggesting that hat is a liability. He did the same thing with metal gear and radish, like the post quoted a couple quotes above where radish pointed something out, trucks tried to squash it, and then implied that mg is very suspicious.

TruckOSaurus said:

Unless the mod is unusually cruel, he will reveal all role info when someone dies.

answering a question

TruckOSaurus said:
Baalzamon said:

Don't tell me I'm not reading the thread just because I see certain things as taking different paths than what you see.

hatmoza said he was supposedly a bodyguard, in which case, considering we have since realized it is possible he was role blocked without a PM, how can he be so certain that ff was bussed.  Also, if hatmoza was role blocked, then would it not make since that outlaw could say hatmoza didn't do anything, as he didn't because he was roleblocked.

He WAS certain of it BEFORE he realized he was blocked. He doesn't believe it anymore.

countering baal. Possible parenting.

TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:

 

In order of appearance:

DAY 1:

Name  (C/NC/?/M/Slip)

wonk 13-19-0-0-0
radish 3-11-1-4-0
MG 8-37-1-0-0
notstan 1-27-0-0-0
vette 5-1-1-1-0
dsis 11-20-0-2-0
hat 7-9-0-1-0
ABC 8-26-0-4-0
Baal 1-6-1-12-0
prof 6-4-0-0-0
ff 4-9-0-0-0
truck 10-7-0-0-0
Heph 10-16-0-3-0
Gnizmo 4-1-1-0-0
outlaw 0-0-0-0-0-0
darth 2-3-0-1-0 

Outlaw got a 0 because I don't count, "Hi, I'm here" posts as posts. That would be unfair.

Trophies:
MOST POSTS:
MetalGear: 46 posts
ABC: 38
Dsis: 33

MOST CONTENT:
wonk: 13
dsis: 11
truck&heph: 10 each

MOST NON-CONTENT:
MG: 37
Notstan: 27
ABC: 26

MOST MISTAKES:
Baal: 12
Radish&ABC: 4
Heph: 3

BEST RATIO:
Gnizmo: 66%
Vette: 62.5%
Theprof00: 60%
Truck: 58%
nothing else over 50%

WORST RATIO:
Notstan: 3.7%
Baal: 5%
MG: 17.4%
Radish: 18.75%
nothing else under 20% (ABC was the next closest at 21%)

That was one big post. I'll comment on the stats and come back to the noted posts later as needed.

NotStan and Baal are new players, which kinda forgives the lower ratio of content in their posts (to a certain extent). NotStan didn't make much of an impression on me so he's neutral to me right now but Baal did strike me as the perfect case of the paranoid townie new player on Day One.

I'm surprised by the amount of NC posts by Metal_Gear, did you count his posts when he was questionned about his quick vote as non-content? Also surprised at MG being the one with the most posts, history would indicate he's not scum since he lurks a lot when scum but then again he could be scum that has learned from his mistake.

says notstan is neutral, and defends baal. However, he specifically looks at MGs posts, saying MG is most suspicious. Does the thing he does again where he first defends a player and then implies suspicion on them. Keep in mind he has not done this tactic with ANY of the flipped mafia. This could be his tell.

TruckOSaurus said:
Hephaestos said:


sure... but Hat IS the type of player that can pull a trick like this... especially with his history of early role claims as town.

I know he is, which is why I'm so torn about him. As described by hatmoza, his role seems too powerful which leads me to believe it could be a fabrication but then again hatmoza could have embelished some parts of his powers to ward off scum.

defends hatmoza. Trying to buddy himself before the nightkill so as to avoid "revenge-suspicion"?

TruckOSaurus said:
Linkzmax said:

Votals:

[1,L-7] darthdevidem01: Gnizmo
With 14 alive it takes 8 to lynch.

I have no plans to modkill anyone for lurking if people are waiting for that. I will modpoke or try to replace if necessary, but there isn't a general lack of activity from everyone which warrants a blanket rule.

Well that seals it for me.
Vote: darthdevidem01

first vote, lands on a townie. In fact, this is his first anything. His only other FoS was a "joke".

TruckOSaurus said:

My vote is mostly because of his lurker status but also because of how he roleclaimed out of the blue at the start of the day. If he's just a townie not participating, my vote will put some additional pressure on him to get on with the posting!

explains his vote

TruckOSaurus said:
Wonktonodi said:

I have some questions.

1. Outlaw why did you find in necisary to roleclaim this early?

For everyone else what are your thoughts on the early roleclaim

2. What is a reasonable amount of time to wait for those that are currently lurking?

3. What are your thoughts on the current make out of the game based on deaths role claims and implied roles? I don't want this one to get too drawn out though.

4. Do you feel as I feel that metal gear is being an active lurker?

Guess I'll start by answering those questions.

1. I'm not against early roleclaims per say but you have to have a valid reason behind it. outlawauron had information about hatmoza (but I still question if that was enough to warrant the claim), darth had no reason whatsoever to roleclaim, hatmoza had to roleclaim because of the mess of suppositions we were heading into.

2. I guess something like 24-36h much less if they post in other threads like crazy.

3. I don't know what to make up of all this except that we shouldn't close our minds to any options unless they have been proven to be impossible.

4. When prof posted his potals, I was truely surprised that Metal_Gear was the top poster. That tells me that a lot of his posts didn't have an impact on me so yes there's a part of active lurking in MG's behavior. What troubles me the most though is that since comments have been made on the lack of content of his posts MG has gone into silent mode. I'm not prepared to vote for him based of that yet but my suspicion of him has risen a lot.

I just took another look at this post and I noticed this response
Q:3. What are your thoughts on the current make out of the game based on deaths role claims and implied roles? I don't want this one to get too drawn out though.

"I don't know what to make up of all this except that we shouldn't close our minds to any options unless they have been proven to be impossible."

"I don't know what to make up of all this"

"I don't know what to make up"

Feels like a possible slip.

TruckOSaurus said:

Interesting turn of events about NotStan here. As I said before, I was pretty neutral on him but he did seem to put out the "I'm a newb" card a bit much and now since people have started voting for him he pulled out every scum trick in the bag: No Lynch vote, revenge vote on hatmoza, refusal to roleclaim saying he's important.

Now, he's finally roleclaimed Roleblocker which is quite plausible with what we know as of now but it doesn't fit at all with his vote on hatmoza. I think NotStan was one of the few who got really riled up about hatmoza's "Thank God, I'm a townie" so him roleblocking hat is logical but with how Day Two played out if he's really the roleblocker he should be thinking "hatmoza is telling the truth".

Also, someone already corrected NotStan on the "invincibility" of the Elite Bodyguard but I'd like to add that if hatmoza does have this role, him roleclaiming was a really smart move because it scares scum shitless. From now on they'll be afraid to kill who they really want dead for fear of dying themselves.

point of no return for notstan, truck finally calls out notstan.

TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:

See, I'm used to seeing a mafia roleblocker though. 

It's a tough decision. On one hand, I have a person claiming roleblocker, a role that is normally antagonistic, and on the other hand, I have a player who is pretty much a bomb. Both are good choices for a lynch because either or both could be lying. I need to see what notstan says about his role first.

Is he a roleblocker, or was it just for one night. His language makes it look like it was a one-shot ability. Either way, I'm not sure what I should do, and I'll most-likely remove my vote no matter what, but I'd like for everything to be clean and clear before I do anything.

I don't know why when I think Roleblocker, I always think town first although the role is much more appropriate for Mafia. As town, a Roleblocker is like a weak cop (block X if there's one less death X must be scum) but a blocker with bad aim can be pretty harmful to the town.

As you said, before we go ahead with voting/unvoting, I think we need to hear NotStan's clarifications.

undermines my theory, says, "let's give notstan a chance".

TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:

I used to think that roleblocker should be pro-town, but imo, roleblocker only really makes sense as a mafia, because otherwise, town has too many chances to block a kill, and with this setup, where we can see hat as a guardian (bodyguard), we know there is at least 2 chances to block a kill, and if there is a doctor (are there ever games without one), then there would be three chances. With 14 people, and two kills, that's nearly a 50% chance to prevent a kill if a roleblocker exists. (Also, hat could be lying, skewing these results. Also, it's possible that instead of a doc there could be a faith healer, which is 50% chance to doc, AND Hat could be lying, etc etc)

There's too many variables to think about without his full explanation, but anything is possible. I'd be more inclined to believe a one-shot roleblock than a town roleblocker.

The only reason I'd be willing to believe so many "protective" roles right now would be because we've got ourselves two killing factions. It is possible we don't have a doctor, there wasn't any in the game where Stefl was the half-cop (hatmoza's game if my memory's good). Luckily the fear of a doctor kept Stefl alive until very late.

Also, if everyone's telling the truth, we've got ourselves a very powerful town (tracker, watcher, body guard, roleblocker, possible doc and cop), this makes me dread what the Mafia (or Mafias) have to compensate for this.

rebuttal

TruckOSaurus said:
Wonktonodi said:
theprof00 said:

well guys, honestly I'd rather MG than darth, but seeing as darth is more of a lurker, well...


I agree with you although just a thought. You have trouble thinking of ABC getting scum twice in a row this would make 3 for metal gear.

Don't mess with prof's head!

Frankly, I wouldn't mind voting for Metal_Gear at this point too. We have his quick vote on ABC yesterday and his sudden disappearance once his posting has come under question. Although from the lurker angle, between MG and darth, MG is the one who's most likely to come back to us.

Seems eager to get me to pursue metalgear.

TruckOSaurus said:
Baalzamon said:
Wonktonodi said:


Metal gear has been on the site much more recent than darth and has just stoped posting while darth hasn't been on the site at all in two days.

I know that, but I also thought one of metalgears first posts of the day was rather strange.  Radish was dead, and proven to be mafia, and metalgear immediately found it necessary to clear any and all relationships he had with radish (which were slim).  If I recall, he was the only one who thought it necessary to do this, but why was it so important to him to get unassociated with radish, when other people had conversed with him as well?

That's a very good point actually, Heph noted it here

Hephaestos said:

oh and HoS MG

notably for analysing only Radish's death (and something else that i might use later)

and for the little Bussdriver discution with hat (FoS Hat, though dependent on MG)

Maybe MG analyzed only radish's death because he knew full well what had happened to Final-Fan and also, like Baal says, because he wanted to disassociate himself from radish.

fomenting votes in MGs direction, both from Heph and Baal and in the post previously, myself.

TruckOSaurus said:

@Heph: What was the something you talked about when you said  "and something else that i might use later" ?

I would like to know this as well.

TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:

also, can someone let me know how many posts darth has made during day 2?

I think his roleclaim is the only post for Day Two

answers a question

TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:

shucks, ninja'd.

Like I said, I'm considering the possibility of a silencer/dentist with a slight variation that a player is allowed to make one post.

Wouldn't he have mentionned in that one post that he was silenced or is it forbidden? One way or another I highly doubt that's what we have here.

my ridiculous post was countered by truck. Hey, it could've been true. dsis, trucks, and heph are the only ones that countered my idea. Hat enforced it with an HoS, while the others tried to get me to see that darth was lurking.

TruckOSaurus said:

With him not posting anywhere else on the site, I'd wager it's not the case but since right now Metal_Gear is just as suspicious as darth to me, I'd be willing give darth a chance and switch my vote to MG.

Ready to switch vote to mg on my say.

TruckOSaurus said:
MetalGear_94 said:
Wonktonodi said:

Better do a good job with this since some of the accusations against you are in there.

How is that at all insight into what is going on in the game?

It's not that you have a high post count that is the problem. It is the lack of posts of quality and your complete drop off after being called out for that.


What else can I say, but this is how I play the game  =/

my post count isn't the only thing similar in those games, im playing like how used to play before and this has been the only time I've been called out for active lurking.

and I kinda got a little pissed off that people think im active lurking when I am actually trying play the damn game and it really put me off from playing for a while.

Getting this kind of call out is never pleasant. I remember dsister telling me I brought nothing new to the discussion and that I only mirrored Final-Fan's opinions during one game, I was pissed and understand why you would be put off too but disappearing for a couple of days isn't the best way to wash away those kind of accusations.

If you're really pro-town just keep on digging to find scum, point out things you think might be a tell, question people.

Speaking of questionning people, I have one for you... you came under fire for your quick ABC vote on Day One, what's your stance on him now?

looks like buddying with mg. Possible parenting.

TruckOSaurus said:
NotStan said:

Oh snap. I wrote out a long ass post but Opera ended up crashing on me so I lost the progress that I had *Shakes fist at the Shockwave plugin*, unfortunately as I am heading off to bed I can't another long-ass post, will try to repost it either during the day tomorrow or during the evening, depends when I get home.

I don't know what your long ass post contained but here's what I would want you to address:

With the notion that you knew you had blocked hatmoza, what was going through your head as hatmoza started making his claims about the presence of a bus driver and all the theories that followed? Why did you still vote for him when your block explains perfectly the chain of events of the day?

parenting. Important to note that he never brought this point up until everyone else did.

TruckOSaurus said:

How exactly is claiming Elite Bodyguard scaring the townies? (I have my theory on that but I'll let you answer for yourself before I mention it.)

counters notstan

TruckOSaurus said:

I wouldn't put all my hopes in the intervention of a cop since the combinaison of tracker and watcher could very well be in play to replace the cop.

not much to see here.

TruckOSaurus said:

Yes he could be lying his ass off but the beautiful thing here is that we can afford to wait it out a bit since he has some chances to prove himself (by defending someone successfully). So right now we have no reason to remove hatmoza from the equation because the benefits to the town outweigh the risks. As the game goes on, we'll re-evaluate the threath he poses.

promises that they will reevaluate Hat. Again, defend first, accuse second tactic.

TruckOSaurus said:

I'd be ready to hammer... you guys think I should wait for Wonk?

wants to hammer

TruckOSaurus said:
Wonktonodi said:

I'm caught up and I'll do it.

Unvote

Vote: notstan


Not fair! :P

Now we wait for Linkzmax and we'll know if we were right.

Really wanted to hammer.

TruckOSaurus said:
A Bad Clown said:
TruckOSaurus said:

If he does turn up town, my first step will be a HoS (or a vote) on you for this comment.


I'm implying if Notstan is town, and anoter town person comes up dead by morning, who would you suspect? I'd go straight to the person who tried to lynch train him.

Nothing is ever that simple. Everyone will have to answer for their previous actions and right now you're looking more and more like you're setting up the next mislynch.

not sure. Possibly setting up abc?

TruckOSaurus said:
Wonktonodi said:
TruckOSaurus said:


Not fair! :P

Now we wait for Linkzmax and we'll know if we were right.


Yeah I was tempted to say you may have the honor while at the same time I've yet to hammer anyone in these games. Unless I'm horribly mistaken.

Well we can't all be radishhead, he really mastered the art of hammering!

unsure.

End of day 2.



A Bad Clown said:
Vetteman94 said:
A Bad Clown said:

Guys, that flavor may be on to something. According to the WoW wiki Jaina Proudmore was once in love with Arthus.

Jaina was one of the most talented and trusted sorceresses of the Kirin Tor. She was dispatched by Antonidas to discover what was happening in the northlands of Lordaeron. She was escorted by her childhood friend and one-time romantic interest, Prince Arthas Menethil, to uncover if the plague had magical origins. Jaina saw the fall of Lordaeron firsthand and — guided by a mysterious prophet — rallied what survivors she could and fled across the sea to Kalimdor.

Look at this picture: 

Linkz said "Only Gnizmo would notice this", being that Gnizmo is a WoW fan and would have known about the romance and the sword. The only results for WoW Swords with animals I could find linked to this sword. Any thoughts on this?

That looks like a skull

The clue was animal painting, also I found this:

"The group were not willing to tolerate this behavior, so they moved closer until one of them shook the cosplayer. That's when his head rolled off his neck and landed on the ground with a muted thud."

RAdish's head was chopped off, and gniz wound up stabbed. I've looked up every character and so far only the sword is the only possible that can be mistaken for a "painted animal".

I dont see how this can be mistaken for painted

What about this weapon, almost the same thin,  why did you skip this one?



Vetteman94 said:
A Bad Clown said:

The clue was animal painting, also I found this:

"The group were not willing to tolerate this behavior, so they moved closer until one of them shook the cosplayer. That's when his head rolled off his neck and landed on the ground with a muted thud."

RAdish's head was chopped off, and gniz wound up stabbed. I've looked up every character and so far only the sword is the only possible that can be mistaken for a "painted animal".

I dont see how this can be mistaken for painted

What about this weapon, almost the same thin,  why did you skip this one?

According to the WoW wiki it's a reward also for a quest involving the Lich King. Linkz said he played up to burning crusade so he it's likely he was looking at the old frostmourne. It didn't reappear until the lich king lich king.



19:44:34 Skeezer METAL GEAR ONLINE
19:44:36 Skeezer FAILURE
19:44:51 ABadClown You're right!
19:44:55 ABadClown Hur hur hur
19:45:01 Skeezer i meant
19:45:04 Skeezer YOU ARE A FAILKURE
19:45:08 Skeezer FAILURE*
TruckOSaurus said:

So hatmoza chose wisely as promised (or maybe it was random.org but I'll give hatmoza credit for this one until we know for sure).

dsister was Mafia this will provide some useful info once we dig through his posts (which I won't do right now but later).

If we go back to our scenarios from Day Two, we have many possible outcomes:

- Mafia A wiped out and a full Mafia B

- Mafia A at 1, Mafia B at 2

- Third party killer and a hurting Mafia (probably a 2 left)

congratulating hat (possible mafia complaining). To note, is that he doesn't wonder if mafia just chose him directly. Also notes the "probable" size of mafia at 5.

TruckOSaurus said:
Hephaestos said:

 

umh looks unlikely that the other 2 are in here... though it is a 5 people faction ^^

Not familiar with WoW's story but why are the other 2 not likely to be in here?

response to heph

TruckOSaurus said:
outlawauron said:

I'm just going to say that I really like  hat. He's a cool guy and did some cool guy things.

Ooooookay... I'm gonna guess you followed hatmoza last night and saw who he protected. If that's the case I think you should disclose the information since it might give us some insight into the Mafia's mind.

Not sure. Could be asking for the info so that all cards are on the table and there aren't any surprises, or some other reason.

TruckOSaurus said:

So either the Mafia decided to kill Wonk or they didn't believe hatmoza and targetted him.

I wish I knew which one it is because if it's the second option it would make a bit less suspicious of A Bad Clown. Since he was already under heavy suspicion from the town, the Mafia would have most likely sent him to walk on the hatmoza mine.

says if targetting hat were true, they would've sent abc. I'm not sure why that would be true. Eh.

TruckOSaurus said:
Wonktonodi said:


But they could also try sending out someone who they don't think will be tracked.

My point was that if you're taking the gamble of calling hatmoza's bluff you send your most vulnerable member thinking if he does get killed at least your other members are better hidden in the crowd.

counters wonk. It's possible, but still unsure what to make of it.

TruckOSaurus said:

I've been racking my brain about the Gnizmo kill and I don't have much, other than:

- He was a pretty safe target for someone scared of hatmoza

- Him alluding to his role not being linked to his character could have misleaded scum to think he had a role and target him.

- random.org?

possible options. Unsure what he's trying to say. Could be trying to make random conversation.

TruckOSaurus said:
Vetteman94 said:

Maybe his knowledge of WoW scared someone into thinking they would be figured out

Yeah, he mentionned having a huge knowledge of WoW but to kill for this reason Gnizmo's alignment theory would have to be true and with darth being town and having a evil name (Kel'Thuzad) we know this to not be true.

vettes response to the above. Trucks downplays the reasoning.

TruckOSaurus said:

I don't get how anyone can conclude one way or the other.

We know hatmoza protected Wonk so:

If dsister targetted Wonk, we get a dead dsister and a dead hatmoza

If dsister targetted hatmoza, we get a dead dsister, and dead hatmoza

Same result.

Also, Wonk being the "targetted one" is relevant in only one instance: if there's only one big Mafia team because being targetted by the Mafia then proves you yourself are not Mafia. In the case of two families being "the targetted" doesn't absolve you from anything since you could be in the other team.

A town Wonk can't know what setup we've got against us right now so him caring about being "the targetted" points to him being a member of a big Mafia team.

(I sure hope I was clear, it all makes sense in my head but I'm not sure it translates well once written)

defends and accuses.

TruckOSaurus said:
Hephaestos said:

so far we lost 4 town and 3 mafia...

if we look at it we hardly could have done better... yet we're at lylo minus 1 if the other mafia is 3.... that plays against it in the balance...

the dagger signature does point to sk more than vig... but a lone sk is a bit low in scum...

How so? If we're dealing with a SK, the Mafia team will be in higher numbers than 3 right?

misunderstanding, i think.

TruckOSaurus said:

I may be critized for doing this but I'll use any info I can get.

Night 2 lasted from 03/22/11 17:37 EST to 03/24/11 13:36 EST

In that time span, outlawauron posted 3 times ( at 03/23/11 00:35 EST, 03/23/11 00:06 EST, 03/22/11 21:29 EST).

To be fair, all those posts are only hours after Night Two started so he could have thought, "I'll send my action later" but I find it rather strange that after a long absence that prevented him from sending his night action, he managed to get back to the thread in just under an hour after Day Three had started.

Am I getting too paranoid here? Or is Wonk's theory valid and outlawauron is using inside information to make himself look like a tracker?

(bolded) defends and accuses

TruckOSaurus said:

^^ I thought putting me waaaay down like that was kinda weird! :P

I won't put in order but I've got a strong town vibe from: prof, Baalzamon, Vetteman

I had a strong town vibe from outlawauron but I'm considering Wonk's theory about him because it fits with his unwarranted roleclaim and the second tracking of hatmoza. So I'd put him neutral right now.

Wonk and Heph are pretty neutral leaning town.

ABC and MG are the ones I'd put under possible scum here.

(bolded) Did that make you nervous? Because you seem relieved.

(italicized) defends and accuses (well, not really defends, but very wishy washy)

TruckOSaurus said:

For ABC, there's the orange joke from Day One. Although it seems silly, it's hard to ignore that two of the people joking around with this at the start of the game ended up being scum.

Also, yesterday it really seemed he was setting up hatmoza's lynch for today just before the NotStan reveal. This wouldn't make any sense in a one Mafia environment since he would have known NotStan would flip scum (them being on the same team) but if we consider the two teams alternative maybe he was banking on NotStan flipping town and preparing the terrain to get rid of a huge threat to his team.

explanation for suspicion. Forgets that he himself was joking around with them. Uses 2 family theory to push a theory.

TruckOSaurus said:

For Metal_Gear, there's the quick vote on A Bad Clown on Day One. He went from posting a lot to being practically absent once he was criticized about content.

He also was singled out by NotStan before his lynch. This part could fall on both sides though since NotStan could have thought he was protecting him or painting a target of him depending on his reasoning at the moment (did he believe he could get off the hook with his answer or had he already accepted his fate?)

second explanatino for suspicion. Notes the quick vote on abc as being suspicious, despite suspecting abc himself. Notes the lurking. NOTING THIS FOR LATER -> agrees with my point that Notstan singled MG out. The only other person that will do this is Vetteman!

HoS Vetteman

TruckOSaurus said:
Hephaestos said:


3... radish added himself to the list...

 

but your second paragraph is in contradiction with the first ^^ if he joked with them it'd point to same team.

Hmmm you're right, guess he's scum whether there's one or two Mafia teams! :P

looking to lynch abc.

TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:

Yaknow, I'm just gunna vote MG

I think he's the SK, can't say for sure, but I'm pretty confident.

I also think that there might only be one mafia left.

 

Vote: MG

What points you to SK more than Mafia for MetalGear? Do you think he had reasons to want Gnizmo dead?

not sure why he asks this.

TruckOSaurus said:

Are you saying your list goes outlaw is more suspicious than prof who is more suspicious than ABC... etc? Cause I read it the other way around i.e. "I trust outlaw more than prof who I trust more than ABC..."

clarifying heph's list.

TruckOSaurus said:

Shouldn't you be worried about your placement in the list? :)

About the random.org, the only way I could see it being the Mafia is for a last member not sending his PM or two-three members arguing over who to kill and then leaving the argument open for too long. Both of these do seem unlikely.

wishy washy. "It could be this, but then again, it could not."

TruckOSaurus said:

I won't push my investigation by asking you to add me on Facebook so I can check, I'm not that obssessed.

I'm still concerned about your roleclaim and the timing of it. When you did it, hatmoza wasn't revealed as a bodyguard so you put yourself in danger and this for information that wasn't vital, why did you do it?

pushing against outlaw?

TruckOSaurus said:
A Bad Clown said:

I'd like to bring up the possibility outlaw isn't a tracker, he could be disguising his role. I'm not saying he's not pro town, but it would sort of make sense. The random.org thing happened because he couldn't send the pm, and if dsister was killed by random.org then outlaw might have a killing power.

In that case, outlaw would have to be scum because a vigilante doesn't get ramdomized he just skips the night.

clarifies abc's theory.

TruckOSaurus said:
A Bad Clown said:


That might be it, when I looked the real day after night 2 started everyone had logins that made them able to PM except outlaw. Dsister had to be the one who sent the mafia kill though because he got killed by heph, maybe we found a serial killer?

Not really, it's a would be a real (stupid) gamble for a serial killer to claim hatmoza stayed at home like that if you don't have inside info that guarantees you hatmoza didn't move that night.

clarifies again.

TruckOSaurus said:
Wonktonodi said:

If outlaw is scum he'd need to be part of the mafia team. Otherwise how would he know that hat was blocked night one?

So while I'm suspicious of outlaw. I don't think he should be the focus of today. Also one other thing I want to double check. Did he say hat had done nothing before hat was talking about bussing?


hatmoza had already mentionned theories of a Bus Driver but it was before he started the very affirmative posts that eventually led to his roleclaim ( by that I mean the posts where he stated that Final-Fan HAD TO have been bussed).

clarifies

TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:


like this post
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3970834

 

I don't thikn he voted at this point, even though what he's saying is worthy of a vote. It's almost like he's saying, "how could you fuck up like that"

I don't see how this is parenting, that's how I investigate, you could say I'm more of a "good cop" than a "bad cop" when it comes to asking questions to a suspect. Maybe I should be more aggresive but saying things like "I demand an answer" or "You should give us this information" just isn't me. You just have to look at the post I made for outlaw before the weekend, I said "I'd really like an answer to my question..." not "You better answer my question or else".

My post highlighted contradictions between the version NotStan presented to us and how the day played out, I wanted to know if he had something to say that would explain his behavior.

Doesn't really counter my assertion. I mentioned in the day 2 recap that this is trucks giving notstan "a second chance".

TruckOSaurus said:

You jumping on a post where you would have said "should" instead of "would" to instantly make me scum in your eyes tells me a lot about your desperation right now. I'm not done reading the thread but I think you just edged out Metal_Gear in the suspicious department.

For the record, if I were scum, I would never ever try to scold a fellow Mafia member during the day, especially not one so deep in it like NotStan was at that point.

(bolded) WIFOM. But I agree. He turns on notstan, he doesn't really scold him. Previously to that, he practically defends him in several instances.

TruckOSaurus said:
A Bad Clown said:

It's starting to seem like that, I actually just found a post that may show us if Trucks is mafia

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3970012

Trucks seems to be trying to convince prof with his "towness" that there is no roleblocker and NotStan is lying, NotStan flipped just as he said.

Also I'd like to even post dsister's possible unintentional assocation with Trucks: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3957898

First post: Where in that post do I refute the existance of a roleblocker, I'm discussing the possibility a pro-town roleblocker vs a Mafia roleblocker. Don't try to make me say things I didn't just to serve your case.

Second post: Many players can attest to the fact the dsister has been voting for me at the start of games for a long while now.

Oh and another thing:

Vote: A Bad Clown

You grasping at anything to put me in a bad light has convinced me you're much scummier than Metal_Gear.

I agree. If there's one thing a bad clown excels at, it's poorly wording and formulating accusations.

TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:

also if everyone could please finish giving me a trust-list numbered 1 to 8.

Baal, you're missing 1-6

and I'm missing trust lists for about 4 other people.

Is mine okay or do you want set positions?

Looking for approval. at this point, I really trusted trucks, so it could be reciprocal buddying.

TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:

oops again, my list is supposed to be outlaw, then trucks.

However, I do have to change my list I suppose, because since then, I saw the parenting thing, then abc pointed out some interesting things, and I'm really shocked by trucks' revenge vote on abc.

HoS trucks.

You can call it a revenge vote if you want but I'm only voting for someone who distorts my posts to try and save himself from a lynch.

Please tell me what is interesting about the posts ABC mentionned? I've posted it below:

It's starting to seem like that, I actually just found a post that may show us if Trucks is mafia

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3970012

Trucks seems to be trying to convince prof with his "towness" that there is no roleblocker and NotStan is lying, NotStan flipped just as he said.

lso I'd like to even post dsister's possible unintentional assocation with Trucks: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3957898

You're absolutely right, trucks. However, ABC is simply very very bad at making solid points. There is nothing in there that solidly shows anything. However, I think you turned on him because he started to eat up my idea and could possibly have made a big deal out of i, or even worse, alerted me.

TruckOSaurus said:

When have I refused to nameclaim? I'm Malfurion Stormrage. All you have to do is ask and I answer.

Unlike prof who failed to tell me what he found so interesting in ABC's outlined posts. Or completely ignored what I replied to his "parenting" suspicions. Suddenly that post hatmoza made about you at the end of Day Two seems to fit the bill completely:

For shame!

Either this is not prof, or you are scum turning a blind eye.

That roleclaim Notstan posted after showing all the signs of a newb scum is being overlooked by someone I almost considered town until now.

Read back from the start of day 2, and focus on my and notstan's post (or just read Truck's post I replied to moments ago). Then ask yourself, "is stan's behaviour pro-town?"

Suddenly turning on me.

TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:

heph, when truck is lynched, we'll see about those trust lists.

Only one vote and I'm lynched!?!? Why don't you want to answer my questions instead of stalling and attacking me to divert attention?

reasonable question.

TruckOSaurus said:

After rereading some posts from Day One and Two, there's not much to get out of dsister's posts that could point to other scum. Most of his Day Two contribution is him arguing with Prof over his Heph vote from Day One.

The only thing I got out of this trip back in time is that although prof ignoring my questions and replies really rubs me the wrong way, his instance on bringing back dsister's contractions on Day Two while everybody ignored it (we were all focused on the nameclaims and roleclaims) has restored my faith in his towniness.

I'll repost my answer to prof's parenting claim maybe this time he'll reply to it:

I don't see how this is parenting, that's how I investigate, you could say I'm more of a "good cop" than a "bad cop" when it comes to asking questions to a suspect. Maybe I should be more aggresive but saying things like "I demand an answer" or "You should give us this information" just isn't me. You just have to look at the post I made for outlaw before the weekend, I said "I'd really like an answer to my question..." not "You better answer my question or else".

My post highlighted contradictions between the version NotStan presented to us and how the day played out, I wanted to know if he had something to say that would explain his behavior.

 

 

Day 3, page 14 @100 posts per page, roughly 30 posts in.



Around the Network

Ok, so I didn't have nearly enough time to put together a post on all of the remaining day 2 and day 3, but I have all of my notes down on day 2 after my last post.

Continuation: To start, as we know, NotStan finally roleclaimed being a roleblocker.  Heph then unvoted and voted for Darth immediately, he also degraded Wonk back from an HoS to an FoS.  I then voted Darth as well.  Prof questioned NotStan about his roleclaim, and also brings out the possibility that NotStan is a mafia roleblocker.  Trucks seems to come back saying he generally thinks of roleblockers as town, however, it makes sense for them to be mafia.  I'm not quite certain if this was Trucks attempt to get the attention away from NotStan or if he was simply observing.  Trucks also mentions the idea of 2 killing factions if we have more protective roles, so once again, he is bringing up the idea that NotStan is on our team.  I unvoted Darth, as it seemed there was still discussion to be had, and I really didn't want my vote to be out there.  ABC then unvoted NotStan.  MetalGear finally came back.  Hat then put an HoS on Heph and MetalGear, and an HoS on prof for what he considered slightly suspicious behavior.

Something I found to be noteworthy is hat's suspicion list:

NotStan

Prof-for instituting the silencer idea about Darth

ABC-for paraphrasing and active lurking

Heph for being a "douche" and diverting NotStan Wagon

Thinks outlaw and trucks are town.

We obviously found out Hat was town, but I found it odd that he thinks Heph is supicious for diverting the NotStan wagon, yet thinks trucks is town, when trucks also seemed to be quite involved in diverting the mafia roleblocker idea away from NotStan.

ABC then mentions the idea that there is no doctor this game, because the bodyguard can essentially replace it.  NotStan unvoted Hat.  Heph says he doesn't want to vote NotStan, as he feels it would be better off for a cop to clear him, despite there still being no firm evidence that we do have a cop.  Heph instead votes for a time limit.  Prof asks NotStan who he would block tonite.  Gnizmo starts up the voting for NotStan again.  I also voted NotStan. 

NotStan mentions that he would have blocked MetalGear.  When NotStan said this, he knew he was going to be lynched, and we would discover that he was mafia.  He also knew that people were very suspicious of MetalGear.  So the more I think about this, the more I think he wanted to put out a name that we thought may be scum, but isn't actually scum, as he wouldn't want to put the target on one of his fellow mates.  Every time I come back to think of this, I am having an extremely difficult time not becoming less and less suspicious of MetalGear.

Wonk then hammered NotStan immediately after unvoting.

End Day 2

After re-analyzing the day, Truck has become a little more suspicious to me because of his posts that seemed to be trying to say its possible that NotStan is a pro town roleblocker.  I am also less suspicious of MetalGear now, as the whole NotStan roleblock is really just getting into my head...maybe I'm over analyzing it and there wasn't near that much to it.

For the Day 3 summary, I don't have any notes on it yet, nor will I tonight.  Hopefully, I'll be able to pull some time out of my ass tomorrow like I did tonight and finish it.  If not tomorrow night, other than a test I need to study for, I have loads of time open on Wednesday...I really am hoping for finishing it tomorrow though.



Money can't buy happiness. Just video games, which make me happy.

Wow. Thanks prof for the sharing of all the investigative work. I also think it's important that you include just about everything rather than just things that support your point. It was a very interesting read. I still don't distrust truck, but he does seem to follow a bit of a formula to his posting (although, everyone does have their style, you're a very aggressive mafia player).



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

outlawauron said:

Wow. Thanks prof for the sharing of all the investigative work. I also think it's important that you include just about everything rather than just things that support your point. It was a very interesting read. I still don't distrust truck, but he does seem to follow a bit of a formula to his posting (although, everyone does have their style, you're a very aggressive mafia player).


I figured that it would just be easier if I did.

One thing that i noticed between days 1 and 2/3 is that i'm more unsure of his posts on day 2 and 3. It's harder to tell what he's doing. Day 1, things are much more apparent. Maybe someone told him to cool off a bit?

Ironically, the thing that stands out the most to me, was that post saying,

"I don't know what to make up" lol



Baalzamon said:

Something I found to be noteworthy is hat's suspicion list:

NotStan

Prof-for instituting the silencer idea about Darth

ABC-for paraphrasing and active lurking

Heph for being a "douche" and diverting NotStan Wagon

Thinks outlaw and trucks are town.

Here's my theory on that.

actually suspects notstan
suspecting me to try and push me towards voting his way (which is why he told you to stay out of it. He knows how to push my buttons)
Actually suspects ABC
Heph, I'm not sure about. I did agree that Heph was suspicious, but looking at the trucks posts, he attacks Heph quite a bit. And I believe trucks is scum
I believe he truly believed outlaw

However, with trucks, I think he was suspicious of him and was trying to buddy up with him to keep himself from being killed as giving off the impression that trucks might be able to influence him.

Just a theory though. However, there is really nothing that should've made him truly believe that trucks was town.



theprof00 said:
Baalzamon said:

Something I found to be noteworthy is hat's suspicion list:

NotStan

Prof-for instituting the silencer idea about Darth

ABC-for paraphrasing and active lurking

Heph for being a "douche" and diverting NotStan Wagon

Thinks outlaw and trucks are town.

Here's my theory on that.

actually suspects notstan
suspecting me to try and push me towards voting his way (which is why he told you to stay out of it. He knows how to push my buttons)
Actually suspects ABC
Heph, I'm not sure about. I did agree that Heph was suspicious, but looking at the trucks posts, he attacks Heph quite a bit. And I believe trucks is scum
I believe he truly believed outlaw

However, with trucks, I think he was suspicious of him and was trying to buddy up with him to keep himself from being killed as giving off the impression that trucks might be able to influence him.

Just a theory though. However, there is really nothing that should've made him truly believe that trucks was town.

Trucks post on notstan. Saying that if notstan was town he should believe Hat and not be accusing him.

That could just have been trucks throwing notstan under the bus and trying to buddy up with Hat.