TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:
TruckOSaurus said:
Interesting turn of events about NotStan here. As I said before, I was pretty neutral on him but he did seem to put out the "I'm a newb" card a bit much and now since people have started voting for him he pulled out every scum trick in the bag: No Lynch vote, revenge vote on hatmoza, refusal to roleclaim saying he's important.
Now, he's finally roleclaimed Roleblocker which is quite plausible with what we know as of now but it doesn't fit at all with his vote on hatmoza. I think NotStan was one of the few who got really riled up about hatmoza's "Thank God, I'm a townie" so him roleblocking hat is logical but with how Day Two played out if he's really the roleblocker he should be thinking "hatmoza is telling the truth".
Also, someone already corrected NotStan on the "invincibility" of the Elite Bodyguard but I'd like to add that if hatmoza does have this role, him roleclaiming was a really smart move because it scares scum shitless. From now on they'll be afraid to kill who they really want dead for fear of dying themselves.
|
See, I'm used to seeing a mafia roleblocker though.
It's a tough decision. On one hand, I have a person claiming roleblocker, a role that is normally antagonistic, and on the other hand, I have a player who is pretty much a bomb. Both are good choices for a lynch because either or both could be lying. I need to see what notstan says about his role first.
Is he a roleblocker, or was it just for one night. His language makes it look like it was a one-shot ability. Either way, I'm not sure what I should do, and I'll most-likely remove my vote no matter what, but I'd like for everything to be clean and clear before I do anything.
|
I don't know why when I think Roleblocker, I always think town first although the role is much more appropriate for Mafia. As town, a Roleblocker is like a weak cop (block X if there's one less death X must be scum) but a blocker with bad aim can be pretty harmful to the town.
As you said, before we go ahead with voting/unvoting, I think we need to hear NotStan's clarifications.
|
I used to think that roleblocker should be pro-town, but imo, roleblocker only really makes sense as a mafia, because otherwise, town has too many chances to block a kill, and with this setup, where we can see hat as a guardian (bodyguard), we know there is at least 2 chances to block a kill, and if there is a doctor (are there ever games without one), then there would be three chances. With 14 people, and two kills, that's nearly a 50% chance to prevent a kill if a roleblocker exists. (Also, hat could be lying, skewing these results. Also, it's possible that instead of a doc there could be a faith healer, which is 50% chance to doc, AND Hat could be lying, etc etc)
There's too many variables to think about without his full explanation, but anything is possible. I'd be more inclined to believe a one-shot roleblock than a town roleblocker.
