By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Teen could be jailed for 2 years for killing pet hamster

I get that it's an animal and it suffered greatly, and I'm terribly sorry.

 But it's a hamster.

Two long years in prison, or at least 1/50, if not more, of your single life on earth.

For a hamster.

I say anger management as a warning, and then severe punishments if it happens again.



Around the Network
RCTjunkie said:

I get that it's an animal and it suffered greatly, and I'm terribly sorry.

 But it's a hamster.

Two long years in prison, or at least 1/50, if not more, of your single life on earth.

For a hamster.

I say anger management as a warning, and then severe punishments if it happens again.

If she can do it to a hamster

She could very well target a dog next.

Every single potential dog killing teen is an ENEMY of the Republic.

I say longer term in Jail, do what must be done Obama, do not hesitate, show no mercy!!



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

The two years in prison is probably the maximum sentence that can be given to the crime, the article implies that it is going to be the amount given which is almost certainly incorrect. It seems to me to be sensationalist reporting.



darthdevidem01 said:
RCTjunkie said:

I get that it's an animal and it suffered greatly, and I'm terribly sorry.

 But it's a hamster.

Two long years in prison, or at least 1/50, if not more, of your single life on earth.

For a hamster.

I say anger management as a warning, and then severe punishments if it happens again.

If she can do it to a hamster

She could very well target a dog next.

Every single potential dog killing teen is an ENEMY of the Republic.

I say longer term in Jail, do what must be done Obama, do not hesitate, show no mercy!!

First of all, I think this is sarcasm, at least the last 2 lines.

Addessing the first 2 lines, this is the slippery slope arguement, which I would assume that anger management would be able to fix and keep a moniter on her behavior to make sure he can become a productive society member instead of overcrowding jails.



Honestly I'd say two years would be unrealistic. People kill their pets all the time especially up North a ways. I know of people who shoot their neighbours dogs if they poop on their lawns. Now I don't think thats right and they should be penalized by a fine or something.

But a two year sentance to a juvinille offender is alittle over kill. Heck I think a week or two in jail would be sufficient in teaching this kid a lesson. How about mice which people kill in traps the traps are even sold in stores, don't they deserve justice what did they do to deserve being killed?

Now I don't think the kid was right. She got in a heated argument with a sibling and killed that siblings pet. The family obviously was pretty mad at her and wanted to set her straight or were just bad parent's trying to pass off their parental duties to the authorities. 2 years is to harsh for something 90% of us will do during our life time (Kill an animal that did no harm to us) infact where do you draw the line, bugs are living creatures with brains and feelings yet we kill thousands of them a year.

Fact of the matter is I think this should have been handled by the parent's, punishment should have been swift maybe a grounding for a few months to a year. But what a waste of tax dollars and time of court officials etc...etc...

Can you honestly tell me you have never killed a single living creature that did nothing to you?

What about that innocent fly that entered your house? Or that innocent mouse? Or farmers what about those innocent crows that just want to eat some berries?

I'm sure if your honest with yourself you are guilty of killing an innocent animal out of anger, fear or just for the fun of it!



-JC7

"In God We Trust - In Games We Play " - Joel Reimer

 

Around the Network

Should be 5 years.



Bet with Conegamer and AussieGecko that the PS3 will have more exclusives in 2011 than the Wii or 360... or something.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3879752

Joelcool7 said:

Honestly I'd say two years would be unrealistic. People kill their pets all the time especially up North a ways. I know of people who shoot their neighbours dogs if they poop on their lawns. Now I don't think thats right and they should be penalized by a fine or something.

But a two year sentance to a juvinille offender is alittle over kill. Heck I think a week or two in jail would be sufficient in teaching this kid a lesson. How about mice which people kill in traps the traps are even sold in stores, don't they deserve justice what did they do to deserve being killed?

Now I don't think the kid was right. She got in a heated argument with a sibling and killed that siblings pet. The family obviously was pretty mad at her and wanted to set her straight or were just bad parent's trying to pass off their parental duties to the authorities. 2 years is to harsh for something 90% of us will do during our life time (Kill an animal that did no harm to us) infact where do you draw the line, bugs are living creatures with brains and feelings yet we kill thousands of them a year.

Fact of the matter is I think this should have been handled by the parent's, punishment should have been swift maybe a grounding for a few months to a year. But what a waste of tax dollars and time of court officials etc...etc...

Can you honestly tell me you have never killed a single living creature that did nothing to you?

What about that innocent fly that entered your house? Or that innocent mouse? Or farmers what about those innocent crows that just want to eat some berries?

I'm sure if your honest with yourself you are guilty of killing an innocent animal out of anger, fear or just for the fun of it!


I've never intentionally killed an animal. I think people that kill spiders, ants, mice, birds or monkeys out of anger, for entertainement or to satisfy some silly Chinese medicinal superstition, are monsters. The hamster was also the property of the fathers, she stole and killed his property and has to take responsibility for it. Animals that are killed to be consumed are bred for that reason, they are used and are killed for a legitimate reason. They are also not choked to death and then thrown against the wall for no reason at all, only a deeply flawed human being would do that.

Even if I disagree with it, the death of mice is to stop an infestation in your home. The death of a hive of bees is stop them from attacking you in your own backyard. The death of spiders is to stop them from potentially biting you or infesting your home. The death of a caged pet hamster was for no reason at all and I'm glad she is being punished with jail time and I can only hope that animal cruelty laws can be taken more seriously in the future.



Bet with Conegamer and AussieGecko that the PS3 will have more exclusives in 2011 than the Wii or 360... or something.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3879752

Doobie_wop said:

The death of spiders is to stop them from potentially biting you or infesting your home.


You should be jailed for thought crime :)



Joelcool7 said:

Can you honestly tell me you have never killed a single living creature that did nothing to you?

What about that innocent fly that entered your house? Or that innocent mouse? Or farmers what about those innocent crows that just want to eat some berries?

Yes for bolded. And spiders don't count as innocent, I swear they are trying to wrap a web around me while I'm sleeping!

Innocent fly? trololol....call it innocent when it bites you on the face, or if its a innocent mosquito wait till you get malaria. 



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

Galaki said:
Doobie_wop said:

The death of spiders is to stop them from potentially biting you or infesting your home.


You should be jailed for thought crime :)


We must stop Doobie he's premeditating lol



-JC7

"In God We Trust - In Games We Play " - Joel Reimer