always using the good guy card...

next it'll be " I just saved a baby, a puppy and a kitten from the flames"... How the heck are we suposed to vote on that?

=)

yeah long days tend to be like WWI... dig in the trenches and just shout to the other side... long and tiresome.

For the points I made with my vote. The first I do once again address in the third link you've provided. "I don't know how scum think. I wouldn't put it past you to leave your scum-tell out in plain sight though." The second wasn't really a reason for me to be suspicious of Heph, but more a reason for me to not hold back from voting.

For the mentioning of prof: It's surprising(no not reall) you missed it since you quoted Heph here where he mentions my exchange with prof. I addresses that in this post with "I don't even know what you're getting at in the third paragraph. I have freely admitted that prof's interrogation of you has affected my suspicions, but he's also given me a town vibe. If he's scum and got me to vote for a townie, then I'm going to feel pretty stupid." I may have misinterpreted the parallel he was trying to draw, but it is true that prof has affected my thinking, as he tends to do every round.(whether that's intentional or not)

Do I have to bring up every single point I've made against someone when I vote? Go back to my post where I HoS'd Heph: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3918453 "Since you pointed it out once again, you defended me in my first game to try and gain the trust of a townie. You've done the same for ABC, and I believe it to be for the same reason. I think despite your claim otherwise, you do want ABC lynched and you're trying to have a deadline instituted to rush people into finishing him off instead of taking the closer look at you."

His reaction was very troubling. The way he seemed resigned to being the lynch bothered me, but then he actually defended himself. The attitude is something I'd expect regardless of alignment.

Btw, using your logic and judging from your vote post. Your main arguements are just vague points, one of which being completely subjective.

I'm still going to go back and expand my case on you, as well as take another look at Heph. But this HoS of yours further demonstrates the issues I've already indicated. This reads like an artificial arguement to me. You clearly didn't look over the interaction with Heph and I as you said you were going to. That or you've intentionally left things out to make me look bad. One of the things you missed is in a post that you've already quoted, once again displays that you aren't observing things.

Vote: Wonktonodi

Besides that, you noticed noname said "scum" are illiterate or lazy?

so what you said is basicaly a confession

(and I guess a little smiley at the end would help you see it was mostly a joke interpretation of your reply... but I guess i'm the only one reading it that way :-/ )

Argh hate how I hate myself now for again not being here to fullfill my duty as a towny and that I want to go to sleep right now... I will try to find some time tomorrow to catch up to page 18 and 19 (i read to 17 now) and then I hope to find even more time to do what I promised to do...

Haha, no. I just let you guys know because it's a sudden disappearance that I have no control over.(Btw, it's volunteer even!)

I know you're joking, but my real life has no influence on the alignment nor role I'm assigned, and I'll never take votes or even a lynch as a personal thing. Scratch that, anyone that votes, lynches, or night kills me is a firefighter-hater! :P

Methinks your point that radish may not be "new and improved" after all is a valid one.

well end of day does call for a vote, no hard feeling don't worry.

looking at the votes i wonder, what"s this round policy on double lynches?

4A) Are you confirming you're 100% sure he's scum? I agree there shouldn't have been a hint if he does in fact have a role, but I just feel like the case should've been made(since you did state you were already planning on voting Heph, I will concede that) without bringing that up. After that, your logic doesn't make sense. If you figured he'd claim when about to be lynched, then you should just wait for that to happen. Additionally, if you were planning to unvote in the event of a claim then your suspicions aren't as strong after all. It certainly doesn't reinforce your notion that having doubts about lynching him makes him scum using that doubt to hide.

I'm leaning more and more towards my initial thought that you jumped on it because you did think it was a hint at a role and wanted to get that information one way or another.

5) Sorry, I didn't actually make the implication with that point. I think you're fishing for people's thoughts so you can latch on to the ones you can use.