| Hephaestos said:
1.where did i insult you? you mean making fun of your failed logic? i'm sorry ot hurts your feelings but your points are so far from the construction you used us to. in fact, you remind me of myself, the only time i ever was mafia on day one. i had to be convinced by nordlead to vote radish cause i was tangeant, much like your exchange with proff earlier. Evidently in the present case he didn't have a vote on me as his logic prevented him from doing that early association to my lynch, only problem for you is that he would have had legitimacy in voting me erroneously, you on the other hand only provided proof from your immagination. heck i'll make a point. Unvote Vote Linkz for being unable to build a case when playing as scum (that or this is gonna make me lol for a long while
(for future reference, Wonk is still definitely scum, his lowered activity since i began getting heat is further sign of this... that or he let the praise he got go to his head this round). |
Well I got to say you've gotten me to lol back with the bolded.
The big issue that I've had with you before that I still have with you know is how you dismiss other people points. Not discussing them just dismissing them and saying failed logic. When I called you out on that the first time you moved to calling things irrelavent.
I'm now quite confident you are scum. I'm thinking linkz is as well but isn't going to push a lynch because he wants to find more day one.
Not only this but you are now thrownig around pass game reference left and right.
Finnaly having a life is not the same as lowered activity. I'm still pushing to lynch you and will continue to do so.
Essay Pro