VGC Mafia Round 25

[Linkzmax]

Hephaestos said:

Linkzmax said:

Hephaestos said:

o recall both massons and mafia being told they could talk day one last round... trucks was a masson, he might have liked the idea. Especially as this little advantage could help tweak the game to a 2 mafia other day SK rather than just 3 mafia?

Well I did think it was wierd when I read it in the quicktopics but now I wouldn't rule it out...

What makes you think there's an SK? Also, I can accept that you misread Stefl and thought he implied there were 4 mafia. Yet just as theRepublic pointed out with Stefl, it seems you're making a statement of fact that if there's no third-party then the scumteam is composed of three members.

4 or 2 would be unbalanced... unless for2 if there is an sk.

and i know the option i didn't explain is wrong.

1) What "option" are you referring to?

Hephaestos said:

theprof00 said:

The latest example is the best for my point of you overanalyzing into bullying day one. trash said she had 192 posts overnight. You point out it's wrong and that she can't have logged on for 28 hours to get that number. What do you do with this info? instead of drawing conclusions or going to the next question, you requier from her an explanation, and insist on it. This is preasure applied on something that is irrelevant to the game. The only info that you get is that people are enoyed and become somewhat agressive to you. This is what happened with Gniz's being sick last round. You argued for a while on the "let's say" and in the end you had to drop the case (and he turned out town).

2) prof has already explained himself here, but I thought it was apparent in his post what the conlusion was. "So, you said 192 new posts, eh? That means that last time you were online was 14:41 GMT 2/13/11, which means you went without posting for 20 hours, and just watched." prof never asked or demanded for an explanation, so I really don't see where you got that from. trashleg did try to offer one and it's perfectly reasonable for prof to respond to that.

Hephaestos said:

Vote : Timelimit

we're reaching 750 posts. People have to have an idea of what they want to do day one by now (and they'll have the time till the timelimit too).

3) HoS: Hephaestos
I certainly have an idea now, but ~100 posts ago I wasn't as satisfied with my decision at the time. I really don't like the way you(and trashleg) have voted for time limits when the attention of several people shifted in your(and her) direction. Since you pointed it out once again, you defended me in my first game to try and gain the trust of a townie. You've done the same for ABC, and I believe it to be for the same reason. I think despite your claim otherwise, you do want ABC lynched and you're trying to have a deadline instituted to rush people into finishing him off instead of taking the closer look at you.

If I were to vote now it'd be for your lynch. I'm going to go back and take that closer look though.