how does virtual boy have nothing to do with either? Because its a failed system more than 10 years old.  Doesn't matter its age or success/failure.  It used 3D, end point.

it uses 3D, that is the whole argument.Actually, it isn't, thats what i've ben trying to tell you. I wasnt mentioning virtual boy. I was saying that even if Sony would made a handheld with 3D it wouldnt be copying 3DS (again, THREE-D-S, not fucking virtual boy) How would they not be copying the ONLY other handheld gaming console on the market who happens to have ALREADY been doing 3D?  So by that thinking, if Nintendo implements a back touch pad then they aren't copying Sony.  alright gotcha.

You were saying that sony woudl not be copying Nintendo's 3D because they already are doing it.  I was stating that Nintendo did 3D first.You honestly think Nintendo was the first one to do 3D in video games, Wow, ok...   No I was stating Nintendo did 3D BEFORE SONY.  Thats it.  

The virtual boy was before the PS3's 3D, before the 3DS 3D. And yet i wasnt talking about virtual boy, but 3DS. You can't ignore it.  Doesn't matter if the Virtual boy is this gen hardware or not.  Or are we going to say the 360 was the first system to implement an analog stick.  i mean we can ignore all prior generations right?

your being an idiot.  This has nothign to do with who came out with 3D first, which WAS NOT SONY fyi.Neither was Nintendo, FYI  I know, I was just saying Nintendo did before Sony.

IF Sony says "3D on an handheld is stupid," They didnt say its stupid, they say they find it un-necessary at the moment, don try to twist someone's word to make something out of your argument here.  Thats a PR's way of saying 3D is stupid, but still trying to leave it open for INCASE they want to implement it later like they did MOVE.  but then later makes the NGP have 3D, that is eating crow.

Who came out with 3D first or that Sony was using 3D before means jack shit in this argument. Than why come up and say '' Sony saying they have been using ths technology 15 years ago'' ? You said that, you brought that up, not me.  You brought up how Sony used 3D way before the 3DS.  I brought up the virtual boy which was WAY before any sony 3d.  Case closed.

Its just like when Sony said MOTION was stupid regarding the Wii, and later release the MOVE.  Doesn't matter if they were working on MOVE in 1910, they STILL ATE CROW. But they did work on the technology before Nintendo (if we pretend they started working on Move in 1910) and that was my whole point from the beginning -  That Sony wouldnt copy 3DS if they used 3D.  WHAT.  seriously read what you wrote.  You are really going to believe some jack shit PR saying we were working on said technology for YEARS before someone released theirs.  So your telling me Sony was working on MOVE for years and years before the Wii released, and only finally finished a barely upgradable wiimote .  Oh btw did Nintnedo magically make the Wiimote in a couple months before the Wii release, or could they have ALSO been working on that tech for years?   Arguing on who started working on said tech first is the most moronic argument one can make.  Hell I'm going to start working on a a time machine today.  So whenever someone else finishes one, and i later blatently rip them off, you just remember who started first.  that was me.

How do you not get what eating crow is about.  Its saying one thing and doing another.  Regardless of who invented or used 3D first.  Sony is saying that it is dumb for a handheld.  THUS if they implement it on the NGP, they are serving themselves crow.  Doesn't matter if they are working on 3D for the NGP behind scenes, doesn't matter if PS3 is using 3D.  None of that matters.  It only matter on what they say and what they do.Again, they didnt said its stupid, stop twisiting words.   I know they didn't say its stupid flat out.  THEY TWISTED their words to be PR correct and to not be made such fools as with the motion.  They said it so that they can later come out with 3D and go "we said we would implement it when we saw it was necessary" instead of being bashed for disregarding it earlier and copying it later.

Wow, this thread is beyond petty mudslinging.

It's a black eye on the face of what is usually an intelligent community.

Correction: This place used to have an intelligent community. I'm not sure when it started becoming a New fag fest, but that's what ruined the atmosphere of this site. Was my favorite site on games until a couple of years ago.

Concluding the intelligence level of a community of 70,000 people based on the comments of a small minority of these people = invalid argument.

But most threads that I have read are first a good read but later on become like this thread. And when I say community, I'm talking about people that post often.

Oh my science! I come back and the thread is like this? What's the problem if Sony comes to copy Nintendo again?

Grow up, there is no problem in that. It's just the way these companies go.