By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Should People Take Justice Into Their Own Hands (partocular case)

 

Should People Take Justice Into Their Own Hands (partocular case)

Yes 48 57.83%
 
No 32 38.55%
 
Total:80
sapphi_snake said:
pizzahut451 said:

And thats why Nazi germany turned jewish !!!!!! But no seriously, the one day the empire wants to destroy a religion, and the next day, it becoes part of it because religion is a fad? Religion isnt something like clothesr or music that you can just switch to whenever you want. And who the fuck was forced to be christian back than? Christians were haunted down and slaughterd all over isreal, they had no army, nor violent influence on anyone, especially on romans. Romans were by far the strongest empire in the world, they didnt need to listen to anyone if they didnt want to. The truth is, they were blessed by the truth, and by our powerfull God, and our heavenly savior. No one could force Romans to do anything back than, and if they were converted by other christians, im pretty sure its because of what the christians were saying abut their religion, not because it was a fad.

 

And i know violence was used in roman, but it was used by romans, not the first christians.  Anywyas, the fact remains -  CHRISTIANITY CONQUERD ROME (THE EMPIRE THAT TRIED TO DESTROY IT ) WITHOUT ANY VIOLENCE <<<--- This is a FACT

It's not a fact. Violence was sued. And again, people coverted because they wanted to be in the Emperor's good graces, after he showed special favor to Christianity, not because they thought the religion was better. People back then did whatever a figure like the emperor would do, in other words they'd be subjected to his whims. 

Christians themselves also persectured and forcefully converted many Native Americans (and in a couple of decades Latin American countries will have the largest Christian population in the world). Kings from Germanic and Slavic countries forced their subjects to convert, to get in the good graces of the Pope. And violence was used there. And lets not forget all the wars between differen Christian sects (heck, Christians were persecuting eachother in my very country less than a century ago). The ideea that Christianity is a non-violent religion is a myth (the first Christians don't count, as Christianity started gaining influence and popularity when it became mixed up with politics).


So you are saying the Christians used violence on Romans? Yeah, that makes sense considering the size and power of Roman Empire back than... And you should know that by conquering the Empreror, Christianity conquerered Rome.  And sorry to dissapoint you, but religion ws a HUGE deal to people back than, probably one of the most important factors of daily life back than. The Jupiter was Roman most prasied God, and they all rejected him and accepted the true God. And do you mind ansvering this question, why did an Empreror turned Christian when  his Empire haunted christians down for decades? It must have been because of the evil christian bastrds brainwashig him, right? It couldnt possibly be that he actually enlightend by our religion. 

 

Your second paragraph is straight up pointless, i wasnt arguing waht other christians did, just that the Christianity conquerd Rome without using violence.



Around the Network
sapphi_snake said:
Disrarge said:

axt113 said:Disrarge said: I beleive it's not our place to seek revenge... Just Gods... How do you know we are not gods?  Perhaps the gods are within us all, in which case we are allowed to seek revenge by your logic

True. I said it's not our place to seek revenge. Then I said just gods. I mean the gods are just, not it's just god's place to seek revenge. Humans are not gods but they can become gods. Gods are not humans but they can become humans. Men are born of demons, women of angels... But there are good banana and bad banana angels and demons.

See, you can try twisting my words around to whatever you want to make me say. Your effort will be futile because I am the master bater. Master debater I should say.

DO NOT twist my words. As you can see I do it better... Now, GOD is the only person who is allowed to seek revenge. We humans are here to learn lessons, not get revenge on our fellow man. Love you neighbor and hate you neighbor, just don't kill em. God never said we had to be nice to our neighbor... But he did say not to kill em.

 

 


I'm pretty sure "Thou Shalt Love Thy Neighbour as Thyself" is of of the 10 Commandments FTR. I think that's more than just not killing them.

I'm pretty sure you never paid attention to the bible. The commandment is "You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor." The thing about loving your neighbor as yourself came from Jesus and is not one of the ten commandments. Jesus said love the lord your God with all you heart mind and soul, and love your neighbor as yourself.

If we're getting technical God EL never said that about loving your neighbor. That was Jesus.

I said love your neighbor and hate your neighbor... Because I love and hate myself... That's how I treat my neighbors.

 

 





Kasz216 said:
sapphi_snake said:
Kasz216 said:


1) Actually, I would disagree... most pagan religion's main focus of belief was in fact "My god could beat up your god."   It didn't take much conversion.   You won?  Most of those people adopted your religion.  Judiasm was the first of the "New Religions" whose belief was built more on... well belief.

2)  Judaism is not ethnically tied to anything.  Jewish people are Arabs.  Also, at the time it surivived the Assyrians, the Torah wasn't even completeted!  It's actually events we first learned IN the Torah, and was later historicaly proven.  Which is another point towards the Abrhamic religions by the way.  They appear to be historically accurate.   Few people know this, but the house of Paul... one of Jesus' disciples is something you can visit in Israel.

As for Christianity... well you couldn't be more wrong.   Hell, you brought out my point for me, but actually ignored the salient point of it.   Roman Emperorers converted to Christianity... when it was very unpopular.  (Though it was well more popular then Scientology.)   Christianity conquered and empire that was trying to wipe it out... without using force.

 

If you think it would of been wiped out you should look up the Kakure Kirishitan.

1. I was talking about religions in general. I doubt pizzahut knows much abotu pagan religions. Seems like you just want to disagree with me at all costs.

2. Judaism is tied strongly to Jewish ethnical identity and history (as you yourself said). This makes it different than most religions, and is a reason why i hasn't died out, yet it has also never been very popular (because it isn't inclusive).

As for Paul, did he ever meet Jesus? Wasn't he just a self appointed disciple?And what does he have to do with Judaism? He started hiw own religion after all.

As for Christianity, the fact that Roman emperors converted to Christianity when it was unpopular (and really not much more popular than Scientology) is highly unimpressive, as they could do mostly whatever they wanted. The fact that people converted to Christianity to get in the good graces of the emperor is hardly a compliment for Christianity (as it makes it look like a fad). Plus, Christianity did become mandatory eventually, didn't it? Violence was also used in certain parts (like Scandinavia) and of course against pagans, and the so called heretics, the genocide of Native Americans etc. And there's the religious wars bewtween the different Christian sects, you know, violence to assure that a certain type of Christianity will rule over all.

As for that Kakure Kirishitan thing, well Native Americans went underground like that when they were forced to convert. Constant persecution eventually made their religions die out anyway. Not everyone is as violent and consistent at converting others as Christians are.


1.  It doesn't matter how much he knows if in general his proof proves his point.

2)  That really isn't why.  Your just being ignorant because as always it takes you forever to admit whe n your wrong.  Native Americans do not practice a pagan religion.  As for the Kakure Kirishitan's dieing out... if they were going to, they would of died out a loooong time before the restrictions came up.

1. He wasn't talking about what you think he was talking about. He was saying that his religion is better than other religions, based on some objective criteria that doesn't exist in reality. How exactly does saying that his religion "speaks of the one true God", or of the "one true massiah who died for our sins" proove his point that Christianity is better than pagan religions? Or are you yourself a Bible thumper, and those "arguments" convice you?

2. It really isn't why. As usual, you're the ignorant one who won't listen.

And Native Americans did practice a pagan religion. All indigenous religions are considered pagan. And since pizzahut is a Christian, when he uses the word "pagan" he reffers to all non-Abrahamic religions, which will obvioulsy include whatever the Native Americans practice/practiced. And the natives (at least in Sounth and Central America), did have underground religious movements, not unlike that Kakure Kirishitan thing you mentioned. If the Kakure Kirishitan had undergone persecution at the level the Native Americans did, they would've died out too.



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

pizzahut451 said:


So you are saying the Christians used violence on Romans? Yeah, that makes sense considering the size and power of Roman Empire back than... And you should know that by conquering the Empreror, Christianity conquerered Rome.  And sorry to dissapoint you, but religion ws a HUGE deal to people back than, probably one of the most important factors of daily life back than. The Jupiter was Roman most prasied God, and they all rejected him and accepted the true God. And do you mind ansvering this question, why did an Empreror turned Christian when  his Empire haunted christians down for decades? It must have been because of the evil christian bastrds brainwashig him, right? It couldnt possibly be that he actually enlightend by our religion. 

 

Your second paragraph is straight up pointless, i wasnt arguing waht other christians did, just that the Christianity conquerd Rome without using violence.

I'd go with the brainwashing part, as cults are known to do that. Too bad there were no deprogramming experts back then.

Anyways, Christians were persectued back then because they often refused to fight in the military, and they did not awknoledge that the Emepror was a god (something which gave the Emperor legitimacy in the eyes of the people). Of course people back the were superstitious, and when Constantine thoght that he recieved help from "God" when he won a battle, he decided to give special favor to Christianity (the whole legitimacy issue would be solved in the future, by sayin things like "the King/Emperor was sent by God to rule over the Empire/Kingdom" nonsense). People only converted to get in the Emperor's good graces, not because they found the religion "enlightning". And eventually, when Christianity was declared the official religion, pagans were persected, killed, their places of whorship were destroyed etc.



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

Disrarge said:
sapphi_snake said:
Disrarge said:

axt113 said:Disrarge said: I beleive it's not our place to seek revenge... Just Gods... How do you know we are not gods?  Perhaps the gods are within us all, in which case we are allowed to seek revenge by your logic

True. I said it's not our place to seek revenge. Then I said just gods. I mean the gods are just, not it's just god's place to seek revenge. Humans are not gods but they can become gods. Gods are not humans but they can become humans. Men are born of demons, women of angels... But there are good banana and bad banana angels and demons.

See, you can try twisting my words around to whatever you want to make me say. Your effort will be futile because I am the master bater. Master debater I should say.

DO NOT twist my words. As you can see I do it better... Now, GOD is the only person who is allowed to seek revenge. We humans are here to learn lessons, not get revenge on our fellow man. Love you neighbor and hate you neighbor, just don't kill em. God never said we had to be nice to our neighbor... But he did say not to kill em.

 

 


I'm pretty sure "Thou Shalt Love Thy Neighbour as Thyself" is of of the 10 Commandments FTR. I think that's more than just not killing them.

I'm pretty sure you never paid attention to the bible. The commandment is "You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor." The thing about loving your neighbor as yourself came from Jesus and is not one of the ten commandments. Jesus said love the lord your God with all you heart mind and soul, and love your neighbor as yourself.

If we're getting technical God EL never said that about loving your neighbor. That was Jesus.

I said love your neighbor and hate your neighbor... Because I love and hate myself... That's how I treat my neighbors.

 

 



I did pay attention to the Bible, but that was a long time ago (at least it seems that way), and I have no interest in it now.

And if we're getting technical, you're suppose to consider that Jesus is God.



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

Around the Network
sapphi_snake said:
Disrarge said:
sapphi_snake said:
Disrarge said:

axt113 said:Disrarge said: I beleive it's not our place to seek revenge... Just Gods... How do you know we are not gods?  Perhaps the gods are within us all, in which case we are allowed to seek revenge by your logic

True. I said it's not our place to seek revenge. Then I said just gods. I mean the gods are just, not it's just god's place to seek revenge. Humans are not gods but they can become gods. Gods are not humans but they can become humans. Men are born of demons, women of angels... But there are good banana and bad banana angels and demons.

See, you can try twisting my words around to whatever you want to make me say. Your effort will be futile because I am the master bater. Master debater I should say.

DO NOT twist my words. As you can see I do it better... Now, GOD is the only person who is allowed to seek revenge. We humans are here to learn lessons, not get revenge on our fellow man. Love you neighbor and hate you neighbor, just don't kill em. God never said we had to be nice to our neighbor... But he did say not to kill em.

 

 


I'm pretty sure "Thou Shalt Love Thy Neighbour as Thyself" is of of the 10 Commandments FTR. I think that's more than just not killing them.

I'm pretty sure you never paid attention to the bible. The commandment is "You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor." The thing about loving your neighbor as yourself came from Jesus and is not one of the ten commandments. Jesus said love the lord your God with all you heart mind and soul, and love your neighbor as yourself.

If we're getting technical God EL never said that about loving your neighbor. That was Jesus.

I said love your neighbor and hate your neighbor... Because I love and hate myself... That's how I treat my neighbors.

 

 



I did pay attention to the Bible, but that was a long time ago (at least it seems that way), and I have no interest in it now.

And if we're getting technical, you're suppose to consider that Jesus is God.

I'm a not your average christian. If you want me to argue how Jesus isn't God El but is rather a reincarnation of his son, YHWH, in human form...

I will. If you want to get really technical, that is... I can argue how Satan and God are the same word in some parts of the Torah before the jews altered it to make it easier to understand... Copied ancient sumerians... Stole the story of Enlil and Enki and made their own bible from it... Grr...

If you truly paid attention to the bible you would not have forgotten it. Do you wish to argue differently?



sapphi_snake said:
Kasz216 said:
sapphi_snake said:
Kasz216 said:


1) Actually, I would disagree... most pagan religion's main focus of belief was in fact "My god could beat up your god."   It didn't take much conversion.   You won?  Most of those people adopted your religion.  Judiasm was the first of the "New Religions" whose belief was built more on... well belief.

2)  Judaism is not ethnically tied to anything.  Jewish people are Arabs.  Also, at the time it surivived the Assyrians, the Torah wasn't even completeted!  It's actually events we first learned IN the Torah, and was later historicaly proven.  Which is another point towards the Abrhamic religions by the way.  They appear to be historically accurate.   Few people know this, but the house of Paul... one of Jesus' disciples is something you can visit in Israel.

As for Christianity... well you couldn't be more wrong.   Hell, you brought out my point for me, but actually ignored the salient point of it.   Roman Emperorers converted to Christianity... when it was very unpopular.  (Though it was well more popular then Scientology.)   Christianity conquered and empire that was trying to wipe it out... without using force.

 

If you think it would of been wiped out you should look up the Kakure Kirishitan.

1. I was talking about religions in general. I doubt pizzahut knows much abotu pagan religions. Seems like you just want to disagree with me at all costs.

2. Judaism is tied strongly to Jewish ethnical identity and history (as you yourself said). This makes it different than most religions, and is a reason why i hasn't died out, yet it has also never been very popular (because it isn't inclusive).

As for Paul, did he ever meet Jesus? Wasn't he just a self appointed disciple?And what does he have to do with Judaism? He started hiw own religion after all.

As for Christianity, the fact that Roman emperors converted to Christianity when it was unpopular (and really not much more popular than Scientology) is highly unimpressive, as they could do mostly whatever they wanted. The fact that people converted to Christianity to get in the good graces of the emperor is hardly a compliment for Christianity (as it makes it look like a fad). Plus, Christianity did become mandatory eventually, didn't it? Violence was also used in certain parts (like Scandinavia) and of course against pagans, and the so called heretics, the genocide of Native Americans etc. And there's the religious wars bewtween the different Christian sects, you know, violence to assure that a certain type of Christianity will rule over all.

As for that Kakure Kirishitan thing, well Native Americans went underground like that when they were forced to convert. Constant persecution eventually made their religions die out anyway. Not everyone is as violent and consistent at converting others as Christians are.


1.  It doesn't matter how much he knows if in general his proof proves his point.

2)  That really isn't why.  Your just being ignorant because as always it takes you forever to admit whe n your wrong.  Native Americans do not practice a pagan religion.  As for the Kakure Kirishitan's dieing out... if they were going to, they would of died out a loooong time before the restrictions came up.

1. He wasn't talking about what you think he was talking about. He was saying that his religion is better than other religions, based on some objective criteria that doesn't exist in reality. How exactly does saying that his religion "speaks of the one true God", or of the "one true massiah who died for our sins" proove his point that Christianity is better than pagan religions? Or are you yourself a Bible thumper, and those "arguments" convice you?

2. It really isn't why. As usual, you're the ignorant one who won't listen.

And Native Americans did practice a pagan religion. All indigenous religions are considered pagan. And since pizzahut is a Christian, when he uses the word "pagan" he reffers to all non-Abrahamic religions, which will obvioulsy include whatever the Native Americans practice/practiced. And the natives (at least in Sounth and Central America), did have underground religious movements, not unlike that Kakure Kirishitan thing you mentioned. If the Kakure Kirishitan had undergone persecution at the level the Native Americans did, they would've died out too.


1) what he's saying doesn't really matter.

 

2) Calling the Native American religion a pagan religion is a big misnomer.  The Pagans were an actual group, and in general a term for Europeon nations.  To use it to count Native Americans is just... silly, and in general a catch all some people use for "Everything not Abrahamic."   Aside from which, Native American relgions are basically like monotheistic hinduism from everything i've read.

 

To assume all Christians use the term like that is... pretty bad.  Why you would think that I dont't know.

Also uh... the Kakure Krishtians faced a greater level of persecution quite honestly.

Indians were forced marched with little regard for their health... unless your talking about South and Central American Indians, who really don't like to be called "Native Americans" because they're very much different from the Northern American tribes.  If your talking about them you should say idigenious people of central and south america, or specifically by those the spanish took over.

The Kakure were just outright killed, without chance for conversion.



Kasz216 said:
sapphi_snake said:
Kasz216 said:
sapphi_snake said:
Kasz216 said:


1) Actually, I would disagree... most pagan religion's main focus of belief was in fact "My god could beat up your god."   It didn't take much conversion.   You won?  Most of those people adopted your religion.  Judiasm was the first of the "New Religions" whose belief was built more on... well belief.

2)  Judaism is not ethnically tied to anything.  Jewish people are Arabs.  Also, at the time it surivived the Assyrians, the Torah wasn't even completeted!  It's actually events we first learned IN the Torah, and was later historicaly proven.  Which is another point towards the Abrhamic religions by the way.  They appear to be historically accurate.   Few people know this, but the house of Paul... one of Jesus' disciples is something you can visit in Israel.

As for Christianity... well you couldn't be more wrong.   Hell, you brought out my point for me, but actually ignored the salient point of it.   Roman Emperorers converted to Christianity... when it was very unpopular.  (Though it was well more popular then Scientology.)   Christianity conquered and empire that was trying to wipe it out... without using force.

 

If you think it would of been wiped out you should look up the Kakure Kirishitan.

1. I was talking about religions in general. I doubt pizzahut knows much abotu pagan religions. Seems like you just want to disagree with me at all costs.

2. Judaism is tied strongly to Jewish ethnical identity and history (as you yourself said). This makes it different than most religions, and is a reason why i hasn't died out, yet it has also never been very popular (because it isn't inclusive).

As for Paul, did he ever meet Jesus? Wasn't he just a self appointed disciple?And what does he have to do with Judaism? He started hiw own religion after all.

As for Christianity, the fact that Roman emperors converted to Christianity when it was unpopular (and really not much more popular than Scientology) is highly unimpressive, as they could do mostly whatever they wanted. The fact that people converted to Christianity to get in the good graces of the emperor is hardly a compliment for Christianity (as it makes it look like a fad). Plus, Christianity did become mandatory eventually, didn't it? Violence was also used in certain parts (like Scandinavia) and of course against pagans, and the so called heretics, the genocide of Native Americans etc. And there's the religious wars bewtween the different Christian sects, you know, violence to assure that a certain type of Christianity will rule over all.

As for that Kakure Kirishitan thing, well Native Americans went underground like that when they were forced to convert. Constant persecution eventually made their religions die out anyway. Not everyone is as violent and consistent at converting others as Christians are.


1.  It doesn't matter how much he knows if in general his proof proves his point.

2)  That really isn't why.  Your just being ignorant because as always it takes you forever to admit whe n your wrong.  Native Americans do not practice a pagan religion.  As for the Kakure Kirishitan's dieing out... if they were going to, they would of died out a loooong time before the restrictions came up.

1. He wasn't talking about what you think he was talking about. He was saying that his religion is better than other religions, based on some objective criteria that doesn't exist in reality. How exactly does saying that his religion "speaks of the one true God", or of the "one true massiah who died for our sins" proove his point that Christianity is better than pagan religions? Or are you yourself a Bible thumper, and those "arguments" convice you?

2. It really isn't why. As usual, you're the ignorant one who won't listen.

And Native Americans did practice a pagan religion. All indigenous religions are considered pagan. And since pizzahut is a Christian, when he uses the word "pagan" he reffers to all non-Abrahamic religions, which will obvioulsy include whatever the Native Americans practice/practiced. And the natives (at least in Sounth and Central America), did have underground religious movements, not unlike that Kakure Kirishitan thing you mentioned. If the Kakure Kirishitan had undergone persecution at the level the Native Americans did, they would've died out too.


1) what he's saying doesn't really matter.

 

2) Calling the Native American religion a pagan religion is a big misnomer.  The Pagans were an actual group, and in general a term for Europeon nations.  To use it to count Native Americans is just... silly, and in general a catch all some people use for "Everything not Abrahamic."   Aside from which, Native American relgions are basically like monotheistic hinduism from everything i've read.

 

To assume all Christians use the term like that is... pretty bad.  Why you would think that I dont't know.

Also uh... the Kakure Krishtians faced a greater level of persecution quite honestly.

Indians were forced marched with little regard for their health... unless your talking about South and Central American Indians, who really don't like to be called "Native Americans" because they're very much different from the Northern American tribes.  If your talking about them you should say idigenious people of central and south america, or specifically by those the spanish took over.

The Kakure were just outright killed, without chance for conversion.

1. ??? His post was the catalyst of this whole off-topic conversation. Of course what he says matters.

2. You're right, I misused the tern "Native American". I meant the natives from Central and South America, not the ones from the North. They were treated pretty badly, and had an underground religious movement similar to what those Kakure Krishtians had. Their level of persecution was much worse though, especially if you consider that they were the majority, and were killed en-masse and forced to abadon their beliefs, while the Japanese were trying to protect themselves from foreign influencem, and from a violent extremist group (making their acts less despicable, and understandable).

Aas I said, all indigenous religions are considered pagan. And the Christians who conquered the Americas did call the pagans, and Christians do consider all non-Abrahamic religions to be "pagan". It's a term they adopted as the equivalent to the term "gentile" the Jews used. All of the Christians I know would use that term to describe Hindus, for example.



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

Kasz216 said:
sapphi_snake said:
Kasz216 said:
sapphi_snake said:
Kasz216 said:


1) Actually, I would disagree... most pagan religion's main focus of belief was in fact "My god could beat up your god."   It didn't take much conversion.   You won?  Most of those people adopted your religion.  Judiasm was the first of the "New Religions" whose belief was built more on... well belief.

2)  Judaism is not ethnically tied to anything.  Jewish people are Arabs.  Also, at the time it surivived the Assyrians, the Torah wasn't even completeted!  It's actually events we first learned IN the Torah, and was later historicaly proven.  Which is another point towards the Abrhamic religions by the way.  They appear to be historically accurate.   Few people know this, but the house of Paul... one of Jesus' disciples is something you can visit in Israel.

As for Christianity... well you couldn't be more wrong.   Hell, you brought out my point for me, but actually ignored the salient point of it.   Roman Emperorers converted to Christianity... when it was very unpopular.  (Though it was well more popular then Scientology.)   Christianity conquered and empire that was trying to wipe it out... without using force.

 

If you think it would of been wiped out you should look up the Kakure Kirishitan.

1. I was talking about religions in general. I doubt pizzahut knows much abotu pagan religions. Seems like you just want to disagree with me at all costs.

2. Judaism is tied strongly to Jewish ethnical identity and history (as you yourself said). This makes it different than most religions, and is a reason why i hasn't died out, yet it has also never been very popular (because it isn't inclusive).

As for Paul, did he ever meet Jesus? Wasn't he just a self appointed disciple?And what does he have to do with Judaism? He started hiw own religion after all.

As for Christianity, the fact that Roman emperors converted to Christianity when it was unpopular (and really not much more popular than Scientology) is highly unimpressive, as they could do mostly whatever they wanted. The fact that people converted to Christianity to get in the good graces of the emperor is hardly a compliment for Christianity (as it makes it look like a fad). Plus, Christianity did become mandatory eventually, didn't it? Violence was also used in certain parts (like Scandinavia) and of course against pagans, and the so called heretics, the genocide of Native Americans etc. And there's the religious wars bewtween the different Christian sects, you know, violence to assure that a certain type of Christianity will rule over all.

As for that Kakure Kirishitan thing, well Native Americans went underground like that when they were forced to convert. Constant persecution eventually made their religions die out anyway. Not everyone is as violent and consistent at converting others as Christians are.


1.  It doesn't matter how much he knows if in general his proof proves his point.

2)  That really isn't why.  Your just being ignorant because as always it takes you forever to admit whe n your wrong.  Native Americans do not practice a pagan religion.  As for the Kakure Kirishitan's dieing out... if they were going to, they would of died out a loooong time before the restrictions came up.

1. He wasn't talking about what you think he was talking about. He was saying that his religion is better than other religions, based on some objective criteria that doesn't exist in reality. How exactly does saying that his religion "speaks of the one true God", or of the "one true massiah who died for our sins" proove his point that Christianity is better than pagan religions? Or are you yourself a Bible thumper, and those "arguments" convice you?

2. It really isn't why. As usual, you're the ignorant one who won't listen.

And Native Americans did practice a pagan religion. All indigenous religions are considered pagan. And since pizzahut is a Christian, when he uses the word "pagan" he reffers to all non-Abrahamic religions, which will obvioulsy include whatever the Native Americans practice/practiced. And the natives (at least in Sounth and Central America), did have underground religious movements, not unlike that Kakure Kirishitan thing you mentioned. If the Kakure Kirishitan had undergone persecution at the level the Native Americans did, they would've died out too.


1) what he's saying doesn't really matter.

 

2) Calling the Native American religion a pagan religion is a big misnomer.  The Pagans were an actual group, and in general a term for Europeon nations.  To use it to count Native Americans is just... silly, and in general a catch all some people use for "Everything not Abrahamic."   Aside from which, Native American relgions are basically like monotheistic hinduism from everything i've read.

 

To assume all Christians use the term like that is... pretty bad.  Why you would think that I dont't know.

Also uh... the Kakure Krishtians faced a greater level of persecution quite honestly.

Indians were forced marched with little regard for their health... unless your talking about South and Central American Indians, who really don't like to be called "Native Americans" because they're very much different from the Northern American tribes.  If your talking about them you should say idigenious people of central and south america, or specifically by those the spanish took over.

The Kakure were just outright killed, without chance for conversion.

1. ??? His post was the catalyst of this whole off-topic conversation. Of course what he says matters.

2. You're right, I misused the tern "Native American". I meant the natives from Central and South America, not the ones from the North. They were treated pretty badly, and had an underground religious movement similar to what those Kakure Krishtians had. Their level of persecution was much worse though, especially if you consider that they were the majority, and were killed en-masse and forced to abadon their beliefs, while the Japanese were trying to protect themselves from foreign influence, and from a group who wanted to destroy their culture (making their acts less despicable, and understandable).

Aas I said, all indigenous religions are considered pagan. And the Christians who conquered the Americas did call the pagans, and Christians do consider all non-Abrahamic religions to be "pagan". It's a term they adopted as the equivalent to the term "gentile" the Jews used. All of the Christians I know would use that term to describe Hindus, for example.



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

sapphi_snake said:
pizzahut451 said:


So you are saying the Christians used violence on Romans? Yeah, that makes sense considering the size and power of Roman Empire back than... And you should know that by conquering the Empreror, Christianity conquerered Rome.  And sorry to dissapoint you, but religion ws a HUGE deal to people back than, probably one of the most important factors of daily life back than. The Jupiter was Roman most prasied God, and they all rejected him and accepted the true God. And do you mind ansvering this question, why did an Empreror turned Christian when  his Empire haunted christians down for decades? It must have been because of the evil christian bastrds brainwashig him, right? It couldnt possibly be that he actually enlightend by our religion. 

 

Your second paragraph is straight up pointless, i wasnt arguing waht other christians did, just that the Christianity conquerd Rome without using violence.

I'd go with the brainwashing part, as cults are known to do that. Too bad there were no deprogramming experts back then.

Anyways, Christians were persectued back then because they often refused to fight in the military, and they did not awknoledge that the Emepror was a god (something which gave the Emperor legitimacy in the eyes of the people). Of course people back the were superstitious, and when Constantine thoght that he recieved help from "God" when he won a battle, he decided to give special favor to Christianity (the whole legitimacy issue would be solved in the future, by sayin things like "the King/Emperor was sent by God to rule over the Empire/Kingdom" nonsense). People only converted to get in the Emperor's good graces, not because they found the religion "enlightning". And eventually, when Christianity was declared the official religion, pagans were persected, killed, their places of whorship were destroyed etc.

Wow, ok, im gonna stop arguing right now after i read that bolded part...wow. Did you hear yourself when you typed that?

EDIT: BTW, just to collapse your 2nd paragraph, Emperor wasn't considerd a God in Rome back than, Jupiter was. People thought that Emperor wa put in his position by God, not that he was God himself