DKHustlin said:
(..) the score given by a reviewer has no factual bearing on its value, so by not reading them, their influence is diminished, which is the main problem with reviews
|
Here is where you got things wrong
Yes, the score of the review could mean little, but READ reviews is useful as they can provide some information about the game. Is gameplay enjoyable, control well, got some bugs/issue and so on.
Usually to got better idea about one game, i go on Metacritics and read some reviews (the low ones, high ones and few middle ones), this can help you to have better idea about the game by telling what they like and what is brokenin the game, even more if they are several to discuss about the same points.
After, the score doesn't matter, what matter is if what you read and see of the game look like something you can enjoy. For exemple i really enjoyed the Civilization spin off "alpha centauri" even after read so-so reviews because i know that the meh graphics won't bother me and that the core game is a good civilization one with new technologies and some other extra (design your own units from parts...)
But we must first concentrate ourselves on the way to entertain people, for video games to live. Else, it's a world where sales representative will win, which has as effect to kill creativity. I want to say to the creators all around the world:"Courage, Dare!". Shigeru Miyamoto.