By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Which has more 1080p native games? Xbox 360 or PS3?

raygun said:

Actually 1080i is the limit without HDMI, not 1080p.

Edit. NVM



Around the Network
disolitude said:
dahuman said:
raygun said:

Actually 1080i is the limit without HDMI, not 1080p.


ZOMG STOP WITH THIS BS PEOPLE! Component is a lot like a VGA cable OK!??!?!?! Analog analog analog! It depends on the TV hardware to be able to display anything higher than 1080p on component, most newer TVs are able to do 1080p component KKKKKKKK????!?!!?! Don't post if you don't know about this shit! HDMI = 1.) Digital video w/audio 2.) HDCP capable to fight piracy, and 3.) 3D support.

I can do 3D over VGA on my PC...

Just sayin' :)

But why aren't you using DVI? It's a cleaner signal.

Every time I get a VGA dongle in a box or see a VGA port on a display I'll never use, I can't help but think "this could have been another HDMI or DVI port instead."

They don't even have VGA ports on video cards these days.



greenmedic88 said:
disolitude said:
dahuman said:
raygun said:

Actually 1080i is the limit without HDMI, not 1080p.


ZOMG STOP WITH THIS BS PEOPLE! Component is a lot like a VGA cable OK!??!?!?! Analog analog analog! It depends on the TV hardware to be able to display anything higher than 1080p on component, most newer TVs are able to do 1080p component KKKKKKKK????!?!!?! Don't post if you don't know about this shit! HDMI = 1.) Digital video w/audio 2.) HDCP capable to fight piracy, and 3.) 3D support.

I can do 3D over VGA on my PC...

Just sayin' :)

But why aren't you using DVI? It's a cleaner signal.

Every time I get a VGA dongle in a box or see a VGA port on a display I'll never use, I can't help but think "this could have been another HDMI or DVI port instead."

They don't even have VGA ports on video cards these days.

Im using DVI...I was just being difficult and was picking at his statement :)



greenmedic88 said:
Khuutra said:

Every generation I think "Okay, this will be the one where we get a ton of great-looking games at 60fps all the time"

And every generation, developers care about something else.

I'll take 720p next gen if I can get it locked at 60fps.

If everyone doesn't deliver 1920x1080p @ 60fps next generation at minimum, I have to question what else those consoles would bring besides a new platform to sell new games on considering that sub $100 GPUs with 1GB of dedicated VRAM should easily be able to deliver such performance.

While I doubt it would see any sort of mass consumer living room use, multi-display output should be an option. 

Well that's just the thing, there are always new graphical innovations that require more and more juice and have framerate sacrificed for them. For many devs (with few and precious exceptions), there is never a "good enough" in terms of eye candy.

I think we've hit that point. I want 60fps, no questions asked.



Khuutra said:
greenmedic88 said:
Khuutra said:

Every generation I think "Okay, this will be the one where we get a ton of great-looking games at 60fps all the time"

And every generation, developers care about something else.

I'll take 720p next gen if I can get it locked at 60fps.

If everyone doesn't deliver 1920x1080p @ 60fps next generation at minimum, I have to question what else those consoles would bring besides a new platform to sell new games on considering that sub $100 GPUs with 1GB of dedicated VRAM should easily be able to deliver such performance.

While I doubt it would see any sort of mass consumer living room use, multi-display output should be an option. 

Well that's just the thing, there are always new graphical innovations that require more and more juice and have framerate sacrificed for them. For many devs (with few and precious exceptions), there is never a "good enough" in terms of eye candy.

I think we've hit that point. I want 60fps, no questions asked.

lol why the huge fascination with 60fps? I'm perfectly happy with 30 if the game can actually hold it there.

But then again I don't really care about "native 1080p" either. I still spend 50% of my time playing non-hd games anyway.



Around the Network
perpride said:
Khuutra said:

Well that's just the thing, there are always new graphical innovations that require more and more juice and have framerate sacrificed for them. For many devs (with few and precious exceptions), there is never a "good enough" in terms of eye candy.

I think we've hit that point. I want 60fps, no questions asked.

lol why the huge fascination with 60fps? I'm perfectly happy with 30 if the game can actually hold it there.

But then again I don't really care about "native 1080p" either. I still spend 50% of my time playing non-hd games anyway.

I play action games! I can accept 30-60fps if it is locked at a single framerate. Stuttery framerates are a considerable turnoff.



BMaker11 said:

I thought the 360 couldn't even do 1080P natively because you need HDMI for that, and 360 originally didn't have that. Therefore, everything that's "1080P" on the Xbox is merely upscaled, while the PS3 was built with 1080P in mind from the ground up?

If my assumption is correct, the PS3 has more 1080P native games.....because the 360 has 0


Absolutely this. One hundred percent.

I remember reading articles about 360 a few years ago and how it maxed out at 720p or something. Or did that change with newer models?



I do care about native 1080p. No matter how much AA you throw at a 720p picture, a 1920x1080 picture will always look better on a 1920x1080 panel with dot by dot precision.

It didn't used to matter as much when we were still using CRT's, but lcd panels just look better at their native resolution. If you play on a plasma tv then chances are the resolution is 1366x768, even though the tv supports 1080p it will be downscaled. Then a 720p game with AA will look better then a 1080p game without. The same ofcourse for an lcd/plasma tv with 1280x720 native resolution.

On a 1920x1080 screen over 52 inches, yes 1080p matters. The pixeljunk series looks amazing, same for Wipeout HD. The extra vertical resolution does a lot too for GT5. Going back to NFS shift after GT5 you quickly realize that it's a lot harder to judge speed and corners.

The current hardware can't do it all at once, NFS hot pursuit visuals in 1920x1080 60fps with no tearing, maybe next gen.

Anyway I just got to see the extended ending movie in GT5 after finishing the extreme series, on a 92inch 1920x1080 screen. We still have a long way to go before you can call anything in motion photo realistic. Here's a link to a 720p version (with crappy compression unfortunately). It pales in comparison to watching it in blu-ray quality but you get the idea, I'm ready for next gen.

The ending starts at 26 minutes in the video, first person drive of Nordschleife.



Developers will always try and push console hardware as far as they can with each generation of games throughout the consoles lifespan (5-10 years of the same aging tech) so sometimes it means sacrificing resolution, frame rate and AA. It wil be no different next gen.

Oh and before anyone mentions it GT5  isn't native full HD but 1080p with vertical upscaling to 1920. Wipeout HD has dynamic vertical up/down scaling of the resolution depending on the complexity of the scene. Both look sumptuous.



greenmedic88 said:

But why aren't you using DVI? It's a cleaner signal.

Every time I get a VGA dongle in a box or see a VGA port on a display I'll never use, I can't help but think "this could have been another HDMI or DVI port instead."

They don't even have VGA ports on video cards these days.


See this is my problem, I have 3ports Vga, Dvi and HDMI on my monitor, the annoying bit, is hdmi does correct my screen, though becasue of my graph card dvi does sound as well so im sweet in that factor either way haha



 

Bet with Conegamer and Doobie_wop 

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3879752